Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > Lobby

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2008, 12:52 AM
KokomoJoJo's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,582
Default Hey Americans! Which Citizen Are You? This is a must for ALL to know!!!!!!!!

Which Citizen Are You?

Nov. 1989
by Richard McDonald

(PP) Date Line - America

What kind of citizen are you? Are you a 14th Amendment
federal citizen, or are you a Citizen of the several States, as
described in the Constitution as it was originally intended by
the Founding Fathers?
Are you aware that there exists in this
Nation two separate and distinct classes of citizenship?

To begin with, I must define what the definition that the
Original Constitution used when it referred to the "Citizens."

The phrase "Citizen of the United States" had a specific
meaning in the Original Constitution for the United States of
America (1787), the definition and intent of the Constitution was
that it described a "free born Citizen of the several States."
The 14th Amendment added a second (2nd) distinct meaning to this
phrase. So now, the phrase "Citizen of the United States" has
two separate and distinct meanings which are not compatible with
each other and indeed in a later issue will be shown to be at
odds with one another. They are:

1. A free born White State Citizen in the several States,
is an individual whose inalienable rights are recognized,
secured, and protected by the various State Constitutions against
State actions and against federal intrusion by the Constitution
for the United States of America(1787).

2. The 14th Amendment federal citizen, who is a second
class citizen, a juristic person, a citizen of foreign or
interstate commerce, one who has congressionally granted
privileges that are almost equal to the White Citizen.
I say
almost because these privileges are secured against a debt of
submission
to the morality legislated by Congress (including
Income Tax)
. These individuals are subjects of Congress (alieni
juris), under their protection as a "resident" of a State, a
person enfranchised to the Federal Government (the incorporated
United States defined in Article I, section 8, clause 17.)
The
individual States may not deny to these persons any federal
privileges or immunities that Congress has granted to them. This
specific class of citizens is a federal citizen under admiralty
(International Law).
As such they do not have unalienable common
rights recognized, secured and protected in the Constitutions of
the States, or of the United States of America (1787), such as
allodial rights to property, the right to inheritance, the
unalienable rights to work and contract, the right to travel,
life, liberty and happiness among many others.


Thus the federal citizen is a taxable entity such as any
other corporation, and is subject to pay an excise tax for the
privileges that Congress has granted them.


The White De Jure Citizen is a State Citizen by birth and
race (the Common Law) first, then as a consequence of his State
Citizenship, he is a "Citizen of the United States of America"
second. He owes his allegiance to his State of Domicile first,
and then to the Union of the several States.

The 14th Amendment citizen is a de facto citizen, a "citizen
of the United States" (corporate citizen of the District of
Columbia, its territories, and federal enclaves per Article I,
section 8, clause 17) first, as a consequence of this
citizenship, he is allowed to be a resident within the several
States. For this and other privileges he owes his allegiance to
the United States (corporation per Article I, section 8, clause
17) first, then to the State of his residence.


Note that "Domicile" and "residence" are not synonymous.
See Black's Law Dictionary, 5th Ed.

The Internal Revenue Code's definition of the term "citizen"
is identical to the wording of the 14th Amendment, and can only
apply to the subjects of Congress.
The Social Security Number
(SSN), a badge of slavery, is the main registration number of the de facto 14th Amendment citizen, so Congress can tax their subjects (slaves) wherever they are resident.


NOW, which citizen are YOU? a White State Citizen or a de facto resident?


You must decide -- this is a personal decision
-- and notify the appropriate government officials of your status
with respect to them. Be prepared though -- the United States
(District of Columbia) does not want their slaves to escape. If
they did, the profit of the Federal Reserve would dry up and you
might lead the Exodus out of Egypt.


////////////////////////////////////////////////////


Now that you are saying to yourselves that I am full of shit feast yer lil ole eyes on this!

Verified Statement Challenging Grand Jury Selection Policy:

In the fundamental law, the notion of a "citizen of the
United States" simply did not exist before the 14th Amendment;
at best, this notion is a fiction within a fiction. In
discussing the power of the States to naturalize, the California
State Supreme Court put it rather
bluntly when it ruled that there was no such thing as a "citizen of the United States":


A citizen of any one of the States of the union, is held to
be, and called a citizen of the United States, although
technically and abstractly there is no such thing. To
conceive a citizen of the United States who is not a citizen
of some one of the States, is totally foreign to the idea,
and inconsistent with the proper construction and common
understanding of the expression as used in the Constitution,
which must be deduced from its various other provisions.
The object then to be attained, by the exercise of the power
of naturalization, was to make citizens of the respective
States.
[Ex Parte Knowles, 5 Cal. 300 (1855)]

This decision has never been overturned!



So peeps of AWE sound off! Which "citizen" are you? (and are you happy with your citizenship or could things be a lot better? Does your government work for you or lead you? Do they listen to you or do you listen to them? I wonder if there are any Sovereigns on the board? I am betting not.

So is it time to take an interest in "Law"?

Whatcha all think about that? Is this all bull posted by a fanatic conspiracy theorist or are you paying those federal taxes because you love the irs so much?

.

Last edited by KokomoJoJo; 09-05-2008 at 01:04 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2008, 09:54 AM
jebe's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: somewhere between a rock and a hard place
Posts: 5,465
Default

wrong. there is a third kind of citizen. one who has his rights by just being an individual native bloke. until each and every native has signed off on the parchment, it only applies to the ones who have done so. i havent, including my service in the airforce. all i did at that time was to pledge to protect the constitution. i did that. it didnt ask me to do so for ever.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2008, 10:02 AM
canuck27's Avatar
AWE Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: canada
Posts: 10,536
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KokomoJoJo View Post
Which Citizen Are You?

Nov. 1989
by Richard McDonald

(PP) Date Line - America

What kind of citizen are you? Are you a 14th Amendment
federal citizen, or are you a Citizen of the several States, as
described in the Constitution as it was originally intended by
the Founding Fathers?
Are you aware that there exists in this
Nation two separate and distinct classes of citizenship?

To begin with, I must define what the definition that the
Original Constitution used when it referred to the "Citizens."

The phrase "Citizen of the United States" had a specific
meaning in the Original Constitution for the United States of
America (1787), the definition and intent of the Constitution was
that it described a "free born Citizen of the several States."
The 14th Amendment added a second (2nd) distinct meaning to this
phrase. So now, the phrase "Citizen of the United States" has
two separate and distinct meanings which are not compatible with
each other and indeed in a later issue will be shown to be at
odds with one another. They are:

1. A free born White State Citizen in the several States,
is an individual whose inalienable rights are recognized,
secured, and protected by the various State Constitutions against
State actions and against federal intrusion by the Constitution
for the United States of America(1787).

2. The 14th Amendment federal citizen, who is a second
class citizen, a juristic person, a citizen of foreign or
interstate commerce, one who has congressionally granted
privileges that are almost equal to the White Citizen.
I say
almost because these privileges are secured against a debt of
submission
to the morality legislated by Congress (including
Income Tax)
. These individuals are subjects of Congress (alieni
juris), under their protection as a "resident" of a State, a
person enfranchised to the Federal Government (the incorporated
United States defined in Article I, section 8, clause 17.)
The
individual States may not deny to these persons any federal
privileges or immunities that Congress has granted to them. This
specific class of citizens is a federal citizen under admiralty
(International Law).
As such they do not have unalienable common
rights recognized, secured and protected in the Constitutions of
the States, or of the United States of America (1787), such as
allodial rights to property, the right to inheritance, the
unalienable rights to work and contract, the right to travel,
life, liberty and happiness among many others.


Thus the federal citizen is a taxable entity such as any
other corporation, and is subject to pay an excise tax for the
privileges that Congress has granted them.


The White De Jure Citizen is a State Citizen by birth and
race (the Common Law) first, then as a consequence of his State
Citizenship, he is a "Citizen of the United States of America"
second. He owes his allegiance to his State of Domicile first,
and then to the Union of the several States.

The 14th Amendment citizen is a de facto citizen, a "citizen
of the United States" (corporate citizen of the District of
Columbia, its territories, and federal enclaves per Article I,
section 8, clause 17) first, as a consequence of this
citizenship, he is allowed to be a resident within the several
States. For this and other privileges he owes his allegiance to
the United States (corporation per Article I, section 8, clause
17) first, then to the State of his residence.


Note that "Domicile" and "residence" are not synonymous.
See Black's Law Dictionary, 5th Ed.

The Internal Revenue Code's definition of the term "citizen"
is identical to the wording of the 14th Amendment, and can only
apply to the subjects of Congress.
The Social Security Number
(SSN), a badge of slavery, is the main registration number of the de facto 14th Amendment citizen, so Congress can tax their subjects (slaves) wherever they are resident.


NOW, which citizen are YOU? a White State Citizen or a de facto resident?


You must decide -- this is a personal decision
-- and notify the appropriate government officials of your status
with respect to them. Be prepared though -- the United States
(District of Columbia) does not want their slaves to escape. If
they did, the profit of the Federal Reserve would dry up and you
might lead the Exodus out of Egypt.


////////////////////////////////////////////////////


Now that you are saying to yourselves that I am full of shit feast yer lil ole eyes on this!

Verified Statement Challenging Grand Jury Selection Policy:

In the fundamental law, the notion of a "citizen of the
United States" simply did not exist before the 14th Amendment;
at best, this notion is a fiction within a fiction. In
discussing the power of the States to naturalize, the California
State Supreme Court put it rather
bluntly when it ruled that there was no such thing as a "citizen of the United States":


A citizen of any one of the States of the union, is held to
be, and called a citizen of the United States, although
technically and abstractly there is no such thing. To
conceive a citizen of the United States who is not a citizen
of some one of the States, is totally foreign to the idea,
and inconsistent with the proper construction and common
understanding of the expression as used in the Constitution,
which must be deduced from its various other provisions.
The object then to be attained, by the exercise of the power
of naturalization, was to make citizens of the respective
States.
[Ex Parte Knowles, 5 Cal. 300 (1855)]

This decision has never been overturned!



So peeps of AWE sound off! Which "citizen" are you? (and are you happy with your citizenship or could things be a lot better? Does your government work for you or lead you? Do they listen to you or do you listen to them? I wonder if there are any Sovereigns on the board? I am betting not.

So is it time to take an interest in "Law"?

Whatcha all think about that? Is this all bull posted by a fanatic conspiracy theorist or are you paying those federal taxes because you love the irs so much?

.

What do you think of the dual citizenship ?
Most of the traitors of US were peoples of
dual citizenship .
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2008, 10:22 AM
countryslim's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,798
Default

Aww gee..I'm confused. I'm a fourth generation Texan, does that count?
__________________
"You are Republican, you would not understand what it is to support the platform of the Democratic party" = Cats Meow..
http://www.tellthechildrenthetruth.com/

Neo-Nazi Fools.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categor...ican_neo-Nazis

If it ain't broke, Don't Fix It!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2008, 10:23 AM
jebe's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: somewhere between a rock and a hard place
Posts: 5,465
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by countryslim View Post
Aww gee..I'm confused. I'm a fourth generation Texan, does that count?
if any one of your ancestors fought for an american war, then yes it does.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2008, 10:32 AM
canuck27's Avatar
AWE Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: canada
Posts: 10,536
Default

They (the Jews) work more effectively against us, than the enemy's armies. They are a hundred times more dangerous to our liberties and the great cause we are engaged in. It is much to be lamented that each state, long ago, has not hunted them down as pests to society and the greatest enemies we have to the happiness of America.
George Washington (1)
Source: in MAXIMS OF GEORGE WASHINGTON by AA. Appleton & Co.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2008, 10:55 AM
Oxymoron's Avatar
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brooklyn Fuggedaboutit
Posts: 197
Default

George Washingtons Address to the Hebrew Congregation in Newport, Rhode Island:

Quote:
It would be inconsistent with the frankness of my character not to avow that I am pleased with your favorable opinion of my Administration, and fervent wishes for my felicity. May the Children of the Stock of Abraham, who dwell in this land, continue to merit and enjoy the good will of the other Inhabitants; while every one shall sit in safety under his own vine and figtree, and there shall be none to make him afraid. May the father of all mercies scatter light and not darkness in our paths, and make us all in our several vocations useful here, and in his own due time and way everlastingly happy.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2008, 11:15 AM
KokomoJoJo's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,582
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jebe View Post
wrong. there is a third kind of citizen. one who has his rights by just being an individual native bloke. until each and every native has signed off on the parchment, it only applies to the ones who have done so. i havent, including my service in the airforce. all i did at that time was to pledge to protect the constitution. i did that. it didnt ask me to do so for ever.
They come under federal jurisdiction or are you talking about something else?

Quote:
Originally Posted by countryslim View Post
Aww gee..I'm confused. I'm a fourth generation Texan, does that count?
Look up the "barbara martin" case!

Last edited by KokomoJoJo; 09-05-2008 at 11:18 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2008, 11:18 AM
Lummy's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Don't know, don't recognize it any more.
Posts: 6,753
Default

Two points:

1 No one but no one enjoys getting other people to do their leg work and heavy lifting, if not their thinking, more than a liberal politician.

2 No one but no one enjoys owning slaves more than negroes.
__________________
Not Out of Africa:
http://www.arguewitheveryone.com/his...tml#post566549
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2008, 12:05 PM
canuck27's Avatar
AWE Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: canada
Posts: 10,536
Default

Jewish-Zionist-Soviet Anti-American Criminals & Spies



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Jonathan Pollard
Julius & Ethel Rosenberg
Mordechai Vanunu
Morton Sobell
Elizabeth Terrill Bentley
Klaus Fuchs
David Greenglass
Ruth Greenglass

Aleksandr Semyonovich Feklisov
Theodore Hall
William Perl
Harry Gold
Max Elitcher
Jewish/USA Mafia, Underworld, Gangs
The Mossad
Shin Bet
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
None

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


» Navigation

Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!


$5 monthly donation:

$10 monthly donation:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0