Closing In On Rove

Jetblast · #21 (**permalink**) 05-17-2008, 10:13 PM

Notice Amazed didn't necessarily say the analogy was wrong.

steve k · #22 (**permalink**) 05-17-2008, 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PPark

Don't know where the search warrant notion comes from, but one of the roles of congress-the judiciary committee--is to perform oversight. That requires obtaining relevant data and testimony from administration officials which obviously they've failed to acquire through normal procedures. The thing that is so odd about this particular circumstance is that Rove won't talk to Congress but has given interview(s) and written article(s) about the subject of interest. He's already stated this matter has nothing to do with the White House so there isn't a privilege available to hide behind. So all Rove needs to do is repeat the same stuff he's made public under oath before the body, everyone then completes their obligations, and the committee moves on to other business. If the administration wasn't so adverse to check and balances most of this would not be happening.

Now considering the stellar record the administration has had with upholding the principles they came into office mouthing it should be clear why they are so adverse to repeating their public proclamations under oath. I'm sure these administration officials are wasting our time and money for "good" personal reasons.

If you have proof that Rove is guilty of something then lay it out for the world to see. Otherwise, get over it. I have no love or hate for the man. I do believe that he was good at his job and some of his insights are interesting. However, until there is proof of a crime committed than all of this is just hot air.

steve k · #23 (**permalink**) 05-17-2008, 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TakuanSoho

You are insane.

And you are extremely dangerous. So because you don't like a guys politics, you want to use ANY MEANS NO MATTER WHAT to punish him.

Fascist.

Welcome to today's far-left Democratic Party. You have just learned lesson 101. They will intimidate, threaten and ruin the reputations of people for the sake of ideology. For the far-left there is no debate or discussion. Just the desire to manipulate and to change the structure of the country. These people can't debate on substance because facts don't matter to them. However, they are very well financed and ver well organized and should not be taken lightly. If Obama wins the election it will be their nirvana. Hence the free ride he has gotten fro the press.

A. Crowley · #24 (**permalink**) 05-17-2008, 10:43 PM

Seriously, which insights of Rove's did you find interesting?

steve k · #25 (**permalink**) 05-17-2008, 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A. Crowley

Seriously, which insights of Rove's did you find interesting?

Pretty much his election discussions. I watch O'Reilly when I can and he's been on the program. While I don't always agree with him he happens to be a bright guy, knows the in's and out's of the system and should be listenend too.

A. Crowley · #26 (**permalink**) 05-17-2008, 11:38 PM

Karl Rove: World's most detestible Professional Liar.

jan · #27 (**permalink**) 05-17-2008, 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A. Crowley

Karl Rove: World's most detestible Professional Liar.

But he is good at what he does. But his ethics are quite questionable in my opinion.

RASTAMAN · #28 (**permalink**) 05-18-2008, 07:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wow

True.
Conyer's wife made a death threat to a fellow council member a couple of months ago. John Conyers could be just as crazy as his ho.

How crazy are the two Conservative Whore Female senators by the name of Kathleen Bailey Hutchinson and Elizbeth I'm on the Dole!

Which one of these Ho's should McCain pick to be his "Running Bitch"

George O Well · #29 (**permalink**) 05-19-2008, 10:23 AM

Quote:

If you have proof that Rove is guilty of something then lay it out for the world to see.

>>>So, if you're a righty, we have to prove you are guilty BEFORE we can investigate you. Is that about right?

wow · #30 (**permalink**) 05-19-2008, 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by George O Well

>>>So, if you're a righty, we have to prove you are guilty BEFORE we can investigate you. Is that about right?

When a Democrat is sent to prison for crimes they committed, what would that have to do with Rove?
Democrats are telling America "You want to send us to prison for our crimes, we will destroy your life for wanting the rule of law to apply to Democrats"