Haditha Marine prepares to sue Murtha over smear

kgpoolerev · #91 (**permalink**) 06-28-2008, 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by toxic

Yes, I (Army) "trained" with Marines, but more importantly, I serve with them in war. I know their few strengths and many weaknesses. Of course, I've also served along side Navy and Air Force to.

Now, I was talking to NeoConHardy, not you. When I'm talking to a brainless moron, I try to talk in terms he can understand. NeoConHardy, like many Conservatives here are slamming combat military veterans, while kissing the ass of non-combatant branches or non-veterans. That's bullshit.

... but if you want, we can continue through the list of weaknesses, as I did for Smitty0311 late last year. I think those weaknesses explain their misconceptions about the usefulness of unnecessary war and killing children.

Toxic, I am stilling waiting for you to clarify what law school takes students who do not even know what a monarcy is, students like you.

Now we find out that you have spent time training with all the branches of service. Fine we will take you at your word and ask you to tell us what you did. I worked with all the branches of the service when I was in the Air Force as a Russian linguist. I was the only Air Force linguist at my base that sat the Navy mission so I worked closely with the Navy and the sole Marine linguist who worked my shift. I would be full of shit if I pretened that gave me a great working knowledge of the Marine combat training. So now you know why you need to specify your field so we can determine whether you are credible or if that is were you went to law school.

Quote:

Originally Posted by StormanNorman

Maybe there is someone here that knows more about the law than me....but, I guess I'm not sure on what grounds the Marine can sue. If Murtha believed they were guilty when he made his remarks, then that wouldn't be slander, would it? I thought slander was when someone deliberately and knowingly falsely accuses someone of something on purpose.....with the intent of smearing them. If not, then I wonder how many people OJ could sue?

OJ was convicted in the civil trial so bringing up OJ is not logical to make your point. I hope to one day see all the Marines AND the Marine Corp. sue Murtha for falsely accusing the Marines and the Marine Corp. Murtha was trying to use his position as a Congressman to influence the outcome of the criminal case by acting as he did. Someone can argue that he was not, but that is why there are trials.

Jetblast · #92 (**permalink**) 06-28-2008, 04:14 PM

As much as the neo-fascists in this room would like it to be, the fact hasn't changed that the aggressive murder of the innocent men in the taxi as well as the old women, children, and men in the houses was a war crime for which the marines would have been tried and jailed during WWII. It takes real balls, typical of our cozy neo-fascist present government, to sue someone for correctly poiting out the depraved criminality of this action.

The reason these men got away with it is because our government weasels have sensed that the public will let them piggyback on Israeli policy and methods to excuse this otherwise obvious war crime atrocity.

Amazed · #93 (**permalink**) 06-28-2008, 04:57 PM

Just because you are paranoid doesn't mean they aren't trying to get you Jet......

Jetblast · #94 (**permalink**) 06-28-2008, 05:08 PM

Your inability to offer anything but one-line trolls to matters of substance is noted.

kgpoolerev · #95 (**permalink**) 06-28-2008, 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jetblast

As much as the neo-fascists in this room would like it to be, the fact hasn't changed that the aggressive murder of the innocent men in the taxi as well as the old women, children, and men in the houses was a war crime for which the marines would have been tried and jailed during WWII. It takes real balls, typical of our cozy neo-fascist present government, to sue someone for correctly pointing out the depraved criminality of this action.

The reason these men got away with it is because our government weasels have sensed that the public will let them piggyback on Israeli policy and methods to excuse this otherwise obvious war crime atrocity.

Prove your accusations.

By the way, in WW II we fire bombed civilians intentionally. It was particularly effective in Japan due to the nature of their houses. I saw an estimate of about 1 million Japanese died in Tokyo alone, more than ten times either Hiroshima or Nagasaki. So no, if this was WW II it would be over already as we would have bombed the terrorists into submission. By accepting US casualties we are prolonging the struggle and people ignorant of the truth and history make outrageous claims with no validity.

It takes real balls to volunteer to serve. I did my time in the Air Force. Which branch did you serve in again Jet?

Amazed · #96 (**permalink**) 06-28-2008, 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jetblast

Your inability to offer anything but one-line trolls to matters of substance is noted.

I'm sorry, you mean like the one you just typed? Priceless....

Joe_King · #97 (**permalink**) 06-28-2008, 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kgpoolerev

Toxic, I am stilling waiting for you to clarify what law school takes students who do not even know what a monarcy is, students like you.

I suppose some place that let a person graduate with the understanding that there were 57 states ... Columbia University - that was one of the places Obama graduated from ...

actually it was something like he had been in 57 states missed 3 and won't go to 2 of them ... Something like that!

... but THAT is ALSO A Senator work works on the Federal level ...
--------- even my nine year old was shocked with THAT one ---------

It's NOT surprising to find someone who doesn't know what a Monarchy is ...