Hanging Saddam would cause chaos

oceanbreeze · #1 (**permalink**) 10-06-2006, 01:19 AM

Saddam deserves to be hung, but I do think it would cause chaos.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061006/...clark_saddam_5

Kix · #2 (**permalink**) 10-06-2006, 01:26 AM

What we need is another General Black Jack Pershing. That would take care of the chaos.

Gulf war 1 vet · #3 (**permalink**) 10-06-2006, 07:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kix

What we need is another General Black Jack Pershing. That would take care of the chaos.

What we really need is a President who is capable of doing the job, if the mission of GW1 was completed we wouldn't have the mess we have today. I felt cheated in '91'92, the administration didnt have the balls to finish off Saddam back then.

r8dmarshall · #4 (**permalink**) 10-06-2006, 08:09 AM

They did not even have them to destroy the republican guard. May be the name had something to do with that, LOL.

One reason we are not thought of well by the sheites is the fact that Stormin was hoodwinked and allowed gunships of Hussain's to cut down the Kurds and others that Bush had asked to stand up and overthrow Saddam. Many thousand of them were slautered in the name of Bush seinor. I will never forget that of him.

Gulf war 1 vet · #5 (**permalink**) 10-06-2006, 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by r8dmarshall

They did not even have them to destroy the republican guard. May be the name had something to do with that, LOL.

One reason we are not thought of well by the sheites is the fact that Stormin was hoodwinked and allowed gunships of Hussain's to cut down the Kurds and others that Bush had asked to stand up and overthrow Saddam. Many thousand of them were slautered in the name of Bush seinor. I will never forget that of him.

The iraqi people were lead to believe that the USA was ready to back them in a civil war against Saddam, yeah they started to fight Saddam, but where were we, our task force was headed back to Frisco, we promised but we didnt deliver. Now we except the Iraqi people to support us, ha.

Areyouforreal · #6 (**permalink**) 10-06-2006, 08:29 AM

To hang or not to hang that is the question.
I say imprison him for life, that way it will take longer to get those virgins

Gulf war 1 vet · #7 (**permalink**) 10-06-2006, 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Areyouforreal

To hang or not to hang that is the question.
I say imprison him for life, that way it will take longer to get those virgins

ha ha ha ha I like your sense of humour!

oceanbreeze · #8 (**permalink**) 10-06-2006, 09:06 AM

Good one, Real.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Areyouforreal

To hang or not to hang that is the question.
I say imprison him for life, that way it will take longer to get those virgins

Kix · #9 (**permalink**) 10-06-2006, 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Areyouforreal

To hang or not to hang that is the question.
I say imprison him for life, that way it will take longer to get those virgins

I was kind of thinking more along the lines of them secretly inducing a coma and putting his icky butt on life support. That would prevent him from dying of any natural causes he might have come up and it would give a little insurance that no one would try to storm the prison and set him free somewhere down the road.

Kix · #10 (**permalink**) 10-06-2006, 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gulf war 1 vet

What we really need is a President who is capable of doing the job, if the mission of GW1 was completed we wouldn't have the mess we have today. I felt cheated in '91'92, the administration didnt have the balls to finish off Saddam back then.

But, did GW1 have the backing he needed back then? I know current GW2 sure doesn't. This war has been used as fodder for every argument by the left since the day it began, and blamed for every problem in the country, up to and including Pelosi's latest rump side pimple outbreak.