I've heard many times that Republicans are souless money grubbers and that Democrats are with out a conscious for right and wrong if it will gain them popularity.


Now, what I want to address is what's worse: your motivation being money or your motivation being popularity?

They both are selfish, but they end up having different reactions. And, one reaction has to be worse than the other.

__________________
"If I didn't live in Ohio I would love to live in Texas, it's the only place where drinking beer and kickin' ass is still accepted." -Roman

Loaded question. I won't sell myself out due to popular opinion or what is politically correct to say, but also I wouldn't say I am motivated by money. Those that know me, know I am about thrifty as they come, but I also will help someone else save a buck, too. So, in my own opinion, I am not guilty of either, but find that motivation of popularity turns to greed to feed the ego. So, I guess they go hand in hand, what political party do I represent then?

I really meant to just ask which was the worse vice: being the person that would run over anybody to get what they want or being the person that would do anything and loose all of their morals to have popularity.

__________________
"If I didn't live in Ohio I would love to live in Texas, it's the only place where drinking beer and kickin' ass is still accepted." -Roman

Yellow, they are both are unnecessary evils of man.