 |
|

12-05-2007, 05:33 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,493
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom 1
You just better stop beating me up and making me look stupid all the time, or , or, or I'll send privete messages to people and make them come and help me !
Then I'll send you a nasty PM !
Then, Then.,..I get in drag and become Monkey in the middle, and and..I'll call you a dunderhead, and then I'l call other guys "Dahling"
I will, you'll see !!
Big mean dunderhead you !
|
Oh look it's Doms Groupie
Medorka
__________________
The crows seemed to be calling his name, thought Caw.
- Jack Handy
|

12-05-2007, 05:58 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: mountains of East TN
Posts: 11,177
|
|
Come on, come on, stay on track, What is a Neocon? Who disagrees with the Wikipedia version? Why do you disagree?
__________________
Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Sarah
|

12-05-2007, 06:05 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,355
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nathanbforrest45
Read and learn
In the United States, the "New Left" was the name loosely associated with liberal, sometimes radical, political movements that took place during the 1960s, primarily among college students. The origin of the name can be traced to an open letter written in 1960 by sociologist C. Wright Mills entitled Letter to the New Left. Mills argued for a new leftist ideology, moving away from the traditional ("Old Left") focus on labor issues, towards more personalized issues such as opposing alienation, anomie, authoritarianism, and other ills of the modern affluent society. Put differently, Mills argued for a shift from traditional leftism, toward the values of the Counterculture.
The New Left opposed the prevailing authority structures in society, which it termed "The Establishment," and those who rejected this authority became known as "anti-Establishment." The New Left did not seek to recruit industrial workers, but rather concentrated on a social activist approach to organization. Many in the New Left were convinced that they could be the source for a better kind of social revolution.
Most New Left thinkers in the U.S., to varying degrees, were influenced by the Vietnam war and the Chinese Cultural Revolution. Like the British New Left, they also believed that the Secret Speech drew attention to problems with the Soviet Union, but unlike the British New Left, they did not turn to Trotskyism or social democracy as a result. Much of the U.S. New Left argued that since the Soviet Union could no longer be considered the world center for proletarian revolution, new revolutionary Communist thinkers had to be substituted in its place — Mao Zedong, Ho Chi Minh and Fidel Castro were identified as key contributors to this new framework.
Other elements of the U.S. New Left were anarchist and looked to libertarian socialist traditions of American radicalism, and investigated the Industrial Workers of the World and previous union militancy. This group coalesced around the historical journal Radical America and in grouplets. American Autonomist Marxism was also a child of this stream the U.S. New Left, for instance in the thought of Harry Cleaver.
The U.S. New Left both influenced and drew inspiration from black radicalism, particularly the Black Power movement and the more explicitly left-wing Black Panther Party. The Panthers in turn influenced other similar militant groups, like the Young Lords, the Brown Berets and the American Indian Movement.
The organization that really came to symbolize the core of the New Left was the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). In 1962 Tom Hayden wrote its founding document, the Port Huron Statement, which issued a call for "participatory democracy" based on nonviolent civil disobedience. The SDS marshaled anti-war, pro-civil rights and free speech concerns on campuses, and managed to bring together liberals and more revolutionary leftists. The SDS became the leading organization of the antiwar movement on college campuses during the Vietnam War, and during the course of the war became increasingly militant. As opposition to the war grew stronger, the SDS became a nationally prominent political organization, but opposing the war became an overriding concern that overshadowed many of the original issues that had inspired SDS.
In 1968 and 1969, as its radicalism reached a fever pitch, the SDS began to split under the strain of internal dissension and increasing turns toward Maoism. In this vein, along with adherents known as the New Communist Movement, some extremist terrorist splinter factions also emerged, such as the Weather Underground Organization.
|
Well most of you retard righties are actually "new left" since you are nearly all against the establishment.
__________________
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
— Benjamin Franklin
The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.
John Adams from the " Treaty of Tripoly, article 11
|

12-05-2007, 06:07 PM
|
 |
Duck Pond Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 23,937
|
|
Just as Aldous Huxley began the counterculture subversion of the United States thirty years before its consequences became evident to the public, Lord Bertrand Russell began laying the foundations for the anti-war movement of the 1960s before the 1930s expired. Russell's "pacifism" was always relative -- the means to his most cherished end, one-world government on the imperial model, that would curb the nation-state and its persistent tendency toward republicanism and technological progress.
Lord Russell and Aldous Huxley cofounded the Peace Pledge Union in 1937 campaigning for peace with Hitler-just before both went to the United States for the duration of World War.20 During World War II, Lord Russell opposed British and American warfare against the Nazis. 1111947, when the United States was in possession of the atomic bomb and Russia was not, Russell loudly advocated that the United States order the Soviets to surrender to a one-world government that would enjoy a restrictive monopoly on nuclear weapons, under the threat of a preemptive World War III against the Soviet Union. His 1950s "Ban the Bomb" movement was directed to the same end-it functioned as an anti-technology movement against the peace-through-economic development potentials represented by President Eisenhower's "Atoms for Peace"' initiative.
From the mid-1950s onward, Russell's principal assignment was to build an international anti-war and anti-American movement. Coincident with the escalation of U.S. involvement in Vietnam under British manipulation, Russell upgraded the old Peace Pledge Union (which had been used in West Germany throughout the postwar period to promote an anti-capitalist "New left" wing of the Social Democratic Party, recruiting several future members of the Baader-Meinhof terrorist gang in the process) into the Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation.
In the United States, the New York banks provided several hundred thousand dollars to establish the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), effectively the U.S. branch of the Russell Peace Foundation. Among the founding trustees of the IPS was James Warburg, directly representing the family's interests.
IPS drew its most active operatives from a variety of British-dominated institutions. IPS founding director Marcus Raskin was a member of the Kennedy administration's National Security Council and also a fellow of the National Training Labs, a U.S. subsidiary of the Tavistock Institute founded by Dr. Kurt Lewin.
After its creation by the League for Industrial Democracy, Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), the umbrella of the student anti-war movement, was in turn financed and run through IPS -- up through and beyond its splintering into a number of terrorist and Maoist gangs in the late 1960s.21 More broadly, the institutions and outlook of the U.S. anti-war movement were dominated by the direct political descendants of the British-dominated "socialist movement" in the U.S.A., fostered by the House of Morgan as far back as the years before World War!.
|

12-05-2007, 06:28 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 12,601
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nathanbforrest45
Come on, come on, stay on track, What is a Neocon? Who disagrees with the Wikipedia version? Why do you disagree?
|
There probably is not telling what a neocon is. Until 25 years ago, they were Gene McCarthy supporters and spouted all sorts of left wing shit. Before that, their leaders had portraits of Leon Trotsky hanging on their walls at the Univ. of Chicago. Reagan liked to talk tough about the Middle East and Gene McCarthy did not, so they became Reaganites. FOTM is, they don't give a shit about liberal/conservative, right/left, up/down. All they want is for the U.S. military to bomb shit out Israel's enemies.
|

12-05-2007, 07:59 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,777
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nathanasswipeforest
Define Neocon
|
I can define toothless, hillbilly, KKK lover:
YOU.
__________________
GOD BLESS AMERICA
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|