Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > News and Current Events > Politics in the News

test
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2008, 12:13 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,588
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wow View Post
Well, it looks like Hansen is being paid by Al Gore and John Kerry. lol
This is another corrupt Scientist that has no credibility.

Dr. James Hansen

He is currently an adjunct professor in the Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences at Columbia University, and also serves as Al Gore's science advisor.
Hansen was elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 1996[7] and he received a $250,000 Heinz Environment Award[8] for his research on global warming in 2001.
Global warming, the 21st century academic gold rush. There is good money in dem der hills (loosely translated to "stupid followers wallets").

Oh, correct me if I am wrong, but aren't MMGW proponents supposed to be fiscally pure as opposed to those dirty money grubbing opponents?
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2008, 12:15 PM
wow's Avatar
wow wow is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 5,774
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TakuanSoho View Post
Global warming, the 21st century academic gold rush. There is good money in dem der hills (loosely translated to "stupid followers wallets").

Oh, correct me if I am wrong, but aren't MMGW proponents supposed to be fiscally pure as opposed to those dirty money grubbing opponents?
Why didn't USA Today mention that Hansen has been paid by Gore and Kerry to promote this hoax? Hmmmmm

Any clues?
__________________
The United States of Indentured Servants
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2008, 12:48 PM
LCOF's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,917
Default

Frankly why anyone would even listen to this fool, is amazing in and of itself. But what still lingers in my head is what happened from the point of the very first EARTH DAY, when it was stated we/world needed to fend off Global Cooling. I recall in 73 or 74 that we had 20 years to solve this crisis, or we'd freeze our butts off.

So in the time frame of our demise then, this turd, claims we had 20 years left and we were trending towards Global Warming.

There are 2 questions I beg Global Warming zealots to answer for me.

1. What was the dynamic before 1 Buick was idling at a stop sign that ended the Ice Age?

2. If in 73 or 74 we had 20 left before we succumbed to Global Cooling, and in that period, we were directed towards warming, what did we do then to stop Global Cooling. And if we did do something to end it, then find the happy medium that will get us trending cooler, and once we arrive to the optimum best climate place, mark the place and move in that direction and not vary from it.

I mention that in tongue and cheek because there was no Global Cooling then, and the same dummies who looked stupid then, are parading this warming hoax with a straight face. And dopes in Congress, and even the Presidential candidates lap this up as gospel.

If we as a world suffer from any warming effect, it could only result from the hot air expelled from this moron, and the useful idiots who buy into the hoax, and preach it as gospel.
__________________
McCAIN PALIN
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2008, 12:55 PM
Amazed's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Omaha, which is why Dave won't come here
Posts: 3,113
Default

It's ALWAYS about the Money.
__________________
There are those, I know, who will say that the liberation of humanity, the freedom of man and mind, is nothing but a dream. They are right. It is the American dream.
~Archibald MacLeish
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2008, 01:29 PM
toxic's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,467
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LCOF View Post
Frankly why anyone would even listen to this fool, is amazing in and of itself. But what still lingers in my head is what happened from the point of the very first EARTH DAY, when it was stated we/world needed to fend off Global Cooling. I recall in 73 or 74 that we had 20 years to solve this crisis, or we'd freeze our butts off.

So in the time frame of our demise then, this turd, claims we had 20 years left and we were trending towards Global Warming.

There are 2 questions I beg Global Warming zealots to answer for me.

1. What was the dynamic before 1 Buick was idling at a stop sign that ended the Ice Age?

2. If in 73 or 74 we had 20 left before we succumbed to Global Cooling, and in that period, we were directed towards warming, what did we do then to stop Global Cooling. And if we did do something to end it, then find the happy medium that will get us trending cooler, and once we arrive to the optimum best climate place, mark the place and move in that direction and not vary from it.

I mention that in tongue and cheek because there was no Global Cooling then, and the same dummies who looked stupid then, are parading this warming hoax with a straight face. And dopes in Congress, and even the Presidential candidates lap this up as gospel.

If we as a world suffer from any warming effect, it could only result from the hot air expelled from this moron, and the useful idiots who buy into the hoax, and preach it as gospel.

Why don't you take your excellent Hannity/Limbaugh argument to the National Academies of Science and present it to them. I'm sure the 10,000 scientists (G8+5) would all immediately reverse their decisions and embrace GOP Anti-science.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2008, 01:35 PM
LCOF's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,917
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by toxic View Post
Why don't you take your excellent Hannity/Limbaugh argument to the National Academies of Science and present it to them. I'm sure the 10,000 scientists (G8+5) would all immediately reverse their decisions and embrace GOP Anti-science.
Thank you for your compliments. They are excellent arguments and mostly mine.

But I should ask why do I need to take the arguments to the Academies? Any thoughtful thinking person can figure this out. The Academies you speak of with authority, are so confused in their claims. My argument would completely baffle them. Much like it seems to have baffled you.
__________________
McCAIN PALIN
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2008, 06:56 PM
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 443
Default

Hasn't everyone learned that global warming is nothing but a manifested doomsday scenario being taught EXACTLY like a religion? The facts they spew get blown to shreds over and over and in fact so many times are proved to be the opposite of the truth. In fact the world has started gettingh cooler not warmer and even the many loyal decons, priests, shaman, etc of this religion have recently said (to paraphrase: they just discovered why the earth is actually getting cooler but just wait because in another decade you will see it warm up again)....

Fact is, they have no facts behind their religion that can't be blown to shreds easier than actual religions.

This religion is by far the most destructive because it's basis has nothing to do with global temperatures but actually global control over individual peoples lives and preventing capitalist countries from remaining on top of the global hiarchy...
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 06-28-2008, 03:33 PM
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 642
Default

Outside of kook political boards on the internet most credible rational people understand global warming is real and needs drastic action.

I'm against thought control but global warming denial should be treated on a criminal basis.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 06-28-2008, 03:46 PM
LCOF's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,917
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetblast View Post
Outside of kook political boards on the internet most credible rational people understand global warming is real and needs drastic action.

I'm against thought control but global warming denial should be treated on a criminal basis.
And you will be the one to lead the charge. Bring it on.
__________________
McCAIN PALIN
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 06-28-2008, 03:57 PM
wow's Avatar
wow wow is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 5,774
Default

When do we start filing criminal charges against these states that refuse to convert to alternative energy sources?
John Kerry and Ted kennedy would be the first arrested.
I fully support this action.
__________________
The United States of Indentured Servants
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


» Navigation

Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!


test

$5 monthly donation:

$10 monthly donation:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Poltical Topsites PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings