Funny, you talking about research. You are the one who refused to read the relatively short Korherr Report. You aren't interested in anything that disputes your love affair with Nazis and hatred for Jews.

If you have the gumption to go back and re-read the thread, you may find that I asked you or someone to tell me exactly what part of that "document" I should comment on, and I don't recall getting an answer.

Sure, let's read from the Nuremberg Trials:

COL. AMEN: (reading from the confession of Rudolf Hoess, Commandant of Auschwitz) "I have been constantly associated with the administration of concentration camps since 1934, serving at Dachau until 1938; then as Adjutant in Sachsenhausen from 1938 to 1 May 1940, when I was appointed Commandant of Auschwitz.. I commanded Auschwitz until 1 December 1943, and estimate that at least 2,500,000 victims were executed and exterminated there by gassing and burning, and at least another half million succumbed to starvation and disease making a total dead of about 3,000,000. This figure represents about 70 or 80 percent of all persons sent to Auschwitz as prisoners, the remainder having been selected and used for slave labor in the concentration camp industries; included among the executed and burned were approximately 20,000 Russian prisoners of war (previously screened out of prisoner-of-war cages by the Gestapo) who were delivered at Auschwitz in Wehrmacht transports operated by regular Wehrmacht officers and men. The remainder of the total number of victims included about 100,000 German Jews, and great numbers of citizens, mostly Jewish, from Holland, France, Belgium, Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Greece, or other countries. We executed about 400,000 Hungarian Jews alone at Auschwitz in the summer of 1944."
That is all true, Witness?

HOESS: Yes, it is.

What evidence do you have that Höss was coerced into saying that? Also, how do you explain that his testimony matches up with others, including prisioners who survived Auschwitz? Are you claiming that prisoners at Auschwitz were also tortured at Nuremberg to coerce them into making claims corroborating Höss?

Maybe because it is over 600 posts long!

Why didn't you comment on it the first time? Why did you refuse to read it at all?

Maybe you could comment on the Nazi's assessment of how many Jews were in Europe, that could be the first thing. Once you take the Nazi's words then you can then come up with an explanation of where they all went.

After that, you can look at the minutes of the Wannsee Conference. Try explaining that one away as well.

[quote=Dom1;374193]Funny, you talking about research. You are the one who refused to read the relatively short Korherr Report.
============
As I recall, that "relatively short" report was some 6 or 7 pages long, wasn't it? Why should I have to read through the whole thing to find out what the point of it is? Why can't you or anyone else simply designate the part that is pertinent to this conversation? I will reply to any question that I think is reasonable, but to insert such a long, rambling item and expect me to go through it and select which part you feel to be germane is stupid.



You aren't interested in anything that disputes your love affair with Nazis and hatred for Jews
=============
I have no love affair with anyone except my woman. I do, however, have great admiration for people who will stand up to the International Zionist terrorists, and that includes the Germans. If you don't like it, that's tough for you, old sport. In addition, I do not hate Jews any more than I "hate" rattlesnakes or mad dogs; I simply know they are dangerous and like to warn people about them for their own safety.

Six or seven pages is relatively short, and someone who thinks they are equipped to discuss the holocaust should be able to read that. In fact, I would be willing to bet that you have read longer pieces which support your view.

It isn't a long rambling document. It is split up into sections and one reason it is as long as it is (and again, it isn't very long) is because of lists of population numbers.

Look, I said look at the population numbers and then answer a simple question, where did they all go? A lot of the arguments revolve around there weren't that many Jews in Europe to begin with, but the Nazis themselves disagree.

Idiot. Six or seven pages is NOT long. I told you I would help you with the big words.


It isn't 'tough' for me, I am sure it affects you more. Like if you ever had the balls to actually say this in person to people - then they would know that you are a bigot and an idiot.

I don't see how I said anything different than you are, you readily admit that you have admiration for a man who killed millions of Jews because they were Jews.

[quote=Dom1;374222]Maybe because it is over 600 posts long!

Why didn't you comment on it the first time? Why did you refuse to read it at all?
=======
It was too long to waste time on. I read excerpts and saw nothing incriminating the Germans in what I read, but if you want to point out a specific part of it that you want me to comment on, let's have it.


Maybe you could comment on the Nazi's assessment of how many Jews were in Europe, that could be the first thing.
=============
What was their assessment, and why do you question it? Don't think you are going to throw that whole paper at me and expect me to comment on every part of it. That would take up too much of my time that is dedicated to opposing you Jews and doing the work of the Lord. LOL. If you want my personal opinion on the number of Jews who were in Germany, it would be TOO MANY.


Once you take the Nazi's words then you can then come up with an explanation of where they all went.
=========
Why shouldn't I take their word for it? I certainly won't take the Zionists' word for anything. They are notorious for lying like an old carpet. It is part of their psyche to lie about anything that adversely affects Jewry; in fact the official motto of the Israeli terrorist unit, the Mossad, is "By way of deception, we shall do war," or words to that effect. Jews have been involved in so many "false flag" operations that the truth of that motto is manifest.


After that, you can look at the minutes of the Wannsee Conference. Try explaining that one away as well.
===============
Is the Wannsee Conference anything like the Bilderbergers or the Skull and Bones Society that secretly meets and plots each year's screwing of the people? Read something not produced by the Zionist press, old top.

Six or seven pages isn't too long, not for anyone with any brains.

I did point it out, look at the Nazi's estimations of Jewish popultion numbers. How many more times do I need to say the same thing before you get it?

I don't question their assessment. It is YOU and other dipshtis who question what the Nazi's said about teh population numbers.

Funny, you talk about doing the Lord's work and then say that your personal opinion on how many Jews were in Germany is too many.

Look you stupid fucker, I said look at the population estimates, what is so tough for you to understand?

This is different from Stormfront, huh? You just have a bunch of other mindless dolts aggreeing with you there. What do you guys do for fun over there, exchange meth recipes? I wouldn't really know because I have been booted from that forum a couple of times, mainly for calling you cowardly neo-nazis fucking cowards and idiots - which you are.

I think you should take their word for it. Thing is, you are not. They admit to the Holocaust. They admit to the Jewish population numbers. It is only recent nazis such as yourself who were not there and are massive idiots who deny what the Nazi's themselves say.

You do realize that by saying you are taking the nazi's word for it you are admitting that the Holocaust did indeed happen, don't you?

The Wannsee minutes come from Martin Luther, not the Jews.

Are you actually denying the conference took place? Again, I stand by what I said regarding your intelligence level.

Hey Lasher, do you think the Holocaust did indeed happen?

[quote=Dom1;374246]Six or seven pages isn't too long, not for anyone with any brains.
===========
Then you, yourself haven't read it?


I did point it out, look at the Nazi's estimations of Jewish popultion numbers. How many more times do I need to say the same thing before you get it?
=================
Pal, I am not even going back to that post. I told you I consider it a forgery by you Jews, so why should I? Either that, or the results of Jewish torture of German officials.



I don't question their assessment. It is YOU and other dipshtis who question what the Nazi's said about teh population numbers.
==========
I don't CARE what you say the Nazis said. Got that, old sport?



Funny, you talk about doing the Lord's work and then say that your personal opinion on how many Jews were in Germany is too many.
============
I will expand on that statement and say that even one Jew would have been too many.



Look you stupid fucker, I said look at the population estimates, what is so tough for you to understand?
===========
Easy, Bagelmuncher, don't get so stirred up that you burst a blood vessel!


This is different from Stormfront, huh? You just have a bunch of other mindless dolts aggreeing with you there. What do you guys do for fun over there, exchange meth recipes? I wouldn't really know because I have been booted from that forum a couple of times, mainly for calling you cowardly neo-nazis fucking cowards and idiots - which you are.
==========
OMG! Please calm down. Even though I wouldn't care if you were being eaten by worms, I'm still having lots of laughs reading your ridiculous rants, old sport, so don't pop that artery until I get through with you!



I think you should take their word for it. Thing is, you are not. They admit to the Holocaust. They admit to the Jewish population numbers. It is only recent nazis such as yourself who were not there and are massive idiots who deny what the Nazi's themselves say.
===========
Is that right?


You do realize that by saying you are taking the nazi's word for it you are admitting that the Holocaust did indeed happen, don't you?
=============
No.



The Wannsee minutes come from Martin Luther, not the Jews.
=========
Martin Luther King? Had to be, because the other one died a long time before Hitler was born.



Are you actually denying the conference took place? Again, I stand by what I said regarding your intelligence level.
==============
No, I'm not denying it, but why do you expect me to know every word that was said there? You can stand by Karl Marx as far as I care, but everyone here can see that I am your superior in everything. You are a sick puppy with a grudge against those who are outting your tribe of Chosenites.