Va Tech - Handguns - Japan Does Fine Without, Proof Positive!!

Skinny Fatts · #21 (**permalink**) 04-20-2007, 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by foundingfathers

I lived in Japan for 5 years and felt very safe walking anywhere at 3 a.m. - Not so in America because of our outdated gun policy and the idiotic second amendment.

Why use Japan as an example? Because it's a thriving democracy (exactly like America). This fact is in gun supporters face big time, guns don't kill people, bullets do!

Because criminals have guns is not enough reason to oppose gun control. We have a great deal of corruption with the NRA and their lobby in DC. Their special interest agenda is corrupt, their "contributions" or "bribes" mold US gun policy for the entire nation yet NRA members represent less than 1 percent of the population !!

You do the math, 1 percent of the population dictating gun policy for the other 99 percent of us? - - Bullshit x 10.

How many guns does Billy Bob need to hang in the rear window of his pickup to compensate for his small dick?

VA Tech is a great example and I'm from Virginia, know many that attended that school.

Japan? Nice. How about America. Remember Kennesaw, Georgia? Mandatory gun ownership. Interesting story. I've posted two links. Only one gives actual statistics. I'll leave it to you to determine why that might be.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070418/...ooting_town_dc
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1818862/posts

Mom_Adams · #22 (**permalink**) 04-20-2007, 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by foundingfathers

I lived in Japan for 5 years and felt very safe walking anywhere at 3 a.m. - Not so in America because of our outdated gun policy and the idiotic second amendment.

Why use Japan as an example? Because it's a thriving democracy (exactly like America). This fact is in gun supporters face big time, guns don't kill people, bullets do!

Because criminals have guns is not enough reason to oppose gun control. We have a great deal of corruption with the NRA and their lobby in DC. Their special interest agenda is corrupt, their "contributions" or "bribes" mold US gun policy for the entire nation yet NRA members represent less than 1 percent of the population !!

You do the math, 1 percent of the population dictating gun policy for the other 99 percent of us? - - Bullshit x 10.

How many guns does Billy Bob need to hang in the rear window of his pickup to compensate for his small dick?

VA Tech is a great example and I'm from Virginia, know many that attended that school.

I can't even believe you're using Japan as an example for proving your gun ban rant. But I'm glad you did.

Because on the same day that the shootings took place at Virginia Tech, Nagasaki's mayor Iccho Ito, was shot twice in the back and killed by Tetsuya Shiroo, a senior member of Japan's largest crime syndicate. In a country where law abiding citizens face strict gun laws, the mob does most of the shooting. And on a campus (VT) that had a strict gun ban, the same held true. The law abiding faculty, staff and students had no guns to defend themselves, but the guy who murdered 33 of them did because THE BAD GUYS DON'T CARE ABOUT LAWS.

So the only positive proof here is that you don't know what you're talking about.

Mom_Adams · #23 (**permalink**) 04-20-2007, 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave

70 million Americans own guns, most of those are hunting rifles or shot guns not modified for other reasons. 70 divided by 285 million is 1/4 of America.

I agree, have the hunting rifles, shotguns, no problem.

The hand guns, the semi automatic realm have no position of reference for justification.

A shotgun or rifle is defense enough against criminals in the home. If one can't carry such a large weapon outside the home,.....DON'T GO TO HIGH RISK AREAS!!

Most gun supporters need Cialis or Viagra, the gun is very closely related to the penis or the lack there of for most people that need to compensate for what God did not give them..........Get over it pee wee penis guy.

Uh Dave, You say that gun advocates are trying to compensate for penis size. But you also say you advocate owning rifles and shotguns, but not smaller handguns. Based on your logic you're trying to compensate for what you don't have and those who prefer the smaller handguns apparently aren't the ones in need of Cialis or Viagra. (LOL)