 |
|

05-12-2008, 08:19 PM
|
|
Political Junkie
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 206
|
|
Two home wrecking whores- Oprah and Walters
Just saw a clip of the Barbara Walters/Oprah Winfrey interview. Where Oprah asks Walters about her time as 'the mistress' of a married Senator. Well, Walters immediately repudiated the label of 'mistress', because as she puts it: she was financially independant and was a successful businesswoman at the time. She didn't NEED ANYONE. Later, Oprah too admitted to having an affair with a married man and also bristled at the label in an equally self righteous tone, explaining: 'I have NEVER been anyone's MISTRESS'. Her reasoning was similar to Walter's, she was too successful to be a mistress. -- If this isn't the height of liberal hypocrisy. Two home-wrecking whores who (with the help of disgustingly unfaithful husbands) conspired to ridicule a couple of poor unsuspecting wives. And now these two legandary women, hide behind the banner of 'feminism' and 'successful business women' to avoid any culpability in one of the most shameful acts of a WEAK WOMAN. If you can't find your own man/woman and are willing to destroy a family to satisfy your own pathetic sexual longings, yes you are a very weak person. Again, I blame the husbands MORE than the mistresses. But they were not giving the interview. Instead, you have a millionaire mistress and a billionaire mistress who routinely tell US how to live our lives, yet are unable to apologize and take credit for their wrong doings. Instead, they think: 'Well 'mistresses' are weak women who have no options becuase they are probably poor. We're rich and successful, how can we possibly be that'. Disgusting. And it is not very surprising that these two 'feminists' are unmarried and will probably die that way. And in Oprah's case, she will remain child less, too. You know how those da mn 'kids' always keep a good feminist down.
|

05-12-2008, 08:27 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 6,520
|
|
Consenting adults. Mean anything?
You blame the husbands more? They are the ones breaking vows.
Die unmarried? Yeah, that will really bother them.
And childless? Who cares?
'Home wrecking whores'? What century do you live in?
|

05-12-2008, 08:28 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 10,564
|
|
What a fucking moron....
Shove this national Enquirer bullshit on the FoxNews crowd, Dumbshit.
Or, try Hannity.com.
Timmy will be thrilled.
Wanker.
|

05-12-2008, 08:29 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 6,520
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by A. Crowley
What a fucking moron....
Shove this national Enquirer bullshit on the FoxNews crowd, Dumbshit.
Or, try Hannity.com.
Timmy will be thrilled.
Wanker.
|
Don't tell Timmy! He is married with 6 kids and a new truck.
|

05-12-2008, 08:57 PM
|
|
Political Junkie
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 206
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sachem
Consenting adults. Mean anything?
You blame the husbands more? They are the ones breaking vows.
Die unmarried? Yeah, that will really bother them.
And childless? Who cares?
'Home wrecking whores'? What century do you live in?
|
Yes, dying alone with no family usually saddens most feeling people. Are you a single bitter liberal, too?
Why did you say "Die unmarried? Yeah, that will really bother them"? Why won't it bother them? Because they are rich? Money isn't everything, you class warfare liberal. Family is. You know that "traditional institution" you liberals are always trying to take power away from (ie. underage abortions with no parental consent).
Face it. You don't see anything wrong with cheating on someone's husband or wife, because you will probably do it someday. Says a lot about your options.
|

05-12-2008, 09:01 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 10,564
|
|
Stupid fucking Bushbots make me wanna puke.
|

05-12-2008, 09:01 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 6,520
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FUNtoseeLIBSselfdestruct
Yes, dying alone with no family usually saddens most feeling people. Are you a single bitter liberal, too?
Why did you say "Die unmarried? Yeah, that will really bother them"? Why won't it bother them? Because they are rich? Money isn't everything, you class warfare liberal. Family is. You know that "traditional institution" you liberals are always trying to take power away from (ie. underage abortions with no parental consent).
Face it. You don't see anything wrong with cheating on someone's husband or wife, because you will probably do it someday. Says a lot about your options.
|
Not single or bitter. Liberal? You bet. You don't have to be married to have a family. They didn't cheat on anyone, the men did.
|

05-12-2008, 09:31 PM
|
|
Political Junkie
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 206
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sachem
Not single or bitter. Liberal? You bet. You don't have to be married to have a family. They didn't cheat on anyone, the men did.
|
I already said "I BLAMED THE MEN MORE". It's their marriage, they should've been more thoughtful. Yet, you are willing to give Barbara and Oprah a free pass? Do you think they did nothing wrong? They're not complicit in any wrong doing, in your opinion? Why do you find a need to defend them? On this, of all things? Is it because THEY ARE FELLOW WOMEN? DID YOU FEEL ATTACKED TOO, AS A GOOD FEMINIST?
Wait until you are married. It is a despicable thing to come between a family becuase you can't find your own man or woman. Don't you agree? OR ARE YOU UNABLE TO JUDGE INMORALITY, LIKE A GOOD LIBERAL? Nothing is "wrong" in a liberal's eyes, right? Unless, you're conservative, and then you're the devil. Silliness.
|

05-12-2008, 09:37 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: everywhere
Posts: 14,197
|
|
Who watches Oprah or Walters anymore?
Anyway, a woman I know has been carrying on a marital affair for over 20 years and calls her married lover her "significant over". What a load of crap.
Oprah and Walters may have not been "kept" women, but they were definitely mistresses.
Main Entry: mis·tress
Pronunciation: \ˈmis-trəs\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English maistresse, from Anglo-French mestresse, feminine of mestre master — more at master
Date: 14th century
1: a woman who has power, authority, or ownership: as a: the female head of a household b: a woman who employs or supervises servants c: a woman who is in charge of a school or other establishment d: a woman of the Scottish nobility having a status comparable to that of a master
2 achiefly British : a female teacher or tutor b: a woman who has achieved mastery in some field
3: something personified as female that rules, directs, or dominates <when Rome was mistress of the world>
4 a: a woman other than his wife with whom a married man has a continuing sexual relationship barchaic : sweetheart5 a—used archaically as a title prefixed to the name of a married or unmarried woman bchiefly Southern & Midland : mrs. 1a
|

05-12-2008, 09:40 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 6,520
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FUNtoseeLIBSselfdestruct
I already said "I BLAMED THE MEN MORE". It's their marriage, they should've been more thoughtful. Yet, you are willing to give Barbara and Oprah a free pass? Do you think they did nothing wrong? They're not complicit in any wrong doing, in your opinion? Why do you find a need to defend them? On this, of all things? Is it because THEY ARE FELLOW WOMEN? DID YOU FEEL ATTACKED TOO, AS A GOOD FEMINIST?
Wait until you are married. It is a despicable thing to come between a family becuase you can't find your own man or woman. Don't you agree? OR ARE YOU UNABLE TO JUDGE INMORALITY, LIKE A GOOD LIBERAL? Nothing is "wrong" in a liberal's eyes, right? Unless, you're conservative, and then you're the devil. Silliness.
|
A free pass? No. I think you set yourself up for a lot of grief dating a marrird man. And as a woman, I would find it hard to do that to another woman, but love/sex can make you do crazy things. But, they are adults and they are not the ones cheating. I defended them because you called them home wrecking whores and they are neither. I don't feel attacked. I am married. Again, what year is this? Find your "own" man or woman. Please. How were they immoral? THEY WEREN'T MARRIED. I don't find conservatives to be the devil. Just misguided. 
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|