Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > Specific Political Issues > Gun Control
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-01-2008, 07:41 AM
nathanbforrest45's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: mountains of East TN
Posts: 8,651
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by noneof yourbusiness View Post
I think its fuckign hillarious that every city I have been in, the road named after MLK is a in a shithole area overun with Black thugs and rampent with murder and crime. Irony is funny to me.
What exactly does this have to do with the topic of this thread?
__________________
Its better to have fussed and crabbed then never to have fussed at all - Lucy
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 04-01-2008, 06:13 PM
rob's Avatar
rob rob is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SW Oklahoma
Posts: 13,580
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via MSN to rob
Default

I have the right to own a firearm to protect my home and family. I will not be disarmed regardless.
__________________
An informed voter scares the Goverment lackeys.

An American first and always a Conservative.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 04-01-2008, 06:18 PM
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 236
Blog Entries: 1
Default

One of the first things Hitler did was get laws passed that took firearms from Jews. Right after that, they rounded them up...

I fear the Left Wing in this country. They would have us ignore the threats domestic and foreign to suit their follies. Too bad the perps cant kill based on political orientation.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 04-01-2008, 09:57 PM
DammitBoy!'s Avatar
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: under a bridge
Posts: 634
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by gbig View Post
One of the first things Hitler did was get laws passed that took firearms from Jews. Right after that, they rounded them up...

This is historically inaccurate. Germany enacted severe gun ownership restrictions before Hitler came to power.

He just took advantage of those idiotic laws.
__________________
Noun

asshelmet http://www.asshelmets.com/forum/index.php

1. (Internet, pejorative) Statement expressing that someone is so stupid, they use their ass as a helmet; a stronger insult than asshat.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 04-01-2008, 10:01 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 10,533
Default

Replace Jews with Muslims, and Hitler hated all the same people RightWingers do.

Used the same tactics too.


Ya'll are a bunch of idiots and whackjobs.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 07:48 AM
satv365's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 3,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DammitBoy! View Post
This is historically inaccurate. Germany enacted severe gun ownership restrictions before Hitler came to power.

He just took advantage of those idiotic laws.
It is rather accurate. The Nazi Regime took them away from Jews. The predecessor regulated them for everyone. The Nazis, specifically disarmed the Jews.
__________________
"It is the Right of the People to alter or abolish the Government"
Declaration of Independence
"Never trouble another for what you can do for yourself."
Thomas Jefferson
"If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand."
Milton Friedman
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 12:49 PM
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 236
Blog Entries: 1
Default Nazi Gun Control

Quote:
Originally Posted by DammitBoy! View Post
This is historically inaccurate. Germany enacted severe gun ownership restrictions before Hitler came to power.

He just took advantage of those idiotic laws.
Not innacurate:

"The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let's not have any native militia or native police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order throughout the occupied Russian territories, and a system of military strong-points must be evolved to cover the entire occupied country." --Adolf Hitler

It is true that the original ban on arms was in the 1928 Weimer Republic - they wanted to keep the brownshirts from having them. Then tell us how the brown shirts and later Nazis were able to carry them, even openly? Because Hitler, in 1938 amended the law to focus on Jews alone. They were banned from carrying them, from having a business selling them, and from even handling them.

So, lets split hairs on it, okay?
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 03:12 PM
nathanbforrest45's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: mountains of East TN
Posts: 8,651
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gbig View Post
Not innacurate:

"The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let's not have any native militia or native police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order throughout the occupied Russian territories, and a system of military strong-points must be evolved to cover the entire occupied country." --Adolf Hitler

It is true that the original ban on arms was in the 1928 Weimer Republic - they wanted to keep the brownshirts from having them. Then tell us how the brown shirts and later Nazis were able to carry them, even openly? Because Hitler, in 1938 amended the law to focus on Jews alone. They were banned from carrying them, from having a business selling them, and from even handling them.

So, lets split hairs on it, okay?
The same is true in Dafur today. Christians are banned from owning guns, Muslims are not. Muslims are killing Christians by the thousands
__________________
Its better to have fussed and crabbed then never to have fussed at all - Lucy
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 05:06 PM
DammitBoy!'s Avatar
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: under a bridge
Posts: 634
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by gbig View Post
It is true that the original ban on arms was in the 1928 Weimer Republic - they wanted to keep the brownshirts from having them.

Then tell us how the brown shirts and later Nazis were able to carry them, even openly? Because Hitler, in 1938 amended the law to focus on Jews alone. They were banned from carrying them, from having a business selling them, and from even handling them.

So, lets split hairs on it, okay?

Much better, you win a cookie!
__________________
Noun

asshelmet http://www.asshelmets.com/forum/index.php

1. (Internet, pejorative) Statement expressing that someone is so stupid, they use their ass as a helmet; a stronger insult than asshat.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 07:57 PM
satv365's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 3,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nathanbforrest45 View Post
The same is true in Dafur today. Christians are banned from owning guns, Muslims are not. Muslims are killing Christians by the thousands
There are organizations that take donations to buy weapons for victims of genocide. You would be surprised what 200 kalishnikovs and a stockpile of ammo can do to set things right.
__________________
"It is the Right of the People to alter or abolish the Government"
Declaration of Independence
"Never trouble another for what you can do for yourself."
Thomas Jefferson
"If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand."
Milton Friedman
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



» Navigation
Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Poltical Topsites PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings