Great line from Law & Order

Areyouforreal · #21 (**permalink**) 05-15-2007, 01:52 PM

No George is a racist and Petey is not.

SydneySteel · #22 (**permalink**) 05-15-2007, 03:29 PM

The Jews put Bush in office? What a surprise....I thought ALL of them were liberal Democrats....Hmmm.....Speaking of which, I've always wondered why that is. One would think that Jewish people would be conservatives, but by and large they are not. And, yet, according to George OWell, they elected Bush to the presidency. Curiouser and curiouser.....

RASTAMAN · #23 (**permalink**) 05-15-2007, 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SydneySteel

When a young, female executive of a Hollywood Studio ratted out her boss to the prosecutors, the cop asked her why she was doing it, was she leaving Hollywood? She replied, "Yes, I'm sick of the whole industry. THEY TALK LIKE HIPPIES AND ACT LIKE THE SICILIAN MAFIA." That's a very good description of the left in general imo.

Yawn-Yawn, at least these LIBERAL Hollywood Executives allow conservatives to chase their dreams and become actors. Hell, Hollywood even allows below average conservative actors like "Fred Thompson" to bore liberal audiences to death on "LAW AND ORDER"!!!

ISN'T LIBERAL AMERICA GREAT!!!

RASTAMAN · #24 (**permalink**) 05-15-2007, 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SydneySteel

The Jews put Bush in office? What a surprise....I thought ALL of them were liberal Democrats....Hmmm.....Speaking of which, I've always wondered why that is. One would think that Jewish people would be conservatives, but by and large they are not. And, yet, according to George OWell, they elected Bush to the presidency. Curiouser and curiouser.....

WRONG!!!.....The Supreme Court Put Bush in Office the first time. The second time Diebold voting machines put Bush in Office!

SydneySteel · #25 (**permalink**) 05-15-2007, 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RASTAMAN

WRONG!!!.....The Supreme Court Put Bush in Office the first time. The second time Diebold voting machines put Bush in Office!

Yeah, yeah, I know....You are wiser than the collective Supreme Court, the FBI, the CIA, and all of the people who did vote for him. Everyone got it wrong but you. So, since you are so "in the know" and so brilliant, have you corrected these errors yet in preparation for 2008? I guess if a Democrat wins the problems have been corrected, ey? If a conservative wins, then the Diebold machines and the Supreme Court will still be corrupt, right? Geez! Do you have delusions of grandeur or what?

Areyouforreal · #26 (**permalink**) 05-15-2007, 07:16 PM

Well if what Rasta says is true then it will be a Republican for President in 2008.
Here that Dems no need to vote it doesn't matter anyway.

SydneySteel · #27 (**permalink**) 05-15-2007, 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Areyouforreal

Well if what Rasta says is true then it will be a Republican for President in 2008.
Here that Dems no need to vote it doesn't matter anyway.

Most of the what the anti-Bush people do is contradict themselves. On the one hand, GWB is a "bumbling, stumbling, stupid village idiot." And in almost the same breath they accuse him of masterminding or at the least carrying off, the most brilliantly executed hoaxes of our time and appear to be getting away with it. I guess the bumbling, stumbling stuff is just a facade to keep his followers forgiving him and his detractors attempting to prove that he is BOTH....a village idiot and an evil Stephen Hawking.

RASTAMAN · #28 (**permalink**) 05-15-2007, 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SydneySteel

Yeah, yeah, I know....You are wiser than the collective Supreme Court, the FBI, the CIA, and all of the people who did vote for him. Everyone got it wrong but you. So, since you are so "in the know" and so brilliant, have you corrected these errors yet in preparation for 2008? I guess if a Democrat wins the problems have been corrected, ey? If a conservative wins, then the Diebold machines and the Supreme Court will still be corrupt, right? Geez! Do you have delusions of grandeur or what?

Well actually Sydney, the only way you can truly attempt to come out ahead with the Rove Republican Strategy of voter fraud and election fraud is to make them steal the elections BIG; in other words, Democratic voters will need to come out in mass and vote in numbers not seen before.

Although the Republican hacks hired to write the programming script software for Diebold voting machines to flip the voting intent of the voters; these programmers will have difficulty in not only writing the correct programming script to flip votes, but also risk exposure to their scheme should their candidates victory becomes so lopsided b/c the incorrect script was written that the obvious is there for the world to see.

The problem with e-voting is that by the time it is possible to prove that an election was rigged, the wrong candidate can be sworn in, after which there is no remedy. While Diebold has received the most attention, it actually isn't the biggest maker of computerized election machines. That honor goes to Omaha-based ES&S, and its Republican roots may be even stronger than Diebold's

You may be happy about the results in 2000 and 2004, which include torture, war crimes, the biggest deficit in history, the elimination of checks and balances in government, etc., but they are the results of fraudulent election practices that cannot be proven until it is much too late to do anything about it.

The problem here is that many right wing conservatives will say, "We stole it fair and square--get over it." My argument is that we need hand-counted paper ballots so that the "Rovian Enablers" can't steal any more elections.

SydneySteel · #29 (**permalink**) 05-15-2007, 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RASTAMAN

Well actually Sydney, the only way you can truly attempt to come out ahead with the Rove Republican Strategy of voter fraud and election fraud is to make them steal the elections BIG; in other words, Democratic voters will need to come out in mass and vote in numbers not seen before.

Although the Republican hacks hired to write the programming script software for Diebold voting machines to flip the voting intent of the voters; these programmers will have difficulty in not only writing the correct programming script to flip votes, but also risk exposure to their scheme should their candidates victory becomes so lopsided b/c the incorrect script was written that the obvious is there for the world to see.

The problem with e-voting is that by the time it is possible to prove that an election was rigged, the wrong candidate can be sworn in, after which there is no remedy. While Diebold has received the most attention, it actually isn't the biggest maker of computerized election machines. That honor goes to Omaha-based ES&S, and its Republican roots may be even stronger than Diebold's

You may be happy about the results in 2000 and 2004, which include torture, war crimes, the biggest deficit in history, the elimination of checks and balances in government, etc., but they are the results of fraudulent election practices that cannot be proven until it is much too late to do anything about it.

The problem here is that many right wing conservatives will say, "We stole it fair and square--get over it." My argument is that we need hand-counted paper ballots so that the "Rovian Enablers" can't steal any more elections.

Rasta, are you familiar with the Electoral College? They elect the President, not us. Their votes are usually in line with their constituents, but they don't have to be. If it's way too far out of alignment, they can demand a recall or recount, but that has never happened as far as I know. And, they don't cast their votes by evote. In fact, not all of the citizens votes are counted in even a Presidential election if it is deemed unnecessary. Electoral College....Not Diebold.