[quote=Khappa09;316581]the only problem with that is that you cant count on others to do that even if there told. the person might also not even care what they have to say. [/Quote}
Whoa...wait a dang minute there bud. You just gave the best reason as to why you DO NOT want gun control. If you can't count on others, then you can only count on yourself and thus the reason as to why the second amendment is an individual right! Sometimes you have to do things yourself!
Providing for your individual security or safety is your responsibility--period. Just try asking a police officer to come help you BEFORE an incident...it won't happen. You all need to get this through your minds... turning over your responsibilities to government will only buy you a false sense that you are being taken care of.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Khappa09
so gun control could of because the vt shooter had a background and if a proper or more in depth background search was made then it could have been prevented
|
There was a proper background check and the idea that there is such a thing as "more in depth" is a fallacy and even at that, by your own admission, you can not count on others--they are not perfect. The closest thing you can get to perfection is to have an armed soceity...it is truly a polite society. The shooter would have thought twice knowing that anyone could be armed and maybe even more proficient than he is/was with a firearm and if that wasn't enough of a deterrent someone armed when he first started shooting would have most certainly shot back and stopped him or would have slowed him down while others who were close by would have certainly arrived with their firearms and simply out gunned him and stopped him. Instead he was allowed to run wild on campus and reload at will with no threat to himself.
