Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > Specific Political Issues > Gun Control
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2008, 07:11 AM
Yellowjacket's Avatar
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 173
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SaintMalaclypse View Post
The SC will say it is not a violation of the 2nd Amendment, because it isn't. The District of Columbia is under the sole rule of the Federal Government, and not subject to the Bill of Rights guaranteed to the States and the People of those States. The reason they'll find it perfectly Constitutional is that they will fool most Americans into believeing that their ruling also applies to the States.

Then they can always lean either way...if the People swallow it, they'll let them be deceived. If the People start slaughtering Politicians in the streets, they SC will clarify and say "Nonono....not EVERYWHERE, just outside the States. Washington DC isn't under the protection of States Rights, silly people."

It's an experiment. Nothing more. Guns have been banned in DC for a long time...it's being addressed just to test the waters and see if We the People are ready to surrender our 2nd Amendment rights yet, or if they should wait a little longer to take those rights.
The District of Columbia IS under the same Bill of Rights restrictions as the states, and residents there enjoy the same Constitutional protections as residents of the several states. The supreme court has ruled so in Callan v. Wilson, Wright v. Davidson and other cases.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2008, 08:08 AM
jan's Avatar
jan jan is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,506
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yellowjacket View Post
The District of Columbia IS under the same Bill of Rights restrictions as the states, and residents there enjoy the same Constitutional protections as residents of the several states. The supreme court has ruled so in Callan v. Wilson, Wright v. Davidson and other cases.

Do I know you from somewhere?
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2008, 09:18 AM
nathanbforrest45's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: mountains of East TN
Posts: 8,651
Default

It is interesting to note that Washington DC has the most draconian anti gun laws in the nation and the highest murder rate in the nation. Every state that has passed Right to Carry laws has seen a drop in murders, rapes and crimes in general. In 1973 three women were brutally raped and tortured although they called the police on several occasions. The police never showed up. The women sued the police but lost the case when the DC courts said the "police have no duty to protect any specific individual" If the police are not required to protect me then just exactly who will protect me if not myself?

The anti gun laws in that shithole called The District of Columbia are designed to promote criminal activiity by leaving all law abiding citizens vunerable and unprotected. Instead of allowing the people to protect themselves the DC "leadership" ("that bitch set me up") blames the law abiding people of the surrounding states for their inability to turn that travesty of our nation's capitol into something other than a third world country. Anyone who has ever visited Washington DC knows that you don't want to be on the streets after dark in any area and even before dark on most streets.
__________________
Its better to have fussed and crabbed then never to have fussed at all - Lucy
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2008, 06:20 PM
Yellowjacket's Avatar
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 173
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jan View Post
Do I know you from somewhere?
I don't know, ever spend time in Southern Ohio?

Last edited by Yellowjacket : 03-27-2008 at 06:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2008, 10:04 PM
satv365's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 3,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yellowjacket View Post
I don't know, ever spend time in Southern Ohio?
Next to the big butter Jesus?
__________________
"It is the Right of the People to alter or abolish the Government"
Declaration of Independence
"Never trouble another for what you can do for yourself."
Thomas Jefferson
"If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand."
Milton Friedman
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2008, 10:27 PM
Positive's Avatar
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 187
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nathanbforrest45 View Post
It is interesting to note that Washington DC has the most draconian anti gun laws in the nation and the highest murder rate in the nation. Every state that has passed Right to Carry laws has seen a drop in murders, rapes and crimes in general. In 1973 three women were brutally raped and tortured although they called the police on several occasions. The police never showed up. The women sued the police but lost the case when the DC courts said the "police have no duty to protect any specific individual" If the police are not required to protect me then just exactly who will protect me if not myself?

The anti gun laws in that shithole called The District of Columbia are designed to promote criminal activiity by leaving all law abiding citizens vunerable and unprotected. Instead of allowing the people to protect themselves the DC "leadership" ("that bitch set me up") blames the law abiding people of the surrounding states for their inability to turn that travesty of our nation's capitol into something other than a third world country. Anyone who has ever visited Washington DC knows that you don't want to be on the streets after dark in any area and even before dark on most streets.
Exactly my feelings on the subject. If liberals want to decrease gun violence take the weapons from the negro, the vast majority of crimes with weapons are committed by the american negro. Not PC, but true.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 04-05-2008, 07:33 AM
Razzputin's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,372
Default Have you taken a look at what is loose in the streets of Washington D.C.???

Quote:
Originally Posted by nathanbforrest45 View Post
It is interesting to note that Washington DC has the most draconian anti gun laws in the nation and the highest murder rate in the nation. Every state that has passed Right to Carry laws has seen a drop in murders, rapes and crimes in general. In 1973 three women were brutally raped and tortured although they called the police on several occasions. The police never showed up. The women sued the police but lost the case when the DC courts said the "police have no duty to protect any specific individual" If the police are not required to protect me then just exactly who will protect me if not myself?

The anti gun laws in that shithole called The District of Columbia are designed to promote criminal activiity by leaving all law abiding citizens vunerable and unprotected. Instead of allowing the people to protect themselves the DC "leadership" ("that bitch set me up") blames the law abiding people of the surrounding states for their inability to turn that travesty of our nation's capitol into something other than a third world country. Anyone who has ever visited Washington DC knows that you don't want to be on the streets after dark in any area and even before dark on most streets.
Have you taken a look at what is loose in the streets of Washington D.C.??? The place is saturated with idiots and lunatics that cant even take care of local services. Every year a volunteer squad of professionals - free of charge - has to step forward and help them get the services budeted and started, the schools opened up, tax matters attended to, expenditures and revenues projected and dealt with.....why dont you talk a walk through the streets of Washington D.C. and you will understand what the fuk you are dealing with insofar as the mentallity of a large portion of the residents?
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 04-05-2008, 07:34 AM
Razzputin's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,372
Default

As long as criminals have guns, the public will need guns to protect themselves. Relying on the police to solve all of your personal protection needs is lunacy.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2008, 06:16 AM
satv365's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 3,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Positive View Post
Exactly my feelings on the subject. If liberals want to decrease gun violence take the weapons from the negro, the vast majority of crimes with weapons are committed by the american negro. Not PC, but true.
Or allow the Negro to defend himself from the Criminals who own and operate the commerce of the Ghetto. Gun Control was set up to disarm blacks in the first place. It stays true to it's original intent, along with the countless ohter problems it causes.
__________________
"It is the Right of the People to alter or abolish the Government"
Declaration of Independence
"Never trouble another for what you can do for yourself."
Thomas Jefferson
"If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand."
Milton Friedman
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 04-08-2008, 08:11 PM
SaintMalaclypse's Avatar
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: I go where the jellyfish are plentiful and the air burns like a whore's rash.
Posts: 253
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yellowjacket View Post
The District of Columbia IS under the same Bill of Rights restrictions as the states, and residents there enjoy the same Constitutional protections as residents of the several states. The supreme court has ruled so in Callan v. Wilson, Wright v. Davidson and other cases.
Technically, you're right. But they get their rights handed to them piecemeal, and have to fight for some of them (such as Representation, Voting Rights, and Right to Bear Arms). They are under special, limited rights protection because of the clause in the Constitution that says :
Quote:
[The Congress shall have Power] To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular states, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the government of the United States."
In strict legalese, they have the same rights afforded any U.S. Citizen. But in reality, they aren't allowed those rights by the Federal Governments typical "give an inch, take a mile" legislation. But I guess the same holds true whether you live in a State or not...D.C. just gets some of the worst treatment. They can't get truly fair treatement comparable to the States, since they are taxed without representation. Not even the States get that kind of screwing.
__________________
Global Warming is my favorite color.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



» Navigation
Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Poltical Topsites PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings