High court approves voter ID!

World Hegemony · #**121** (**permalink**) 05-09-2008, 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Badmutha

Indeed, the amazing part to me is that this notion actually had to be taken to court....Im just glad common sense won for once...which of course means liberalism lost.

Praise Jesus....you have to show ID for everything else. All the democrat whining about vote fraud....and these same democrats oppose showing valid ID at the polls.....insanity indeed

Funny thing....the poor still seem to buy booze and cash welfare checks....the elderly still seem to be able to cash their SS checks...and the minorities still seem to be able to buy cars and drive.

Now that this has been passed.... we only have a few more commons sense voting requirements that need to be implemented.

1. If you don't pay taxes...you dont get to vote
2. If you collect government aid....you dont get to vote
3. If you work for the government...you also don't get to vote.

....eliminate the conflict of interest....and you eliminate liberalism

Now that dead democrats and illegal liberals won't be voting (twice) anymore...were one step closer

Haha i like 1. Just inverse no taxation without representation. No representation without taxation lol.

But i disagree, because these people are citizens and they do pay sales tax.

World Hegemony · #**122** (**permalink**) 05-09-2008, 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bil_Stunbmun

I've accepted Bill Clinton as my personal lord and savior, I'm going to heaven.

I always try to show that evil fascist neocon Republicans are depraved. Besides, they call us Democrats names.

Ha look at you calling us names.

World Hegemony · #**123** (**permalink**) 05-09-2008, 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dom1

Are ID cards discrimatory?

Yes. To liars and cheats. In other words, against democrats.

Even if they were discriminatory against a minority group or people who couldnt obtain them, there will still be people trying to help these people get the ID cards.

Bil_Stunbmun · #**124** (**permalink**) 05-09-2008, 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by World Hegemony

Ha look at you calling us names.

Nothing gets by you, does it?

George O Well · #**125** (**permalink**) 05-09-2008, 11:00 AM

Quote:

The Supreme Court ruled Monday that states can require voters to produce photo identification without violating their constitutional rights, validating Republican-inspired voter ID laws.

>>>Strangely, I agree with this. When is the Republican Supreme Court going to approve a national ID card? When is the Republican Supreme Court going to approve border checkpoints between STATES. That would surely cut down on the number of runaway slaves.

wow · #**126** (**permalink**) 05-09-2008, 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by George O Well

>>>Strangely, I agree with this. When is the Republican Supreme Court going to approve a national ID card? When is the Republican Supreme Court going to approve border checkpoints between STATES. That would surely cut down on the number of runaway slaves.

When is the Republican Supreme Court going to approve border checkpoints between STATES.
This is a good idea!
This will stop voters from voting in more than one state.

reccles44 · #**127** (**permalink**) 05-09-2008, 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BO Nafide

I love this.

How about a simple formula; If you take out more than you put in you don't vote.

You see this is why the Founding Fathers were more interested in "participation" government and freedom of ALL men. And it is also the reason why we don't have any Founding Fathers today. Y'all are way too illogical.

We have people who take out more than they put in because of Liberals. We have people stuck on the government dole because of Liberals. Liberals have given us some of the worst our government has to offer but lets not forget it was a Liberal who began the whole interstate highway system. Sometimes they do have something good to offer.

Just remember, every man who is a proper and legal citizen and of the age of majority should have the right to vote. We should just make sure he is educated in the proper way to vote. Not keep him from voting because when you do that you open the door to the prospect of your vote being limited or eliminated. And I know you would not want that.

Bil_Stunbmun · #**128** (**permalink**) 05-09-2008, 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by George O Well

>>> When is the Republican Supreme Court going to approve border checkpoints between STATES. That would surely cut down on the number of runaway slaves.

You still have slaves in your state?

The evil fascist neocon lying Republicans in my state claim that we Democrats lost the civil war and had to set the slaves free.

Stupid lying Republicans. I'll bet the workers paradise of the Soviet Union is still there, too! We Democrats haven't really lost - the Republicans are lying.

Commissioner · #**129** (**permalink**) 05-09-2008, 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by George O Well

>>>Strangely, I agree with this. When is the Republican Supreme Court going to approve a national ID card? When is the Republican Supreme Court going to approve border checkpoints between STATES. That would surely cut down on the number of runaway slaves.

One thing at a time. In one of your rare displays of intelligence, you are right, however. It's taken awhile to clean out some of the scum that's been sitting on the Supreme Court. Hopefully (though I wouldn't bet on it) McCain will be to finish the job Bush started of putting the court back in order. Who knows, after a national ID card, maybe English will become the national language. And, if it's at all possible for the country to develop a concsience, maybe something can be done about Roe vs. Wade as well.

Not sure where you're coming from with the need for checkpoints between states. Then again, it seems it's impossible for you to add a post on anything that doesn't includes something incredibly stupid.

BO Nafide · #**130** (**permalink**) 05-09-2008, 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by reccles44

You see this is why the Founding Fathers were more interested in "participation" government and freedom of ALL men. And it is also the reason why we don't have any Founding Fathers today. Y'all are way too illogical.

We have people who take out more than they put in because of Liberals. We have people stuck on the government dole because of Liberals. Liberals have given us some of the worst our government has to offer but lets not forget it was a Liberal who began the whole interstate highway system. Sometimes they do have something good to offer.

Just remember, every man who is a proper and legal citizen and of the age of majority should have the right to vote. We should just make sure he is educated in the proper way to vote. Not keep him from voting because when you do that you open the door to the prospect of your vote being limited or eliminated. And I know you would not want that.

If you look at the social context of the mid to late 1700s the idea that the founding fathers had any idea that today we would let ANYBODY and EVERYBODY vote would give them an anurism. They may have believed that all men had rights but they certainly think they were all qualified to vote.