Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > News and Current Events > Politics in the News

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2007, 01:27 AM
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 970
Default LMAO from Newsday

Judith Giuliani’s biggest drawback—her three marriages—reminds voters of Rudy’s own three and the associated tawdry drama. The first, to his second cousin, was annulled after fourteen years. His second, to Hanover, ended with Rudy’s televised May 2000 announcement that he intended to separate from her; Hanover’s shocked, tearful, also-televised response blamed Rudy’s “relationship with one staff member,” i.e., his communications director Cristyne Lategano. That was before much was known about Judith. By the summer of 2001, Judith’s face, along with Donna’s and Rudy’s, was plastered on the cover of People magazine with the tawdry headline INSIDE NEW YORK’S NASTIEST SPLIT … THE MAYOR, THE WIFE, THE MISTRESS.

and

It’s no surprise to veteran Rudy watchers that in recent weeks, senior presidential-campaign operatives have apparently been grumbling about what they consider Judith’s meddling in matters outside her areas of competence. “She’s, uh, feisty, as they say,” a high-level supporter told Newsday. “The staff people go a little nuts.”

The story of Manny Papir is a cautionary tale for anyone who doubts that Judith Giuliani is a force to be reckoned with. Papir, Rudy’s longtime personal aide, learned the hard way during a trip to Europe when Rudy, taking a 9/11 victory lap in early 2002, was knighted by Queen Elizabeth II and then was honored with the German Media Prize in Baden-Baden. Among Rudy’s inner circle, Judith was fast becoming known for her demanding requirements. Even loyalist Sunny Mindel was overheard joking that whenever they arranged a chartered jet for their principal and his companion, “we need two seats for Judith—one for her and one for her Gucci bag.”
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2007, 01:28 AM
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 970
Default

I like watching you wiggle around defending Judy. LMAO.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2007, 01:32 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 13,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Robinson View Post
I like watching you wiggle around defending Judy. LMAO.

I am not defending her dummy. I am saying she is irrelevant. Big difference. Thought I would put it in bold so maybe it would help you understand. I already stated that First spouses were not important to me, but you didn't get it, which comes as little surprise.

You are the one who defends your double standards. See, when people employ double standards then there really is no reason to believe what they say because it will always be aprtisan - they have no real views of their own.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2007, 01:35 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 13,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Robinson View Post
Even loyalist Sunny Mindel was overheard joking that whenever they arranged a chartered jet for their principal and his companion, “we need two seats for Judith—one for her and one for her Gucci bag.”

See what I mean? Irrelevant. Did you mind when Bill's First Lady was calling people niggers and jews? Was that a character flaw that reflected her husband? See, it doesn't matter. The very fact that you think it does matter tells a lot about you and your thought process.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2007, 01:36 AM
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 970
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom1 View Post
She wouldn't be making policy and she wasn't elected to make policy. You are trying to argue that Bill Clinton would be an asset because of this precise reason. Fact is, it isn't an eleced postiion nor is a position by appointment. A spouse as a sounding board, that is what this amounts to, and you left out the part where he mentioned only if it were relevant. I am sure it was unintentional on your part.

They play public roles, just like other First ladies have done. Every once in a while they will have a cause they work for. Go back and read a few books and see for yoruself if you don't believe me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Robinson View Post
Rudy seems to think so. He said Judy could be part of cabinet meetings and give advice on federal policy.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/30/us...cs/30judy.html

In His White House, Giuliani Says, His Wife Might Have a Very Visible Role

By RICHARD PÉREZ-PEÑA
Published: March 30, 2007
Rudolph W. Giuliani says that if he were president, his wife would be permitted to attend cabinet meetings and advise him on federal policy, an unusually overt role in government decision-making for a first lady.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Robinson View Post
Asked whether his wife would sit in on Cabinet meetings, Giuliani said, "If she wanted to. If they were relevant to something that she was interested in. I mean that would be something that I'd be very, very comfortable with."

Shit you just pointed out something I did miss. The revelant part! Judy gets to decide what is relevant according to Rudy! LMAO. Here is his quote on what would be relevant. Whatever Judy thinks. LMAO. Six marriages numerous affairs celebrity PR briefngs. You gotta love these family values.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom1 View Post
It is like Nancy Reagan and her "Just say no" or a literacy progam and shit like that. She is already involved in things such as this and all the recent first ladies have all done things like this. You are attempting to say that she will be making policy in America which is totally false. You must be really scared that Giuliani can win. Rosalynn Carter sat in on Cabinet meetings, you have no problem with that even though you have already expressed your love affait with the Carter presidency.

Plus, you found the first article on this, I was wondering if you would ever get around to the second. I didn't figure that you would.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom1 View Post
Keep laughing while you don't post what else Rudy says about her involvement. I usually like to see people go on and on about this stuff when they aren't telling the whole story.

BTW, did you see where Edwards puts Hillary right up there with the neocons? Guess I was right on the money, eh Jack?
LMAO I am enjoying my beer and watching you sputter defending Judy and trying to say she would be like Nancy Reagan. You are toast tonight. You know you lost this if you want to bring candidates pokes at each other competing for the nomination it shows your desperation. What the fuck does Edwards and have to do with first spouces.LMAO!

So if candidates in competition shit talk means so much to you Romney also pointed out Guiliani's tacky wife and six marriages and numerous affairs on Meet the Press.So back on the subject pal .
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2007, 01:44 AM
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 970
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Robinson View Post
Rudy seems to think so. He said Judy could be part of cabinet meetings and give advice on federal policy.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/30/us...cs/30judy.html

In His White House, Giuliani Says, His Wife Might Have a Very Visible Role

By RICHARD PÉREZ-PEÑA
Published: March 30, 2007
Rudolph W. Giuliani says that if he were president, his wife would be permitted to attend cabinet meetings and advise him on federal policy, an unusually overt role in government decision-making for a first lady.
You say she is not relevant but Rudy says something different.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2007, 02:26 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 13,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Robinson View Post
LMAO I am enjoying my beer and watching you sputter defending Judy and trying to say she would be like Nancy Reagan. You are toast tonight. You know you lost this if you want to bring candidates pokes at each other competing for the nomination it shows your desperation. What the fuck does Edwards and have to do with first spouces.LMAO!

So if candidates in competition shit talk means so much to you Romney also pointed out Guiliani's tacky wife and six marriages and numerous affairs on Meet the Press.So back on the subject pal .
You can't seem to understand very well, can you? I specifically staed I am not defending her and am saying she is irrelvant, which she is.

Desperation is posting things about Gucci bags and thinking they matter.

Besides, what the fuck do First spouses have to do with elections???? You said yourself that you didn't judge based on who the First Lady was, but you seem awfully concerned. Of course, you do display a lot of double standards, so maybe it jsut matter to you sometimes.

Edwards has to do with Hillary being a neocon, I thought you might enjoy that because I noticed you failed to make an appearance on the thread where I posted it. I remember your fumbling defense of Hillary not being a neocon, so I thought yo might enjoy hearing that Edwards said she was.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2007, 02:34 AM
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 970
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom1 View Post
You can't seem to understand very well, can you? I specifically staed I am not defending her and am saying she is irrelvant, which she is.

Desperation is posting things about Gucci bags and thinking they matter.

Besides, what the fuck do First spouses have to do with elections???? You said yourself that you didn't judge based on who the First Lady was, but you seem awfully concerned. Of course, you do display a lot of double standards, so maybe it jsut matter to you sometimes.

Edwards has to do with Hillary being a neocon, I thought you might enjoy that because I noticed you failed to make an appearance on the thread where I posted it. I remember your fumbling defense of Hillary not being a neocon, so I thought yo might enjoy hearing that Edwards said she was.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Robinson View Post
Rudy seems to think so. He said Judy could be part of cabinet meetings and give advice on federal policy.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/30/us...cs/30judy.html

In His White House, Giuliani Says, His Wife Might Have a Very Visible Role

By RICHARD PÉREZ-PEÑA
Published: March 30, 2007
Rudolph W. Giuliani says that if he were president, his wife would be permitted to attend cabinet meetings and advise him on federal policy, an unusually overt role in government decision-making for a first lady.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Robinson View Post
Asked whether his wife would sit in on Cabinet meetings, Giuliani said, "If she wanted to. If they were relevant to something that she was interested in. I mean that would be something that I'd be very, very comfortable with."

Shit you just pointed out something I did miss. The revelant part! Judy gets to decide what is relevant according to Rudy! LMAO. Here is his quote on what would be relevant. Whatever Judy thinks. LMAO. Six marriages numerous affairs celebrity PR briefngs. You gotta love these family values.
Rudy disagrees with you. He says she will advise him on policy.You want her to be irrelevent but Rudy has different plans. I guess you do not like your boys inner circle.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2007, 03:06 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 13,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Robinson View Post
Rudy disagrees with you. He says she will advise him on policy.You want her to be irrelevent but Rudy has different plans. I guess you do not like your boys inner circle.
You still haven't found that second article liar Jack.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2007, 03:14 AM
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 970
Default

LMAO you are defending Judy and saying Rudy does not mean what he says about her. Man some people will say anything out of desperation . I can see you sputter even after I've had a few beers.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


» Navigation

Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!


$5 monthly donation:

$10 monthly donation:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0