Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > Lobby
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 08:19 PM
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 206
Default Two home wrecking whores- Oprah and Walters

Just saw a clip of the Barbara Walters/Oprah Winfrey interview. Where Oprah asks Walters about her time as 'the mistress' of a married Senator. Well, Walters immediately repudiated the label of 'mistress', because as she puts it: she was financially independant and was a successful businesswoman at the time. She didn't NEED ANYONE. Later, Oprah too admitted to having an affair with a married man and also bristled at the label in an equally self righteous tone, explaining: 'I have NEVER been anyone's MISTRESS'. Her reasoning was similar to Walter's, she was too successful to be a mistress. -- If this isn't the height of liberal hypocrisy. Two home-wrecking whores who (with the help of disgustingly unfaithful husbands) conspired to ridicule a couple of poor unsuspecting wives. And now these two legandary women, hide behind the banner of 'feminism' and 'successful business women' to avoid any culpability in one of the most shameful acts of a WEAK WOMAN. If you can't find your own man/woman and are willing to destroy a family to satisfy your own pathetic sexual longings, yes you are a very weak person. Again, I blame the husbands MORE than the mistresses. But they were not giving the interview. Instead, you have a millionaire mistress and a billionaire mistress who routinely tell US how to live our lives, yet are unable to apologize and take credit for their wrong doings. Instead, they think: 'Well 'mistresses' are weak women who have no options becuase they are probably poor. We're rich and successful, how can we possibly be that'. Disgusting. And it is not very surprising that these two 'feminists' are unmarried and will probably die that way. And in Oprah's case, she will remain child less, too. You know how those da mn 'kids' always keep a good feminist down.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 08:27 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 6,520
Default

Consenting adults. Mean anything?
You blame the husbands more? They are the ones breaking vows.
Die unmarried? Yeah, that will really bother them.
And childless? Who cares?
'Home wrecking whores'? What century do you live in?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 08:28 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 10,564
Default

What a fucking moron....


Shove this national Enquirer bullshit on the FoxNews crowd, Dumbshit.


Or, try Hannity.com.


Timmy will be thrilled.




Wanker.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 08:29 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 6,520
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by A. Crowley View Post
What a fucking moron....


Shove this national Enquirer bullshit on the FoxNews crowd, Dumbshit.


Or, try Hannity.com.


Timmy will be thrilled.




Wanker.
Don't tell Timmy! He is married with 6 kids and a new truck.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 08:57 PM
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 206
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sachem View Post
Consenting adults. Mean anything?
You blame the husbands more? They are the ones breaking vows.
Die unmarried? Yeah, that will really bother them.
And childless? Who cares?
'Home wrecking whores'? What century do you live in?
Yes, dying alone with no family usually saddens most feeling people. Are you a single bitter liberal, too?

Why did you say "Die unmarried? Yeah, that will really bother them"? Why won't it bother them? Because they are rich? Money isn't everything, you class warfare liberal. Family is. You know that "traditional institution" you liberals are always trying to take power away from (ie. underage abortions with no parental consent).

Face it. You don't see anything wrong with cheating on someone's husband or wife, because you will probably do it someday. Says a lot about your options.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 09:01 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 10,564
Default

Stupid fucking Bushbots make me wanna puke.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 09:01 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 6,520
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FUNtoseeLIBSselfdestruct View Post
Yes, dying alone with no family usually saddens most feeling people. Are you a single bitter liberal, too?

Why did you say "Die unmarried? Yeah, that will really bother them"? Why won't it bother them? Because they are rich? Money isn't everything, you class warfare liberal. Family is. You know that "traditional institution" you liberals are always trying to take power away from (ie. underage abortions with no parental consent).

Face it. You don't see anything wrong with cheating on someone's husband or wife, because you will probably do it someday. Says a lot about your options.
Not single or bitter. Liberal? You bet. You don't have to be married to have a family. They didn't cheat on anyone, the men did.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 09:31 PM
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 206
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sachem View Post
Not single or bitter. Liberal? You bet. You don't have to be married to have a family. They didn't cheat on anyone, the men did.
I already said "I BLAMED THE MEN MORE". It's their marriage, they should've been more thoughtful. Yet, you are willing to give Barbara and Oprah a free pass? Do you think they did nothing wrong? They're not complicit in any wrong doing, in your opinion? Why do you find a need to defend them? On this, of all things? Is it because THEY ARE FELLOW WOMEN? DID YOU FEEL ATTACKED TOO, AS A GOOD FEMINIST?

Wait until you are married. It is a despicable thing to come between a family becuase you can't find your own man or woman. Don't you agree? OR ARE YOU UNABLE TO JUDGE INMORALITY, LIKE A GOOD LIBERAL? Nothing is "wrong" in a liberal's eyes, right? Unless, you're conservative, and then you're the devil. Silliness.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 09:37 PM
oceanbreeze's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: everywhere
Posts: 14,197
Default

Who watches Oprah or Walters anymore?
Anyway, a woman I know has been carrying on a marital affair for over 20 years and calls her married lover her "significant over". What a load of crap.
Oprah and Walters may have not been "kept" women, but they were definitely mistresses.



Main Entry: mis·tress
Pronunciation: \ˈmis-trəs\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English maistresse, from Anglo-French mestresse, feminine of mestre master — more at master
Date: 14th century
1: a woman who has power, authority, or ownership: as a: the female head of a household b: a woman who employs or supervises servants c: a woman who is in charge of a school or other establishment d: a woman of the Scottish nobility having a status comparable to that of a master
2 achiefly British : a female teacher or tutor b: a woman who has achieved mastery in some field
3: something personified as female that rules, directs, or dominates <when Rome was mistress of the world>
4 a: a woman other than his wife with whom a married man has a continuing sexual relationship barchaic : sweetheart5 a—used archaically as a title prefixed to the name of a married or unmarried woman bchiefly Southern & Midland : mrs. 1a
__________________
honor the fallen; http://www.militarycity.com/valor/honor.html
Iraq body count http://www.iraqbodycount.org/
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 09:40 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 6,520
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FUNtoseeLIBSselfdestruct View Post
I already said "I BLAMED THE MEN MORE". It's their marriage, they should've been more thoughtful. Yet, you are willing to give Barbara and Oprah a free pass? Do you think they did nothing wrong? They're not complicit in any wrong doing, in your opinion? Why do you find a need to defend them? On this, of all things? Is it because THEY ARE FELLOW WOMEN? DID YOU FEEL ATTACKED TOO, AS A GOOD FEMINIST?

Wait until you are married. It is a despicable thing to come between a family becuase you can't find your own man or woman. Don't you agree? OR ARE YOU UNABLE TO JUDGE INMORALITY, LIKE A GOOD LIBERAL? Nothing is "wrong" in a liberal's eyes, right? Unless, you're conservative, and then you're the devil. Silliness.
A free pass? No. I think you set yourself up for a lot of grief dating a marrird man. And as a woman, I would find it hard to do that to another woman, but love/sex can make you do crazy things. But, they are adults and they are not the ones cheating. I defended them because you called them home wrecking whores and they are neither. I don't feel attacked. I am married. Again, what year is this? Find your "own" man or woman. Please. How were they immoral? THEY WEREN'T MARRIED. I don't find conservatives to be the devil. Just misguided.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



» Navigation
Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Poltical Topsites PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings