Quote:
Originally Posted by rob
I was wondering if there were others that would be intrested and discussing this issue.
|
Rob..I went to the FAQ page on the link provided by Sam earlier. Just a quick read lead to some questions of my own. Maybe someone can answer them.
1. The claim that Doctors would basically have oversight on what tests others are performing. It says that a Doctor that is ordering more tests than others in his specialty would be policed by them due to the fact he is basically taking more money from the pool. Wouldn't this lead to a Doctor not ordering possibly needed test just so he wouldn't be seen as getting more?
2. There is a statement regarding malpractice insurance rates declining to make up for some lost revenue for the doctor. How and who is going to enforce lower malpractice insurance rates?
3. There is a statement regarding how money is now made by private firms that results from govt. financed research. Isn't this what so many people are clamoring for in the research of embryonic stem-cells? Just like many other areas, private firms will surely benefit from govt financed research.
4. One other thing, just kind of an aside, The statement is made that medical insurance or the lack thereof would no longer be a bargaining chip when talking of employment. I'm just curious how the big unions feel on single-payer since it would seem to take away another piece of their pie. They would seem to lose the advantage of claiming they can get a prospective union member excellent health-care.