IHNR vs. 36 and Carson on ANY ISSUE... LOL

IHNR · #1 (**permalink**) 01-26-2008, 10:56 AM

Come on boys... want to debate a subject or better yet would care to let me teach the both of you something, anything?

Carson · #2 (**permalink**) 01-26-2008, 11:58 AM

criptard your a waste of my breathe.

ONEWHITEDUCK · #3 (**permalink**) 01-26-2008, 12:04 PM

IS AREYOUFOREAL A FED-UP FAT FUCK ehehehehhehehehehe

WHAT A TROLL

Carson · #4 (**permalink**) 02-11-2008, 06:45 PM

I posted twice, where the fuck u at, I guess u are the most ineffectual poster on this website

IHNR · #5 (**permalink**) 02-12-2008, 02:44 PM

Again... make you case for WHY YOU ABSOLUTELY NEED A GUN. Have you ever been been a victim of a violent crime?

36shadow · #6 (**permalink**) 02-12-2008, 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IHNR

Again... make you case for WHY YOU ABSOLUTELY NEED A GUN. Have you ever been been a victim of a violent crime?

Ya I have been a victim of a few crimes in my life got shot at once by a gang banger after leaving work as a bouncer. So what is your point, do cops carry guns are they victims of violent crimes? Here is a question for you. When they passed the assault rifle ban in california and many had some and have had them for years and they paid good money for them. Question do you think it was legal or the right of the police to take them and not pay the citazen for them? Debate that

36shadow · #7 (**permalink**) 02-12-2008, 03:06 PM

come on cripple wheel up to the bar.

IHNR · #8 (**permalink**) 02-12-2008, 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 36shadow

Ya I have been a victim of a few crimes in my life got shot at once by a gang banger after leaving work as a bouncer. So what is your point, do cops carry guns are they victims of violent crimes? Here is a question for you. When they passed the assault rifle ban in california and many had some and have had them for years and they paid good money for them. Question do you think it was legal or the right of the police to take them and not pay the citazen for them? Debate that

Bouncer huh? Did you get your bachelors in bouncing or did your only gain assciates status. Well, when you are a bouncer it's probably really smart wearing a gun, especially after you get your bitch ass beat down and excuted with your own fucking gun.

Taking the assult rifles falls under imminate laws and yeah, it's good to take the guns of gang bangers and if you aren't a gang banger why would need a fucking assult rifle but from my experience it's most often pussies who carry, because they are... you know... fucking pussies.

Does this apply to you?

36shadow · #9 (**permalink**) 02-12-2008, 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IHNR

Bouncer huh? Did you get your bachelors in bouncing or did your only gain assciates status. Well, when you are a bouncer it's probably really smart wearing a gun, especially after you get your bitch ass beat down and excuted with your own fucking gun.

Taking the assult rifles falls under imminate laws and yeah, it's good to take the guns of gang bangers and if you aren't a gang banger why would need a fucking assult rifle but from my experience it's most often pussies who carry, because they are... you know... fucking pussies.

Does this apply to you?

So you said any topic not bait and avoid the questions so you can just bash. So I will give you one more chance answer the fucking question or keep on with you banter so everyone can see that your just a hateful self loathing cripple. One I was a bouncer to help pay for college two it was a friends bar three didn't carry a gun.. No I don't own or have I ever an assault rifle and did not imply so what I did ask is if you believed it was legal or constitutional for them to take them and not pay the citazen no money? now answer or fuck off.

IHNR · #10 (**permalink**) 02-13-2008, 12:43 PM

I ask you this question... does the Constitution in the second amendment say ANYTHING about guns?? It refers to arms, which is a broad term, which at this stage in history, as well as the founders original reason for adding this amendment was to allow the citizen to retaliate against their country if it because tyrancial or perhaps even taken over and turned into a theocracy (which it has) so this amendment would all you to purchase if you had the means; tanks, fighter jets, aircraft carriers and nuclear weapons. Do believe these items along with assault rifles are neccesary anymore? Because the intent ot the amendment is no longer valid, but like I said, it's there so if you assholes want to make for you lake of manhood with a 50 caliber cannon, well then go ahead. I just don't understand it...