Originally Posted by I_Hate_the_Nazi_Right

Yes... I'm proud to be as educated as I am (do you a jpeg of my dipolmas?) At this point I would probably go that fucking far...

Originally Posted by I_Hate_the_Nazi_Right

Well Dommy like to point out when others make spelling or grammer mistakes so I went back through his posts and randomly picked a couple and here they are with their issue in bold...

Vice President Cheney changed his residence from Texas to Wyoming a couple of months before the 2000 election. According to the 12th Amendment, if he had not then I assume Joseph Lieberman would have been Bush's Vice President. I am not sure why this is even in the 12th Amendment or what purpose it really serves. A suit was filed about Cheney's change of residence but is was ultimately dismissed.


If the ACLU was just defending NAMBLA's right to lobby Congress or other lawmakers to make sex with young boys legal you defenders would have valid points. But they are not just doing that. They are also defending NAMBLA's right to publish the pamphlet known as the Rape and Escape Manual. That is NOT free speech. There is nothing in the First Amendment that gives people the right to publish a handbook on how to rape boys and then how to escape the country if law enforcement officials are on to you.

The defenders say "but NAMBLA has the right to want this to be legal and it is free speech." But the ACLU is taking on the whole package. Part of that package is telling members how to rape little boys. The defenders need to come up with a defense for this.

One of the killers alledgedly wrote in his diary (this according to the attorney who says he has the evidence) that he was reluctant to have sex with children until he joined NAMBLA. It isn't like this guy wanted to have sex with boys just because he joined NAMBLA, I am sure he was a pervert before. Just maybe what gave him the confidence to do this and the belief that he could get away with it was NAMBLA publications and tips on their website which told him how to lure the boy into sex, and how to get away if found out.

I brought up Hoover and showed you how FDR continued some of his policies. I even gave you specific legislation and policies and you skipped over them because you could form no response. You were wrong and you knew it. If you didn't know you were wrong then I suspect that you could have at least formulated a response.

Now in the second paragraph you are just making things up. I showed you a socialistic price control practice to artificially raise prices and you said that was NOT what he was doing. Now you are saying he did artificially raise the prices. So, once again, you were wrong and now admit it.

The topsided distrubution of wealth is one of many theories. It is much more complex than that. Again, according to you this would not have been present six years into FDR's term but the worst crash in history happened in 1938. Explain that one.

FDR adopted some of Hoover's policies and Tugwell, the guy who helped write the AAA, said that the New Deal was "extrapolated from earlier Hoover policies."

Originally Posted by Karen

yea i am not even around here that much and every time i am here those two sound like my litle sisters. its never even clear what they are talking about except they knock each other around over crap that dosent even count for anything. so what they both make a lot of spelling mistakes so do i cause i am typing on a beak room computer . thye both hate each other and pick and pick . they mut have loads of free time both of them

Originally Posted by Dom1

You don't take much pride in the way you write your posts, thats for sure. Take the above post for example. Also, you still haven't told us why you lied about where you went to school and what you majored in. Why haven't you explained those lies Nazi man?

Originally Posted by Karen

how would you know if someone on the internet lied unless you know them outside of thisplace?

Originally Posted by Karen

how would you know if someone on the internet lied unless you know them outside of thisplace?

Originally Posted by Dom1

Because he gave two different accounts at this place . . . pretty easy, huh?

For example, if you claim you graduated with two majors, and then you changed that account a few months later, I would call you a liar. Now, either he was lying the first time, the second time, or both times. But he was definately lying one of the times - and anyone should be able to figure that one out. There are other examples. He just makes shit up about himself and then later contradicts himself. Most likely because he is far too stupid to remember his own lies.

Originally Posted by I_Hate_the_Nazi_Right

I gave my academic advisor information to Dom to verify my past. He can't get past that...