Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > Lobby

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2008, 05:06 PM
jebe's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: somewhere between a rock and a hard place
Posts: 5,469
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gummer View Post
And those "rules" would be?
dont forget. Yll made them. " everythings fair in love and war. "
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2008, 05:31 PM
Gummer's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The deep end of the gene pool
Posts: 2,734
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jebe View Post
dont forget. Yll made them. " everythings fair in love and war. "
T'was ever thus.......
__________________
CHECK THIS OUT ..... graybeard's "tribute" to Humble Lasher -----> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwFjt2x9Rws ...and another... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JECK3Ed1CN0

Political Correctness defined :
A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical liberal minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2008, 06:48 PM
Lummy's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Don't know, don't recognize it any more.
Posts: 6,753
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jebe View Post
hardly. the natives here were an experiment at extermination. only the gypsies, joos, and ukraines were treated even remotely like us.
An estimated 40 million Native Americans-First Peoples were exterminated. Negroes have become the symbols of convenience to represent all things guilt driven because they are still and always will be niggers.

This isn't a good time for this discussion. And it's off topic.
__________________
Not Out of Africa:
http://www.arguewitheveryone.com/his...tml#post566549
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2008, 08:21 PM
jebe's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: somewhere between a rock and a hard place
Posts: 5,469
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lummy View Post
An estimated 40 million Native Americans-First Peoples were exterminated. Negroes have become the symbols of convenience to represent all things guilt driven because they are still and always will be niggers.

This isn't a good time for this discussion. And it's off topic.
with the populatiuon, { and its proven, ive seen it in script }, of hispanola at one million when columbus first set foot there, that puts 100 million dead from small pox alone.
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 09-06-2008, 12:00 PM
Lummy's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Don't know, don't recognize it any more.
Posts: 6,753
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jebe View Post
with the populatiuon, { and its proven, ive seen it in script }, of hispanola at one million when columbus first set foot there, that puts 100 million dead from small pox alone.
I heard 200 million, but after 50, who's counting?
__________________
Not Out of Africa:
http://www.arguewitheveryone.com/his...tml#post566549
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 09-08-2008, 09:13 AM
KokomoJoJo's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,586
Default

The US Supreme Court in Hague v. CIO, 307 US 496, 520:

"... the first eight amendments have uniformly been held NOT be protected from state action by the privileges and immunities clause" [of the fourteenth amendment]

That's right! the US Supreme Court says that fourteenth amendment citizens are NOT protected by the Bill of Rights.


U.S. v. Rhodes, 27 Federal Cases 785, 794:

"The amendment [fourteenth] reversed and annulled the original policy of the constitution"


The US Supreme Court in Twining v. New Jersey, 211 US 78 (1908):

“The first eight Amendments are restrictive only of National action, and, while the Fourteenth Amendment restrained and limited state action, it did not take up and protect citizens of the States from action by the States as to all matters enumerated in the first eight Amendments.”


14 CJS section 4 quotes State v. Manuel, 20 NC 122:

"... the term `citizen' in the United States, is analogous to the term `subject' in the common law; the change of phrase has resulted from the change in government."

(Read that again. Pay attention. CITIZENS IN THE US ARE SUBJECTS EVER SINCE THE CHANGE IN GOVERNMENT. What part don't you understand?)



The 1936 conference of Governors made a promise to pay the interest on the national debt from the future earnings of its federal citizens. This is as valid as any other promise to pay, as is a promissory note. As with any mortgage or loan it can be sold or even foreclosed. When it is sold, the collateral is transferred with it.

When a birth certificate is filed with a state, the federal government creates a “strawman corporation” with the same name as the baby, except the name is all capitalized. This corporation is the all capitalized name that you see on “your” ID, which is not you and is not even a proper noun. It is the corporation that gets a social security number. This would be consistent with the Constitution that prohibits people from getting welfare. Only the corporation can get a bank loan or earn interest. This would explain how the government gets around the usury laws. Only the corporation can get a driver’s license or passport, or declare bankruptcy or pay probate or fill prescriptions. Only the corporation can pay taxes (which otherwise would be unconstitutional as an unapportioned direct tax). The state marries and divorces the corporations, while the flesh remain husband and wife until death do they part (as in Romans 7:2,3) because the government cannot put asunder any family relationship. Attorneys must represent corporations.

After the corporate child is created, the federal government then opens a Treasury Account into which it makes an account entry of the estimated value of all future earnings. It then uses the Governors’ promise to pay this account as collateral for another loan on the national debt. This corporation remains unconnected to you until you volunteer to pay its debts. To become surety to pay it’s debts, all you have to do is voluntarily sign a W-4 form or a 1040 form or pay a license fee. This becomes a solutio indebiti. You won’t believe that such a thing exists, but according to the law dictionary: “From the payment of which is not due arises an obligation ... and includes also the case where one performed labor for another, or assumed to pay a debt for which he was not bound, or relinquished a right or released a debt, under the impression that he was legally bound to do so.”

Lamentations 5:8 (KJV) "Servants have ruled over us: there is none that doth deliver us out of their hand."



George Carlin - "the American Dream"



Have a wonderful day

.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 09-12-2008, 10:35 PM
KokomoJoJo's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,586
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KokomoJoJo View Post
The US Supreme Court in Hague v. CIO, 307 US 496, 520:

"... the first eight amendments have uniformly been held NOT be protected from state action by the privileges and immunities clause" [of the fourteenth amendment]

That's right! the US Supreme Court says that fourteenth amendment citizens are NOT protected by the Bill of Rights.


U.S. v. Rhodes, 27 Federal Cases 785, 794:

"The amendment [fourteenth] reversed and annulled the original policy of the constitution"


The US Supreme Court in Twining v. New Jersey, 211 US 78 (1908):

“The first eight Amendments are restrictive only of National action, and, while the Fourteenth Amendment restrained and limited state action, it did not take up and protect citizens of the States from action by the States as to all matters enumerated in the first eight Amendments.”


14 CJS section 4 quotes State v. Manuel, 20 NC 122:

"... the term `citizen' in the United States, is analogous to the term `subject' in the common law; the change of phrase has resulted from the change in government."

(Read that again. Pay attention. CITIZENS IN THE US ARE SUBJECTS EVER SINCE THE CHANGE IN GOVERNMENT. What part don't you understand?)



The 1936 conference of Governors made a promise to pay the interest on the national debt from the future earnings of its federal citizens. This is as valid as any other promise to pay, as is a promissory note. As with any mortgage or loan it can be sold or even foreclosed. When it is sold, the collateral is transferred with it.

When a birth certificate is filed with a state, the federal government creates a “strawman corporation” with the same name as the baby, except the name is all capitalized. This corporation is the all capitalized name that you see on “your” ID, which is not you and is not even a proper noun. It is the corporation that gets a social security number. This would be consistent with the Constitution that prohibits people from getting welfare. Only the corporation can get a bank loan or earn interest. This would explain how the government gets around the usury laws. Only the corporation can get a driver’s license or passport, or declare bankruptcy or pay probate or fill prescriptions. Only the corporation can pay taxes (which otherwise would be unconstitutional as an unapportioned direct tax). The state marries and divorces the corporations, while the flesh remain husband and wife until death do they part (as in Romans 7:2,3) because the government cannot put asunder any family relationship. Attorneys must represent corporations.

After the corporate child is created, the federal government then opens a Treasury Account into which it makes an account entry of the estimated value of all future earnings. It then uses the Governors’ promise to pay this account as collateral for another loan on the national debt. This corporation remains unconnected to you until you volunteer to pay its debts. To become surety to pay it’s debts, all you have to do is voluntarily sign a W-4 form or a 1040 form or pay a license fee. This becomes a solutio indebiti. You won’t believe that such a thing exists, but according to the law dictionary: “From the payment of which is not due arises an obligation ... and includes also the case where one performed labor for another, or assumed to pay a debt for which he was not bound, or relinquished a right or released a debt, under the impression that he was legally bound to do so.”

Lamentations 5:8 (KJV) "Servants have ruled over us: there is none that doth deliver us out of their hand."



George Carlin - "the American Dream"



Have a wonderful day

.



What the hell? Not even one george carlin fan in the house?
__________________

US Supreme Court:

U.S. v. Rhodes, 27 Fed Cases 785, 794:
"The amendment [14th] reversed and annulled the original policy
of the constitution"

State v. Manuel, 20 NC 122:
"the term `citizen' in the United States, is analogous to the term
`subject' in common law
; the change of phrase has resulted
from the change in government."

That Means: US CITIZENS = "FEUDAL SUBJECTS",
& the Bill of Rights DO NOT apply to YOU!


Hail to the Queen!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
None

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


» Navigation

Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!


$5 monthly donation:

$10 monthly donation:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0