Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > Organized Online Debates > Refereed Debate

test
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #161 (permalink)  
Old 03-06-2008, 10:32 PM
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Badmutha View Post
Lefty its you isnt it?? Anyways I already told you--I will enlist in the Army as soon as you enlist in Al Queda.

Oh so your not going to enlist and support what you promote? Well going by your standards--I guess that makes you a chickenhawk pussy boycunt.

Al Queda is waiting for your vest measurements--quit pussing out already

GoArmy.com

I guess you wont huh boy cunt ?

Still living with your buck tooth trailer trash cunt mother, and way too confy in the basement huh ? No job and no prospects, like the rest of the neo nazi right wing base
Invite the boy next door over when Mom is at the bingo parlor huh, for a little anal ?

Either sign up boy cunt, or admit what a pussy you are. Not that you need to, everyone knows

well...are you going to enlist...cunt ?
__________________
A brilliant mind and a superior intellect, no matter WHAT screen name I am logged in under

Some people say all Republicans are inbred ignorant southern hicks,,,,NOT TRUE…Some live in Indiana

It's quite simple really, I'm smarter then you
Reply With Quote
  #162 (permalink)  
Old 05-01-2008, 06:59 PM
Political Guru
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 810
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Badmutha View Post
Welcome (your name here) (D)--You pick the topic--make your leftist argument--and I shall begin the destruction of of your liberal ideology. With any luck you might become a conservative after being embarrased so badly. Well what are you waiting for comrade--come get some.
Okay, deal.

Death Penalty. Places that have more executions also seem to *need* more executions. What happens to deterence theory in the face of this numerical fact?
Reply With Quote
  #163 (permalink)  
Old 05-01-2008, 09:08 PM
Badmutha's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,539
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Agent_Grey View Post
Okay, deal.

Death Penalty. Places that have more executions also seem to *need* more executions. What happens to deterence theory in the face of this numerical fact?
Grey welcome.....lets begin with you showing these "numerical facts"--what data are you pulling from??

But lets say you have some sort of factual data that represents your statement....the info may still be meaningless in regards to the argument your trying to convey--unless you have data that shows a states (pre/post death penalty) crime and murder rates.

The deterent is only as effective as the risk is severe and as the punishment is harsh

How can you disagree......if you were fined $1,000 for speeding.......would you still speed?

If you had your hand chopped off for stealing....would the thought of theft even cross your mind?

While Im not promoting those punishments...I will say....there is no punishment more severe then death......anyone that murders another human being deserves nothing less than what they have dealt out.

Speed up death row...fewer mouths sucking on the democrat provided social tit (ie. my wallet)
__________________
AWE Super Referee 1) Similar to Democrat Super Delegates, my powers and my opinions are ten times more important than those of standard commoner referees... peasants 2) So powerful....the Refereed Debate category cannot contain me 3) I make my own rules...which you will follow 4) Get out of line and I will toss you in with the Duck
Reply With Quote
  #164 (permalink)  
Old 05-02-2008, 12:16 AM
Political Guru
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 810
Default

Badmutha;399693]Grey welcome.....lets begin with you showing these "numerical facts"--what data are you pulling from??

I can give a few examples that are easy enough to verify for yourself, but if you feel it insufficient for this informal discussion, I can gladly find and post links as needed tomorrow when I have more time.

Here are the few:

1. Basic one. There are many, many countries in the world in which there is no death penalty and a way lower murder rate. While obviously there are going to be other factors to take into account, it becomes very difficult to make a case for the death penalty being preventative in a place where the number of murders is small enough that it ceases to be possible to give a statistically significant number that are/are not being prevented.

2. No one commits a crime with the punishment in mind. People still commit murders in death penalty countries such are ours, and it's doubtful that they do so with the potential legal precedings in mind.

3. It was once said by a conservative optimist (I can find out who, I read it in Freakonomics, interesting book) that each execution may prevent as many as 9 murders by being a deterent. Mathamatically, if that were true, every person in Texas would have already been detered from committing murders based on who was executed in their life span, yet they still, obviously, commit them just the same.



How can you disagree......if you were fined $1,000 for speeding.......would you still speed?


Obviously not. But no one commits murder with the same carelessness that they speed for reasons that have nothing to do with potential consequence. The reward in speeding is pretty small compared to say, bumping someone off for insurance, and that's to say nothing of emotional killings done in the heat of the moment.

If you had your hand chopped off for stealing....would the thought of theft even cross your mind?

Ahhhh if it's a million dollar item and I might not get caught, yeah, I might try it. Also see the above in your previous example.
Reply With Quote
  #165 (permalink)  
Old 05-02-2008, 11:35 AM
Political Guru
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 810
Default

anyone that murders another human being deserves nothing less than what they have dealt out.

Even if that were true, which is in itself debatable, it still doesn't solve the problem of wrongful executions. What percentage of misfires are we uncomfortable with as a people when it comes to killing the wrongly convicted? As a big fat leftie, I'm obviously not comfortable with even a 0.1 percent margain of error when it comes to lethally injecting innocent people, but sure you must be able to provide a different number. Perhaps if half the executions were wrong? 75%?

Name your price, muchacho.
Reply With Quote
  #166 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2008, 12:33 PM
Badmutha's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,539
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Agent_Grey View Post
I can give a few examples that are easy enough to verify for yourself, but if you feel it insufficient for this informal discussion, I can gladly find and post links as needed tomorrow when I have more time.

Here are the few:

1. Basic one. There are many, many countries in the world in which there is no death penalty and a way lower murder rate. While obviously there are going to be other factors to take into account, it becomes very difficult to make a case for the death penalty being preventative in a place where the number of murders is small enough that it ceases to be possible to give a statistically significant number that are/are not being prevented.
Basic apples and oranges--your right about one thing--other factors have to be taken into account.

Quote:
2. No one commits a crime with the punishment in mind. People still commit murders in death penalty countries such are ours, and it's doubtful that they do so with the potential legal precedings in mind.
BS Grey--the majority of crimes are not crimes of passion or reactionary crimes--they are thought out--planned--and carried out with the full knowledge of the punishment that lies in wait.

Quote:
3. It was once said by a conservative optimist (I can find out who, I read it in Freakonomics, interesting book) that each execution may prevent as many as 9 murders by being a deterent. Mathamatically, if that were true, every person in Texas would have already been detered from committing murders based on who was executed in their life span, yet they still, obviously, commit them just the same.
9 murders??---is that a day--per year??? At the risk of sounding liberalish...I wonder how those 9 people would feel about your argument


Quote:
Obviously not. But no one commits murder with the same carelessness that they speed for reasons that have nothing to do with potential consequence. The reward in speeding is pretty small compared to say, bumping someone off for insurance, and that's to say nothing of emotional killings done in the heat of the moment.
Hence the punishment for murder is more severe than the punishment for speeding

Quote:
Ahhhh if it's a million dollar item and I might not get caught, yeah, I might try it. Also see the above in your previous example.
Which again is why the punishment for grand theft is more severe than the punishment for petty theft.

I just dont understand the premis of the argument your trying to convey??

--Are you trying to say punishment does not deter crime??
--Are you merely against executions all together??---and is it because of the .01% of wrongly convicted criminals.....if thats the case....I wonder if you have a problem with Life senteces.
__________________
AWE Super Referee 1) Similar to Democrat Super Delegates, my powers and my opinions are ten times more important than those of standard commoner referees... peasants 2) So powerful....the Refereed Debate category cannot contain me 3) I make my own rules...which you will follow 4) Get out of line and I will toss you in with the Duck
Reply With Quote
  #167 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2008, 12:35 PM
Political Guru
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 810
Default

=Badmutha;403262]Basic apples and oranges--your right about one thing--other factors have to be taken into account.

Sure, but that would sort of mean you're suggesting that the US is a failure in every OTHER regard EXCEPT the death penalty. That is atypical for a conservative argument...



BS Grey--the majority of crimes are not crimes of passion or reactionary crimes--they are thought out--planned--and carried out with the full knowledge of the punishment that lies in wait.

A. Why would it matter what the majority are? Even if it's just a handful of all murders, they are still murders that could never be deterred.


9 murders??---is that a day--per year??? At the risk of sounding liberalish...I wonder how those 9 people would feel about your argument

You're right, I misquoted the gentleman. It's *murderers* i.e. nine people who will never commit a murder EVER based on their fear of the death penalty.


--Are you trying to say punishment does not deter crime??

Of course not, but it is only effective to a point. Even in countries with horrid, tyranous rule and unforgiving laws, murders still occur. Plus, as a further elaboriation, there is so much more we could be doing in the way of crime prevention and rehabillitation. The death penalty is LAZY. It's throwing up our hands and accepting a problem without resistance.

Frankly, lying down and taking it is something I do NOT associate with conservatives, and I admire them for that. So why lie down here?

--Are you merely against executions all together??---and is it because of the .01% of wrongly convicted criminals.....if thats the case....I wonder if you have a problem with Life senteces.[/quote]

Of course I have no problem with life sentances. In cases when we've found the wrongly accused who have been sentanced to life, we've let them GO, even compensated them on occaison. That's fair. It's completely acceptable, and it gives them time and wisdom to do what they can to make ammends. Even if only 0.1 percent are innocent, are you suggesting so small a percentage is redeemable?
Reply With Quote
  #168 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2008, 05:19 PM
smart makes a comeback's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Uptown Chicago and the Green Mill on a regular basis
Posts: 2,068
Default

Looks like "Any(and every) Liberal out there" is handing sadmutha his ass huh ?
No surprise there.

Nice to see i am not the only one who can humiliate and own this sap on a regular basis
__________________
Argue with some..IGNORE the stupid

Yeah it hurts, you have been fucked by an Elephant !

"Happamia, sanoi kettu pihlajanmarjoista kun ei niihin yltänyt" ("Sour, said the fox about rowan berries, being unable to reach them"
Reply With Quote
  #169 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2008, 05:21 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 14,968
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smart makes a comeback View Post
Looks like "Any(and every) Liberal out there" is handing sadmutha his ass huh ?
No surprise there.

Nice to see i am not the only one who can humiliate and own this sap on a regular basis

LMFAO!

No kidding.
Reply With Quote
  #170 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 06:03 PM
Political Guru
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 810
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smart makes a comeback View Post
Looks like "Any(and every) Liberal out there" is handing sadmutha his ass huh ?
No surprise there.

Nice to see i am not the only one who can humiliate and own this sap on a regular basis
*sniffs*

I miss him so.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


» Navigation

Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!


test

$5 monthly donation:

$10 monthly donation:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Poltical Topsites PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings