1. To equip with weapons: armed themselves with loaded pistols; arm a missile with a warhead; arm a nation for war.

from your own link dommy...

__________________
BuildtheDream.org

I have answered every question put to me with a yes or no, dom you have NEVER USED EITHER FUCKING WORD ON FORUM LEST TO ANSWER A QUESTION.

I have asked you over and over again if non-violence works and you refuse to answer.

__________________
BuildtheDream.org

Those are definitions of arms, yes, just like firearms is. You said it wasn;t a definition, you were wrong.

I told you it was not the reason the British left India, which was what the debate was about. If you want to be proven a liar I can point to at least five different times I have given that answre and therefore you are once again proven to be a liar.

You have not answered every question, in fact, you haven't answered one of mine. Check out the ones below in bold and either answer them or point out to where you have alrady answered them.

Can you show where it says abortion in the Constitution?

Can you show where it says privacy in the Constitution?

Now, you can go ahead and answer those questions and then perhaps you will see how very fucking stupid your line of reasoning is.

WHAT... you have no proof for WHY yet nerely all in the scholarly commununity point to the THORN in BRITISH COLONIAL WAS INFACT GANDHI was he not?

You can't prove this isn't true except with your large selection BRITISH who agree with you LOL...

The problem with you dom first off (and I actually don't mean this as a slam) but you are really not that bright, so it is difficult debating these issues with you. You think that the debate is about India, when the debate concern non-violence and it's ability to produce change. It does period and you can't prove me wrong... At the very least the only thing you have argued is that not everyone believed as Gandhi did that that his beliefs were the way to solve india's problems, also there is the fact that he was killed by a VIOLENT FUCKING ASSHOLE, so we don't know what might have happened if he had lived, just Lincoln, JFK, RFK and MLK whose dangerous ideas got them killed.

Also you never answered the questions concerning Africa where Gandhi was very successful with his ideas of non-violence and he exact change. Admit it.

__________________
BuildtheDream.org

I told you it was not the reason the British left India, which was what the debate was about. If you want to be proven a liar I can point to at least five different times I have given that answre and therefore you are once again proven to be a liar.

You have not answered every question, in fact, you haven't answered one of mine. Check out the ones below in bold and either answer them or point out to where you have alrady answered them.

Yeah, it doesn't say anything about abortion in the constitution so stay out of people fucking business concerning abortion.

It doesn't say anything in the constitution concerning gay marriage so stay out of these people's fucking business.

Privacy, the right to be left alone. Privacy includes both freedom from government interference in private or family matters and confidentiality of such things as personal correspondence, telephone calls, e-mail, financial information, and medical histories. Courts in recent years have recognized a right to privacy implicit in the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights, but there are concerns that privacy may be eroded by the widespread use of advanced information technologies as well as those on the right who don't mind the government listening in on their phone calls.

__________________
BuildtheDream.org

So should bill gates be allowed to own a squadron of fighter jets, a battalion of tanks and small army, as well as silos surrounding his Seattle home with nuclear weapons that he could trigger from his MSN Smart phone? (kinda like blackwater, which should never be allowed to exist and wouldn’t if not for the second amendment)

He can afford it and under the strict interpretation of the 2 amendment he by law has the right to build his own private army.

Should he be allow to?

I dare you dom, I am CALLING YOU FUCKING OUT. I DARE YOU ANSWER WITH A YES OR NO ANSWER. I would wager nearly anything that you won't... let's see.

By the way... feel backed into a corner? Well you are! Come dommy give a Y or N

__________________
BuildtheDream.org

You sound like a little child that has never or ever will win an arguement with your wife or kids. If they are your kids hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

__________________
When you came into this world you cried.
Live your life so that when you die.
The world cries. the shadow

Ha ha... you admit to losing because this debate was never about fucking India it was about non-violence if it works or if you like if violence works... not about the fucking British leaving India, stupid.

By the way, you have no sources that prove without a shadow of a doubt that non-violence wasn't the reason for the British leaving. Even one of your brits admitted what that is "third the way down?" Sounds like non-violence works! Again, it's hard debating with someone less intelligent than yourself, which is why I have labored to keep you topic which constantly try to avoid. Example after example of the success NV has had...

So, now you are back peddling and making this about India??? HAAAHAHHAHHAH just admit that NV works and we'll me on to more examples how it works. I bet you are scared to death of Montgomery aren't you???

Why? Because it's the death knell of this debate... and I can't wait but if you want keep beating your dead horse keep it up.

By the way, I am still waiting for an answer concerning Gandhi's success in Africa.

__________________
BuildtheDream.org

I have a five year old... and a girlfriend whom I plan to marry so sorry for you. Oh and she's hot, unlike the quarter-ponder packed behemoths you and dommy crawl into bed with each night.

Basically, let me guess... both of your wives are fat? From what I've heard dom is fat... actually I think dom is gay as well as you 36 so you probably can't even get it up for what ever whale-fuck you are forced to endure once a month and on birthdays.

It's also at the point in an arguement when I know I've won when the opponent begins to make fun of my condition, which is pretty telling and pathetic just in general.

__________________
BuildtheDream.org

Actually, 36, I'm still waiting for you make an arguement. Do you have one?

__________________
BuildtheDream.org