Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > Organized Online Debates > Refereed Debate

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 09:54 AM
Gummer's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The deep end of the gene pool
Posts: 1,188
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wibblyesq View Post
Ah, excluding the poor and handicapped, a tactic worthy of the National Socialists..
Call it whatever pleases you..... it sounds like you wouldn't qualify ....tough shit
__________________
Definition of political correctness:
A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical liberal minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.

I'm politically incorrect and damn well satisfied to be so. Gummer
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 10:05 AM
wibblyesq's Avatar
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 281
Default

Aw, is the little proto-nazi butthurt?
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 10:10 AM
nathanbforrest45's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: mountains of East TN
Posts: 8,985
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by areyoushittin'me? View Post
I suppose if the governments only job were to mismanage your donation to its monetary coffers the fair tax argument might have some validity...but isn't our government spose to be about other shit too...it should especially protect to the best of its abilities that basic shit, you know, like life liberty and the pursuit of happiness...heard about that somewhere...

So, you figurin' the military should oversee all government stuff and things?

There's a bunch of other ways to serve, I'm figurin'

As usual shitforbrains you have managed to entirely miss the meaning of a post. I did not say the only purpose of the government was the military, although that is the main purpose of a government in my opinion. I said that if you were not willing to defend the country (you do know what that means don't you?) then you should have no say in how it is run. If you don't care enough about the country to protect it then why should you be in a position to make decisions concerning its function?

In my opinion the purpose of a government is to provide the security that would allow ME to keep my life, and pursue my own happiness. It is not up to the government to provide me with that happiness. And right now, the government does mismanage my taxes and your taxes and everyone else who pays taxes.

Your response is of course witty, but lacks a certain intellectual honesty.
__________________
Its better to have fussed and crabbed then never to have fussed at all - Lucy
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 10:17 AM
nathanbforrest45's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: mountains of East TN
Posts: 8,985
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wibblyesq View Post
Ah, excluding the poor and handicapped, a tactic worthy of the National Socialists..

How does that exclude the poor and the handicapped? My daughter is totally deaf, so is her husband. Both work for private companies, own a home, have two children in private school and take no money from the government. How would they be excluded under Gummer's proposal?
__________________
Its better to have fussed and crabbed then never to have fussed at all - Lucy
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 10:21 AM
wibblyesq's Avatar
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 281
Default

Oooh great, refute me with an anecdote.

There are other handicaps than being deaf..
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 10:33 AM
nathanbforrest45's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: mountains of East TN
Posts: 8,985
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wibblyesq View Post
Oooh great, refute me with an anecdote.

There are other handicaps than being deaf..
The point is that being handicapped does not mean unable to work and dependent upon the government. If you can't see that, well there is nothing that can be said is there.

My question still remains, how does Gummer's proposal stop the poor and the handicapped from being able to vote?
__________________
Its better to have fussed and crabbed then never to have fussed at all - Lucy
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 10:37 AM
Gummer's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The deep end of the gene pool
Posts: 1,188
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wibblyesq View Post
Oooh great, refute me with an anecdote.

There are other handicaps than being deaf..
Admit it.... you are satisfied with with the libs loading up the short bus at the "group home" and taking them to register to vote and showing them how to vote for democrats ..... ditto for ILLEGAL aliens ..... but..... if we had some minimal standards for voter qualification ..... it's unlikely dems would EVER win another election ....
__________________
Definition of political correctness:
A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical liberal minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.

I'm politically incorrect and damn well satisfied to be so. Gummer
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 10:43 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,628
Default

No public assistance?


Nix all the Republicant farmers.
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 11:21 AM
nathanbforrest45's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: mountains of East TN
Posts: 8,985
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by A. Crowley View Post
No public assistance?


Nix all the Republicant farmers.
Would farmers who are Democrats then be allowed to receive subsidies and still be able to vote? Or is your contention that all farmers are Republicans?

As a footnote, I agree that ALL subsidies should be eliminated as soon as possible.
__________________
Its better to have fussed and crabbed then never to have fussed at all - Lucy
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 07:33 PM
areyoushittin'me?'s Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: On the wall behind you.
Posts: 2,756
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nathanbforrest45 View Post
As usual shitforbrains you have managed to entirely miss the meaning of a post.
Shit for brains? Now that's funny...areyoushittin'me?...shitforbrains...were you makin' fun of my name?

What was that you were saying about getting back to the meaning of the post?


Quote:
Originally Posted by nathanbforrest45 View Post
I did not say the only purpose of the government was the military, although that is the main purpose of a government in my opinion.
Nor did I say that you did.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nathanbforrest45 View Post
I said that if you were not willing to defend the country (you do know what that means don't you?) then you should have no say in how it is run. If you don't care enough about the country to protect it then why should you be in a position to make decisions concerning its function?
Right, and I questioned you to get clarification...it is appearing that you missed the concept I was trying to express...it appears that you carry a certain sort of belief that a sense of importance and privilege above and beyond other forms of service is justified...I'm just betting there are many people who might take exception to that notion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nathanbforrest45 View Post
In my opinion the purpose of a government is to provide the security that would allow ME to keep my life, and pursue my own happiness. It is not up to the government to provide me with that happiness. And right now, the government does mismanage my taxes and your taxes and everyone else who pays taxes.
Agreed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nathanbforrest45 View Post
Your response is of course witty, but lacks a certain intellectual honesty.
Thanks, I enjoy being witty, as to intellectual honesty...your turn.
__________________
"All the problems we face in the United States today can be traced to an unenlightened immigration policy on the part of the American Indian."

Pat Paulsen for President

It's a sad time when our political process is centered on negative attacks on another rather than concentrating on our own accomplishments.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


» Navigation

Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!


$5 monthly donation:

$10 monthly donation:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Poltical Topsites PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings