Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > Specific Political Issues > Gun Control

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2008, 01:57 AM
Oedipus Rex's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: San Diego, Ca
Posts: 2,237
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghostdog View Post
Again, Different States have diferent laws. So what do you want for
not having registered guns? a cookie or cracker? However, you seem
like one of them (I do not give a damn about the law), but frankly I am
not aware to your state laws, and I am should that IF theres a law in
your State I pray that your slick ass don't get caught Mr Boostful.

Because here in Michigan a un registered gun is against the law, and
a individual can go to jail for being slick like you.
LOL! California is where I live. They do have gun registration laws here, but I'm special. I don't have to register my weapons and I brought them in from another state. How like them apples?
__________________
THAT explains it!!!



Word of warning... I don't play well with others.
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2008, 01:21 PM
Yellowjacket's Avatar
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 173
Default

Quote:
Mental evals help stop those that are a danger to themselves and others from owning guns that could be used in school shootings and etc. Do you really want a person that was diagnosed as a danger (but is one medication to help that) to own a gun?
The problem with your theory is, that would place my rights and everyone else's rights in the hand of government beaurocrats with a psychology degree. Many of these "doctors" are vehemently anti-gun and would slant their opinions to disarm as many people as possible regardless of actual mental state. Where my rights are concerned, I trust them to NO ONE.

Quote:
And training courses are designed not to deter gun ownership but to help the people buying them to know how to use those guns in a effective and safe manner.
I have been a long-time advocate of gun safety classes as part of every childs school curriculum, starting with basic "don't touch, call an adult" at the kindergarten level, to hands on training to include basic marksmanship at the higher grade level. Take away the "forbidden fruit" concept and a child is less likely to let curiosity lead them to sneaking and mishandling someone's gun, plus many kids will gain a new respect for a firearm's capability if they actually shoot one in a controlled environment.

Quote:
You would rather wait till 20 or 30 people are killed in a school shooting because the person was mentally unstable and stopped taking his/her medication to punish that person (if he/she did not that his/her own life first) then to try and prevent said mentally unstable person from getting that gun in the first place?
No, I would rather see lawfully armed teachers and adult students if they so choose, so when a lunatic attempts said crime, someone has the ability and stops him / her instead of becoming a legally disarmed victim. It's no coincidence that these mass shootings always seem to take place in "no-gun" zones. When is the last time a lunatic killed 20 or 30 cops at a police convention?
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2008, 01:47 PM
satv365's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 3,153
Default

This argument is dumb. Colleges and Universities should have had better security. I suspect they will beef it up in the future. This kind of crap would not have happened in a High School. With Cops and Metal Detectors everywhere, nowadays, At least at the local high school around here.

Shit is gonna happen regardless of Arbitrary gun control measures taken with a sensationalist, reactionary feeling about recent events. Of which, I am glad noone here is a policy maker. Since everytime someone dies of a gun shot, you would all be the first to enact arbitrary laws, to the point of banning specific makes and models on the basis that certain killers decided to use a remington 12 guage, as opposed to a FNS-p90.

So let it go. We have always had guns. The problem is not guns or gun control. It is stupid people, all around.
__________________
"It is the Right of the People to alter or abolish the Government"
Declaration of Independence
"Never trouble another for what you can do for yourself."
Thomas Jefferson
"If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand."
Milton Friedman
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2008, 02:57 PM
Yellowjacket's Avatar
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 173
Default

Quote:
Colleges and Universities should have had better security.
Why is it the responsibility of the college/university/shopping mall etc. to provide for your safety and security? Your personal security should be your responsibility. The ONLY reason they should have to assume any responsibility is if they deny your right to provide for your own safety, such as many have done. Allowing law abiding adults to be armed is the best security.
Quote:
"Those who would give up essential Liberty to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-- Ben Franklin, Respectfully Quoted, p. 201, Suzy Platt, Barnes & Noble, 1993
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2008, 07:11 PM
rob's Avatar
rob rob is online now
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SW Oklahoma
Posts: 14,435
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via MSN to rob
Default


Guns Save Lives

By John Stossel

It's all too predictable. A day after a gunman killed six people and wounded 18 others at Northern Illinois University, The New York Times criticized the U.S. Interior Department for preparing to rethink its ban on guns in national parks.
The editorial board wants "the 51 senators who like the thought of guns in the parks -- and everywhere else, it seems -- to realize that the innocence of Americans is better protected by carefully controlling guns than it is by arming everyone to the teeth."
As usual, the Times editors seem unaware of how silly their argument is. To them, the choice is between "carefully controlling guns" and "arming everyone to the teeth." But no one favors "arming everyone to the teeth" (whatever that means). Instead, gun advocates favor freedom, choice and self-responsibility. If someone wishes to be prepared to defend himself, he should be free to do so. No one has the right to deprive others of the means of effective self-defense, like a handgun.

As for the first option, "carefully controlling guns," how many shootings at schools or malls will it take before we understand that people who intend to kill are not deterred by gun laws? Last I checked, murder is against the law everywhere. No one intent on murder will be stopped by the prospect of committing a lesser crime like illegal possession of a firearm. The intellectuals and politicians who make pious declarations about controlling guns should explain how their gunless utopia is to be realized.
While they search for -- excuse me -- their magic bullet, innocent people are dying defenseless.
That's because laws that make it difficult or impossible to carry a concealed handgun do deter one group of people: law-abiding citizens who might have used a gun to stop crime. Gun laws are laws against self-defense.
Criminals have the initiative. They choose the time, place and manner of their crimes, and they tend to make choices that maximize their own, not their victims', success. So criminals don't attack people they know are armed, and anyone thinking of committing mass murder is likely to be attracted to a gun-free zone, such as schools and malls.
Government may promise to protect us from criminals, but it cannot deliver on that promise. This was neatly summed up in book title a few years ago: "Dial 911 and Die." If you are the target of a crime, only one other person besides the criminal is sure to be on the scene: you. There is no good substitute for self-responsibility.
How, then, does it make sense to create mandatory gun-free zones, which in reality are free-crime zones?
The usual suspects keep calling for more gun control laws. But this idea that gun control is crime control is just a myth. The National Academy of Sciences reviewed dozens of studies and could not find a single gun regulation that clearly led to reduced violent crime or murder. When Washington, D.C., passed its tough handgun ban years ago, gun violence rose.
The press ignores the fact that often guns save lives.
It's what happened in 2002 at the Appalachian School of Law. Hearing shots, two students went to their cars, got their guns and restrained the shooter until police arrested him.
Likewise, law professor Glenn Reynolds writes, "Pearl, Miss., school shooter Luke Woodham was stopped when the school's vice principal took a .45 from his truck and ran to the scene. In (last) February's Utah mall shooting, it was an off-duty police officer who happened to be on the scene and carrying a gun".
It's impossible to know exactly how often guns stop criminals. Would-be victims don't usually report crimes that don't happen. But people use guns in self-defense every day. The Cato Institute's Tom Palmer says just showing his gun to muggers once saved his life.
"It equalizes unequals," Palmer told "20/20". "If someone gets into your house, which would you rather have, a handgun or a telephone? You can call the police if you want, and they'll get there, and they'll take a picture of your dead body. But they can't get there in time to save your life. The first line of defense is you."
__________________
An informed voter scares the Goverment lackeys.

An American first and always a Conservative.
Reply With Quote
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2008, 07:18 PM
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: My house
Posts: 408
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by naturemomma View Post
Just a reminder to all those for gun control..........

A LITTLE GUN HISTORY

In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated
------------------------------
In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------
Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, a total of
13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------
China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------
Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------
Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------
Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million educated people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
-----------------------------
Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control: 56 million.
------------------------------
It has now been 12 months since gun owners in Australia were forced by new law to surrender (involuntary buy back) 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by their own government, a program costing Australia taxpayers more than $500 million dollars. The first year results are now in:

List of 7 items:

Australia-wide, homicides are up 3.2 percent.

Australia-wide, assaults are up 8.6 percent.

Australia-wide, arme d robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44 percent)!

In the state of Victoria alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent. Note that while the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the criminals did not, and criminals still possess their guns!


While figures over the previous 25 years showed a steady decrease in armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically upward in the past 12 months, since criminals now are guaranteed that their prey is unarmed.

There has also been a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults of the ELDERLY.

Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public safety has decreased, after such monumental effort and expense was expended in successfully ridding Australian society of guns. The Australian experience and the other historical facts above prove it.

You won't see this data on the US evening news, or hear politicians disseminating this information.

Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws adversely affect only the law-abiding citizens.

Take note my fellow Americans, before it's too late!

The next time someone talks in favor of gun control, please remind them of this history lesson.

With guns, we are 'citizens'.
Without them, we are 'subjects'.

During WWII the Japanese decided not to invade America because they knew most Americans were ARMED!

If you value your freedom, Please spread this anti-gun control message to all of your friends.
Wow Nature, I think this is the first time I've agrred with you, better you aren't so bad after all.
__________________
Gun control is giving criminals guns and taken guns away from law abiding citizens.
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2008, 07:18 PM
Areyouforreal's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cowtown, Texas
Posts: 7,417
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yellowjacket View Post
The problem with your theory is, that would place my rights and everyone else's rights in the hand of government beaurocrats with a psychology degree. Many of these "doctors" are vehemently anti-gun and would slant their opinions to disarm as many people as possible regardless of actual mental state. Where my rights are concerned, I trust them to NO ONE.
That is a potential problem, I agree.
And while mental evals may not be the best, mental background checks are another way to go.

Quote:
I have been a long-time advocate of gun safety classes as part of every childs school curriculum, starting with basic "don't touch, call an adult" at the kindergarten level, to hands on training to include basic marksmanship at the higher grade level. Take away the "forbidden fruit" concept and a child is less likely to let curiosity lead them to sneaking and mishandling someone's gun, plus many kids will gain a new respect for a firearm's capability if they actually shoot one in a controlled environment.
Agreed


Quote:
No, I would rather see lawfully armed teachers and adult students if they so choose, so when a lunatic attempts said crime, someone has the ability and stops him / her instead of becoming a legally disarmed victim. It's no coincidence that these mass shootings always seem to take place in "no-gun" zones. When is the last time a lunatic killed 20 or 30 cops at a police convention?
I actually agree with that as well.
__________________
People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vp92vkXcC0w
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2008, 09:47 PM
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: My house
Posts: 408
Default

It's funny how no one has used fact, logic, or evidence to support any of their arguments besides Naturmomma, that's abnormal.
__________________
Gun control is giving criminals guns and taken guns away from law abiding citizens.
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2008, 11:22 PM
DammitBoy!'s Avatar
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: under a bridge
Posts: 756
Cool

I've got a little logic quiz for ya.

How many vehicular homicides have been prevented by registering the automobile?
__________________
Noun

asshelmet http://www.asshelmets.com/forum/index.php

1. (Internet, pejorative) Statement expressing that someone is so stupid, they use their ass as a helmet; a stronger insult than asshat.
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2008, 11:42 PM
satv365's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 3,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DammitBoy! View Post
I've got a little logic quiz for ya.

How many vehicular homicides have been prevented by registering the automobile?
Lulz. Registration of Automobiles and such is just a tax that you have to pay to get permission to drive, or travel.
__________________
"It is the Right of the People to alter or abolish the Government"
Declaration of Independence
"Never trouble another for what you can do for yourself."
Thomas Jefferson
"If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand."
Milton Friedman
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


» Navigation

Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!


$5 monthly donation:

$10 monthly donation:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Poltical Topsites PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings