Iraqis Return Home! Liberals Are Desperate!

RASTAMAN · #21 (**permalink**) 12-01-2007, 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neo Con Hardy

There are many of todays Left Wing Loony Anti America Liberals that are upset and angry because America was on the Winning Side of WWII

The illegal occupation and war crimes in Iraq has nothing to do with WWII!!!

freedomlover · #22 (**permalink**) 12-01-2007, 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RASTAMAN

The illegal occupation and war crimes in Iraq has nothing to do with WWII!!!

Forget it Rasta. You will never convince some people that there is a huge difference between defending yourself and instagating(pre-emptive) war. You'll never convince some people going after a threat and creating a threat. You'll never convince some people that in order to fight a "war on terror", one must ACTUALLY go after the terrorists, and PROTECT the homefront.

ONEWHITEDUCK · #23 (**permalink**) 12-01-2007, 06:31 PM

SOME PEOPLE YOU'LL NEVER GET TO ACKNOWLEDGE OPERATION MOCKINBIRD AND FEMINISM TOO.

Live Search: FLAWED SCIENCE and A DOCTOR IN EVERY POT

Live Search: OPERATIN MOCKINGBIRD and FEMINISM

BUT THEY WILL IGNORE IT AND CALL YOU A CONSPIRACY "NUT"

Live Search: PSYCHIATRY and the CIA

ehehehehehehehehehehehehe

RIGHT FREEDOM :-(

RASTAMAN · #24 (**permalink**) 12-01-2007, 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freedomlover

Forget it Rasta. You will never convince some people that there is a huge difference between defending yourself and instagating(pre-emptive) war. You'll never convince some people going after a threat and creating a threat. You'll never convince some people that in order to fight a "war on terror", one must ACTUALLY go after the terrorists, and PROTECT the homefront.

I know Freedom.

Badmutha · #25 (**permalink**) 12-01-2007, 11:17 PM

Lets face reality--Libs would rather see headlines like "Iraqi's leaving Iraq". But have faith all thee of no faith--If the Benedict Murtha can see victory looming on the horizon--rest assured a lot of liberals are shitting their pants. The democrat's investment in defeat might not pay off--a US Victory was they last thing they wanted.

sachem · #26 (**permalink**) 12-01-2007, 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Badmutha

Lets face reality--Libs would rather see headlines like "Iraqi's leaving Iraq". But have faith all thee of no faith--If the Benedict Murtha can see victory looming on the horizon--rest assured a lot of liberals are shitting their pants. The democrat's investment in defeat might not pay off--a US Victory was they last thing they wanted.

Oh please, grow up. We would have preferred no need for "victory" (no war), but of course we would like to see something positive come out of this mess. I think "victory" is the wrong word to use no matter how this turns out.BTW, the real "Benedicts" in this mess are the people who caused the needless deaths of thousands.

crowonapost · #27 (**permalink**) 12-02-2007, 12:39 AM

"We've gone from horrific levels of murder to very bad," analyst notes. Everythings going great!!! It's improved!!!
It's not dismally drill bits in your heads horrific it's just kinder gentler
savage beatings in the basement of the Ministry of Health headquarters bad.

It's really great!

Mission accomplished!

Let's go home.

Badmutha · #28 (**permalink**) 12-02-2007, 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sachem

Oh please, grow up. We would have preferred no need for "victory" (no war), but of course we would like to see something positive come out of this mess. I think "victory" is the wrong word to use no matter how this turns out.

I guess I cant sway your opinion Sac--but maybe one of your own flock. Recently when a democrat congressman was asked "What would victory in Iraq mean to your party?"--the congressman (D) replied "That would prove to be a BIG problem for us"

Rest assured on this one--DEMOCRATS ARE INVESTED IN DEFEAT--and they hate any bit of good news that comes from Iraq.

Quote:

BTW, the real "Benedicts" in this mess are the people who caused the needless deaths of thousands.

Does that include Sadam? Sadam had the chance to avoid this war--to cooperate--but he declined--and he got the horns. He also murdered millions of his own people prior to us stepping foot in Iraq--but screw those innocent people right. If only Sadam was alive so he could run on the same ticket as Hitlary--but since he's dead--Zawahiri will have to do.

sachem · #29 (**permalink**) 12-02-2007, 01:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Badmutha

I guess I cant sway your opinion Sac--but maybe one of your own flock. Recently when a democrat congressman was asked "What would victory in Iraq mean to your party?"--the congressman (D) replied "That would prove to be a BIG problem for us"

Rest assured on this one--DEMOCRATS ARE INVESTED IN DEFEAT--and they hate any bit of good news that comes from Iraq.

Does that include Sadam? Sadam had the chance to avoid this war--to cooperate--but he declined--and he got the horns. He also murdered millions of his own people prior to us stepping foot in Iraq--but screw those innocent people right. If only Sadam was alive so he could run on the same ticket as Hitlary--but since he's dead--Zawahiri will have to do.

So our policy is to invade any country that does not cooperate with us/UN and/or where the government is responsible for the death of thousands of its citizens? We are going to be busy.

crowonapost · #30 (**permalink**) 12-02-2007, 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Badmutha

Does that include Sadam? Sadam had the chance to avoid this war--to cooperate--but he declined--and he got the horns. He also murdered millions of his own people prior to us stepping foot in Iraq--but screw those innocent people right. If only Sadam was alive so he could run on the same ticket as Hitlary--but since he's dead--Zawahiri will have to do.

I didn't know Sadam was a citizen of our country...wow. Huh more Badhistoryrevisionstha'
I guess all our two bit dictators we've supported throughout the years that killed tons of citizens should have ALL been taken out...

Abacha, General Sani Nigeria
Amin, Idi Uganda
Banzer, Colonel Hugo Bolivia
Batista, Fulgencio Cuba
Bolkiah, Sir Hassanal Brunei
Botha, P.W. South Africa
Branco, General Humberto Brazil
Cedras, Raoul Haiti
Cerezo, Vinicio Guatemala
Chiang Kai-Shek Taiwan
Cordova, Roberto Suazo Honduras
Christiani, Alfredo El Salvador
Diem, Ngo Dihn Vietnam
Doe, General Samuel Liberia
Duvalier, Francois Haiti
Duvalier, Jean Claude Haiti
Fahd bin'Abdul-'Aziz, King Saudi Arabia
Franco, General Francisco Spain
Hitler, Adolf Germany
Hassan II Morocco
Marcos, Ferdinand Philippines
Martinez, General Maximiliano Hernandez El Salvador
Mobutu Sese Seko Zaire

Montt, General Efrain Rios
Guatemala
Noriega, General Manuel Panama
Ozal, Turgut Turkey
Pahlevi, Shah Mohammed Reza Iran
Papadopoulos, George Greece
Park Chung Hee South Korea
Pinochet, General Augusto Chile
Pol Pot Cambodia
Rabuka, General Sitiveni Fiji
Montt, General Efrain Rios Guatemala
Salassie, Halie Ethiopia
Salazar, Antonio de Oliveira Portugal
Somoza, Anastasio Jr. Nicaragua
Somoza, Anastasio, Sr. Nicaragua
Smith, Ian Rhodesia
Stroessner, Alfredo Paraguay
Suharto, General Indonesia
Trujillo, Rafael Leonidas Dominican Republic
Videla, General Jorge Rafael Argentina
Zia Ul-Haq, Mohammed Pakistan

Huh guess we aren't so moral on that but then again according to 'badhistoryrevisionstha's Sadam was a US Citizen...hence the Benadicting part.

& all those others were our close personal friends. Yay.

Hey badhistoryrevisionstha' since Sadam never complied how come we haven't found all those un-complied weapons of mass destruction or has this ALL been a WEAPON OF MASS DISTRACTION?

Who cares we Won right?!!!
Check out my 'flight uniform' on my super carrier he he.

We're still wining he he 3 years later he he.