Giuliani honored

Upton · #1 (**permalink**) 12-02-2007, 06:01 PM

Truly a great honor for rotten Rudy, considering most Republicans meet the requirements necessary for eligibility.

Quote:

Rudy Giuliani
GOP Hypocrite of the Week.

A familiar, frightful face emerged to ask one of the YouTube questions during the November 28 St. Petersburg Republican debate: Grover Norquist. He queried the candidates if they would pledge not to raise taxes during their presidency.

Rudolph Giuliani didn't hesitate in his response. Would he take the "Norquist pledge" not to raise taxes?

" Yes, I would," declared Giuliani. "I did it as mayor. I would do it as the president. I had one of the best records in the country for lowering taxes while I was mayor. I expect to have a great record as president."

On the same day that Giuliani cavalierly caved into the Republican prerequisite for holding public office -- "no new taxes" -- Politico.com ran an investigative article revealing that Rudy spent -- and hid -- expenses for his extramarital trysts with Judith Nathan in Southampton.

At the time, Rudy G. was married to Donna Hanover, his second wife, and conducting an adulterous affair with Judith, who would become his third wife after he unceremoniously dumped Hanover during a City Hall news conference.

The tax-related issue lying between Rudy's roaming bed sheets is that he hid the security detail and other expenses for his sexual escapades in obscure city departments where he thought that no one would discover them. But they've come out in the sunshine now.

So, Rudy pledges not to raise taxes, while he dismisses the notion that he used New York taxpayer money so that he could get his rocks off on the weekend with his then-mistress!

Now, that's a whole lot of "no tax" hypocrisy from a man whose disingenuousness is only exceeded by the size of his ego.

New Yorkers got stiffed, so to speak, with paying for Rudy's out of marriage sex -- and he tells all of America that he won't raise anybody's taxes. Oh yeah, but he'll spend our money for his personal needs, without hesitation -- and then try to hide it.

Rudy G., you are truly the BuzzFlash GOP Hypocrite of the Week.

Remember our motto: So many Republican hypocrites, so little time.

Catch up with you soon.

Remember our motto: So many Republican hypocrites, so little time.

Rudy Giuliani is BuzzFlash.com's GOP Hypocrite of the Week

Still Dizzy · #2 (**permalink**) 12-02-2007, 06:44 PM

It is hard to match the ethics of a Bill Clinton isn't it?

RASTAMAN · #3 (**permalink**) 12-02-2007, 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Still Dizzy

It is hard to match the ethics of a Bill Clinton isn't it?

WHO'S MORE ETHICAL? BILL CLINTON OR G.W. BUSH!

migueld · #4 (**permalink**) 12-04-2007, 08:20 PM

Rudy Giuliani's false image as a conservative is further debunked by his pining over globalist-kingpin David Rockefeller as he presents him with a medal from the Business Council of the United Nations circa 1994.

Giuliani thanks him personally for his "contributions to world peace," and listed amongst his influential activities membership organizations including the CFR, the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group (yes, Giuliani mentions this secretive group) and the Americas Society.

David Rockefeller has done a great deal as an individual to subvert sovereignty and shrink the United States' ability to continue what he condemns as "auto-determination." Furthermore, the organizations listed by Giuliani work specifically to exert and maintain extra-national influence and are anything but patriotic, and instead aim to dissolve borders in favor of control by world bodies.

This is further evidence that, while Giuliani is not a formal member of the Council on Foreign Relations, he is well within their sphere of influence. And as he apparently regards these groups, and Mr. Rockefeller in particular, as a "force for freedom and peace in the world," the valid question is raised-- whose interests would he serve.

Giuliani recently confirmed that he spoken before the CFR and sees "nothing wrong" with belonging to the organization. Ron Paul is the only presidential candidate in either party with any vitality that has no affiliation with the CFR, and has proposed a think tank to counter the heavy influence of the CFR's intellectual crowd.

YouTube - Giuliani - The fix is in

"Some even believe we (the Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure---one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."
--David Rockefeller, Memoirs, page 405

babetoo · #5 (**permalink**) 12-04-2007, 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RASTAMAN

WHO'S MORE ETHICAL? BILL CLINTON OR G.W. BUSH!

clinton, i think

babe

#6 (**permalink**) 12-05-2007, 12:10 AM

The bad polling news is hitting Rudy in waves right about now. There's the new Washington Post poll, which finds him at his lowest point this year:

Giuliani's support dropped from 37 percent in a July poll to 28 percent in the latest survey, and his decline from February has been even more sharp. Then, he had the backing of 53 percent of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents and had a better than 2 to 1 advantage over his closest rival.

...and the new Los Angeles Times poll, which finds him in trouble in crucial early primary states:

wkwally · #7 (**permalink**) 12-05-2007, 12:47 AM

and you belive the LA times JEEEEEZE. I will tell you who I belive I will stick with someone who at least has the nerve to protect this country and I will stick with Bush in that. Clinton suuuureeeeeeee open up the borders. Lets have one big kegger and let the illegals trash the country and let those who wish to do us harm have a field day. while we are at it be sure to pat Osama on the back and tell him what a great job he did. DO I totally agree with Bush, No but at least he had the nerve to do something about the threats out there. Was he right in how we went into Iraq, No. But we were going to have to go in there in the long run and take that joker out so it only happened sooner than we would have liked to think. Better now than if we waited and really let them get a foot hold and prepare for us. You think the troop death toll is high now just think how high it would have been if we waited. But keep listening to the liberial press and going along without commen sence and see where it get us.

Petey · #8 (**permalink**) 12-05-2007, 07:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wkwally

and you belive the LA times JEEEEEZE. I will tell you who I belive I will stick with someone who at least has the nerve to protect this country and I will stick with Bush in that. Clinton suuuureeeeeeee open up the borders. Lets have one big kegger and let the illegals trash the country and let those who wish to do us harm have a field day. while we are at it be sure to pat Osama on the back and tell him what a great job he did. DO I totally agree with Bush, No but at least he had the nerve to do something about the threats out there. Was he right in how we went into Iraq, No. But we were going to have to go in there in the long run and take that joker out so it only happened sooner than we would have liked to think. Better now than if we waited and really let them get a foot hold and prepare for us. You think the troop death toll is high now just think how high it would have been if we waited. But keep listening to the liberial press and going along without commen sence and see where it get us.

I have to disagree with you wkwally. The Bushs and the Clintons are one family.....one party. They both follow order from the elite.

As for Iraq, there was no need for us to go in there and take out that joker. That joker was no threat to us and i dont believe that our offspring be disposable only to spread democracy across the world. As for OBL he is just a patsy . Both Clinton and Bush have no desire to capture him either.
Also, preemptive war is Un-American.

As for bush doing something about threats......I see Bush as the threat to this country more than anything. Do you realize that millions of jobs were lost in America during Bush and Clinton administration. Both of those bastards belong to the same party......both are drug abusers & Alcoholics.

wkwally · #9 (**permalink**) 12-05-2007, 08:44 AM

I guess you did not read your US history very well, do you think that this is the first war that we started in our history? read a little. And I also guess that you are one of those who belive that 911 never happened or was staged by the elite?

Petey · #10 (**permalink**) 12-05-2007, 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wkwally

I guess you did not read your US history very well, do you think that this is the first war that we started in our history? read a little. And I also guess that you are one of those who belive that 911 never happened or was staged by the elite?

Preemptive war is Un-American.