In his little brain he thinks he can marginalize anyone by calling names

radical left wing fuckheads

The reason I like Scalia is because he can believe these things the way he does, but he also is a repectful enough person to be friends and good company with many democrats.

This is one of the most amazing text book examples of projection & delusion I have seen in awhile & trust me that's saying a lot.

Yes there are a % on the 'liberal' side of the debate that do name calling but by & large (especially recently) I have seen & experienced nothing but name calling, insults & threats usually related to;
A. Homosexuality (when that doesn't work)
B. Putting pictures of guns & implying they will shoot you. (when that doesn't work)
C. Threats of calling the F.B.I. on you (when that doesn't work)
D. Pathetic attempts at personal character assassinations.

This site has been a god damned test/text book case of normal O.P. by these by & large republican-like/kinda' conservative if that's what you want to call it, fools on this forum.

Amazed you need to get more grounded in your observation skills.

__________________
The crows seemed to be calling his name, thought Caw.
- Jack Handy

Right wingers try to steal the terminology to their side and make you answer to their skewed interpretation of things. What I call the "original" Constitution is the one that protected the people and stopped rogue political parties from putting in a government that stacks the Supreme Court to the right, practices torture, weakens individual rights and civil liberties, and gives powerful business interests the run of the government. It's fairly dumb to not understand this. That's the whole point of the post - that Scalia has balls to accuse the left of stealing the Constitution when they themselves are in the act of destroying it. It's obvious who is threatening the Constitution here - which is why I said it is probably Scalia's unconscious guilt that drives him to say what he did.

First, the only one who tried to "stack" the Supreme Court unconstitutionally was FDR.

Second, what has Scalia done to destroy the Constitution?

Third, yes obvious, those who want to allow judges to amend the Constitution without going through the states and congress.

Four, I doubt that Scalia has much guilt about anything. Man means what he does and does what he means.

This is one of the most amazing text book examples of projection & delusion I have seen in awhile & trust me that's saying a lot.

Sorry, no. This was really aimed at Jet, but it just as true about others on various websites. You watch Jet and a few others...they toss around Nazi, Hitler,Stalin ect. every time thety count disprove something, or when they get cornered. Not really my problem if you are unable to actually observe the truth.

Yes there are a % on the 'liberal' side of the debate that do name calling but by & large (especially recently) I have seen & experienced nothing but name calling, insults & threats usually related to;
A. Homosexuality (when that doesn't work)
B. Putting pictures of guns & implying they will shoot you. (when that doesn't work)
C. Threats of calling the F.B.I. on you (when that doesn't work)
D. Pathetic attempts at personal character assassinations.

Again, you are obviously blind. Watch Crowley. FedUp, Jet and the others...watch the terms they use....

This site has been a god damned test/text book case of normal O.P. by these by & large republican-like/kinda' conservative if that's what you want to call it, fools on this forum.

Amazed you need to get more grounded in your observation skills.

My observations are spot on.

Right wingers try to steal the terminology to their side and make you answer to their skewed interpretation of things. What I call the "original" Constitution is the one that protected the people and stopped rogue political parties from putting in a government that stacks the Supreme Court to the right, practices torture, weakens individual rights and civil liberties, and gives powerful business interests the run of the government. It's fairly dumb to not understand this. That's the whole point of the post - that Scalia has balls to accuse the left of stealing the Constitution when they themselves are in the act of destroying it. It's obvious who is threatening the Constitution here - which is why I said it is probably Scalia's unconscious guilt that drives him to say what he did.

Textbook Dem talking points. The Left isn't stealing the Constitution, it is trying to completely abrogate it. The typical Left tactic is to "redefine" any word that doesn't fit their iterpretaions of reality...the latest , greatest example is "Patriotism".

No.

I'd say you were projecting.

Nothing you ever say is spot on, either.

Now, Amazed will define "patriotism".