Two home wrecking whores- Oprah and Walters

oceanbreeze · #**221** (**permalink**) 05-14-2008, 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by toxic

Well, your husband must regret marrying you

Except the one I'm married to.

BD; that's some pretty messed thinking ya got going on.

bluedog · #**222** (**permalink**) 05-14-2008, 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oceanbreeze

Except the one I'm married to.

BD; that's some pretty messed thinking ya got going on.

The truth is simply the truth. I try to stream my thoughts in a straight line from one polar extreme to the other, where there are absolute truths, lies, evils, and examples of good resting, without circling in between the poles where all the areas of gray obstruct logical conclusions, better known as circular reasoning, with no foundation to any logical thought with roots planted on either end. BD

oceanbreeze · #**223** (**permalink**) 05-14-2008, 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bluedog

The truth is simply the truth. I try to stream my thoughts in a straight line from one polar extreme to the other, where there are absolute truths, lies, evils, and examples of good resting, without circling in between the poles where all the areas of gray obstruct logical conclusions, better known as circular reasoning, with no foundation to any logical thought with roots planted on either end. BD

Hogwash.
You think women should be obedient and not vote.

ricechickie · #**224** (**permalink**) 05-14-2008, 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bluedog

Certainly she is a Christian and follows the will of God, not secular humanism. We are equal in all our daily endeavors, but she knows that her Christian role is one of support to our entire family. You act as if I somehow disrespect all women, this could not be further from the truth. I am commanded to care and protect my wife, and my entire family. You confuse the role of leadership with some false ideology of bigotry toward women. God does not declare women as inferior to man in any fashion, they are just not to go against the natural hierarchy that God presents in all nature. Women are just to nurturing and emotional to have any valid traits for leadership. There are exceptions, as history has presented many strong women that have assumed command when the male leadership capacity was limited due to ignorance or cowardliness. But these are the exceptions and it has taken exceptional women to fill those roles.

Women should hold no authority over men in any area of life. Advise, love, comfort, sharing, all are demonstrated as values in any woman. But on the other hand militant feminism is nothing short of a declaration of war on God and all men. Thus, you have the accusations inverted. Women fired the first volley when they assumed the role of self professed leaders of men, an unrighteous endeavor that is unnatural.

Fathers for Life

How far do you take the idea that "women should hold no authority or men"? You wouldn't take having a female boss? You didn't listen to your mother? Female teachers?

As far as feminists wanting to be leaders of men, I think feminists didn't want women to be excluded from leadership positions when qualified to be in them. And I think you're confusing nature with tradition.

George O Well · #**225** (**permalink**) 05-14-2008, 06:43 PM

Quote:

They just don't like to talk about it.

Oh, they like to talk about it. Even if they haven't gotten any in years. Mostly down at T.J.I. Friday's. To proclaim to their buddies that they aren't totally gay.

webeatu00and04 · #**226** (**permalink**) 05-17-2008, 09:01 PM

This has nothing to do with feminism or strong women. Oprah and Walters were simple low down, degraded, home wreking, whores. The title of mistress that they do not want to be labeled with, is exactly what they are. The definition of a mistress is a woman having an affair with a married man. There is nothing heroic, revolutionary or feminist about it. If they are women enough to talk about it in national TV and hurt other women and their ex lover's families, than we should be able to call them for what they are. They were both second choices for men that were using them and took advantage of them sexually and psychologically.