Closing In On Rove

Noibn · #31 (**permalink**) 05-19-2008, 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TakuanSoho

You are insane.

And you are extremely dangerous. So because you don't like a guys politics, you want to use ANY MEANS NO MATTER WHAT to punish him.

Fascist.

Like many on the left (mirror images of their counterparts on the right), they fail to see an opportunity when they see one.

I WANT Rove around.

I WANT ROVE on the talk shows and pundit-ocracy and on the op-ed pages of the WSJ and Newsweek.

I WANT Rove to boast how he has The Numbers like he diid just before the 2006 vote.

Frank Rich, whatever you think of him is right when he wrote on Sunday:

"Just look at Mr. Rove. Some Democrats are outraged that he is now employed as a pundit by Newsweek and The Wall Street Journal as well as Fox News. Instead of complaining, they should be thrilled that Mr. Rove keeps inviting Republican complacency by constantly locating silver linings in the party’s bad news. His ubiquitous TV presence as a thinly veiled McCain surrogate has the added virtue of wrapping the Republican ticket in a daily and suffocating Bush bearhug, since Mr. Rove is far more synonymous with his former boss than Mr. Obama is with his former pastor."

McCain Can Run, but Bush Won’t Hide - New York Times

Keep Karl Rover Free!!!

patriot2342001 · #32 (**permalink**) 05-19-2008, 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noibn

Like many on the left (mirror images of their counterparts on the right), they fail to see an opportunity when they see one.

I WANT Rove around.

I WANT ROVE on the talk shows and pundit-ocracy and on the op-ed pages of the WSJ and Newsweek.

I WANT Rove to boast how he has The Numbers like he diid just before the 2006 vote.

Frank Rich, whatever you think of him is right when he wrote on Sunday:

"Just look at Mr. Rove. Some Democrats are outraged that he is now employed as a pundit by Newsweek and The Wall Street Journal as well as Fox News. Instead of complaining, they should be thrilled that Mr. Rove keeps inviting Republican complacency by constantly locating silver linings in the party’s bad news. His ubiquitous TV presence as a thinly veiled McCain surrogate has the added virtue of wrapping the Republican ticket in a daily and suffocating Bush bearhug, since Mr. Rove is far more synonymous with his former boss than Mr. Obama is with his former pastor."

McCain Can Run, but Bush Won’t Hide - New York Times

Keep Karl Rover Free!!!

That was a great op-ed! ove the part about the Minneapolis airport, lol

TakuanSoho · #33 (**permalink**) 05-19-2008, 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noibn

Like many on the left (mirror images of their counterparts on the right), they fail to see an opportunity when they see one.

I WANT Rove around.

I WANT ROVE on the talk shows and pundit-ocracy and on the op-ed pages of the WSJ and Newsweek.

I WANT Rove to boast how he has The Numbers like he diid just before the 2006 vote.

Frank Rich, whatever you think of him is right when he wrote on Sunday:

"Just look at Mr. Rove. Some Democrats are outraged that he is now employed as a pundit by Newsweek and The Wall Street Journal as well as Fox News. Instead of complaining, they should be thrilled that Mr. Rove keeps inviting Republican complacency by constantly locating silver linings in the party’s bad news. His ubiquitous TV presence as a thinly veiled McCain surrogate has the added virtue of wrapping the Republican ticket in a daily and suffocating Bush bearhug, since Mr. Rove is far more synonymous with his former boss than Mr. Obama is with his former pastor."

McCain Can Run, but Bush Won’t Hide - New York Times

Keep Karl Rover Free!!!

If Rove broke the law, he should be punished. That is not the point. My point is that far too many people are making legal decisions based SOLELY on political decisions. Not a wise thing to do.

Noibn · #34 (**permalink**) 05-19-2008, 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TakuanSoho

If Rove broke the law, he should be punished. That is not the point. My point is that far too many people are making legal decisions based SOLELY on political decisions. Not a wise thing to do.

Agreed.

Gitmo is a textbook case.

It's not for nothing the lead prosecutor at the tribunal quit AND testified on behalf of a detainee even though he was certain the guys was guilty.

Jetblast · #35 (**permalink**) 05-19-2008, 02:12 PM

Americans don't want to take responsibility for correcting wrongs. They just want an easy system where pols promise them things they want to hear and they get them with least effort. That gave birth to Rove and is the source of the abomniable administration currently in power. Anyone who says some on the left are just as bad as those on the right are just interested in avoiding recognizing what bad Rove has caused and fixing it. The issue is the wrongs done and changes in government Rove embodies. Those changes include criminal acts by government taken as the norm, torture, polarization in order to divide and conquer for corporations (most of these retards on this site are too stupid to realize they are victims of the very policies they promote) and government arrogance in the name of some phony Fox News revenge against liberals when in fact it is just plain aggression.

Jetblast · #36 (**permalink**) 05-19-2008, 02:17 PM

Quote:

Welcome to today's far-left Democratic Party. You have just learned lesson 101. They will intimidate, threaten and ruin the reputations of people for the sake of ideology. For the far-left there is no debate or discussion. Just the desire to manipulate and to change the structure of the country. These people can't debate on substance because facts don't matter to them. However, they are very well financed and ver well organized and should not be taken lightly. If Obama wins the election it will be their nirvana. Hence the free ride he has gotten fro the press.

This is just stupid trash talk that projects the worst of the attorney general firing career ruiners, and Global Warming science censorship onto democrats. The poster is just a Fox News-brainwashed shill who bears no substance. This imbecilic politic is presently running our so-called principled nation.

toxic · #37 (**permalink**) 05-19-2008, 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TakuanSoho

If Rove broke the law, he should be punished. That is not the point. My point is that far too many people are making legal decisions based SOLELY on political decisions. Not a wise thing to do.

The Rovian Republicans have let that Genie out of the bottle and it's not going back in for another 50 years.

They will die by the sword they created.

TakuanSoho · #38 (**permalink**) 05-19-2008, 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by toxic

The Rovian Republicans have let that Genie out of the bottle and it's not going back in for another 50 years.

They will die by the sword they created.

What legal decisions did Rove make based solely on political reasons?