"safer in my home without a gun"....huh????

__________________
Cussing out low class inbreds isnt uninteligent, its honest

Good typing is not inteligent its dexiteritous.

Everything you just said is total bullshit

Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-V8Ek...eature=related

IF YOU ARE ANTI-GUN....YOU ARE SEXUALLY IMMATURE....says Freud....ehehehehehe

AND FAGGOT CUNT SEXUALLY CUNT FUSED MOCKINGTURDS ARE ALL SEXUALLY IMMATURE

AND THE FAGGOTS USED FEMINISM AND THE MEDIA AND SITES LIKE TPA and FREESPEECH TV and HIPPYMOM...etc etc....... TO DO IT.

Live Search: GUN CONTROL AND OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD

AIN'T THAT RIGHT OCEAN SLEAZE THE TPA HAND SLAPPING TRUTH BANNING MODERATOR FROM LESBEAN CITY

GIVE MY REGARDS TO AREYOUFAKEWARPMINDREVWILLYALISTER FOR ME YA SILLY LITTLE FEMI-NOTSEE

__________________
If you don't KNOW where you come from...you WILL wind up going nowhere.

That goes for Ideas, institutions as well as individuals :-I

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUncnWxjUXM
^You CAN Handle The Truth - TRANCE Form America - 3of7

PSI TECH INVESTIGATIONS and LAW ENFORCEMENT

~777~

In your obvious disregard for what I am actually talking about...

There are responsible gun owners out there, I know many and they range from all political walks of life; there are many here in the South. Bottom line, you are another person who is very defensive when someone even mentions guns. I actually have no problem with you owning guns but you have a problem with me and my valuing diversity (which is different than allowing standards to drop, don't get mixed up here). The first person on this thread has zero tolerance for the diversity of opinions that are what makes up this country, the diversity and opinions that even your 2nd AMENDMENT RIGHTS are designed to protect. Bet you did not think of it that way, you don't consantly jump to 'but I have guns' to get your way. What about...'I have intellect, knowledge, and passion for what is right.' Founding fathers like Ben Franklin or Thomas Jefferson believed in this (as well as many others), guns don't make this country great (or the 2nd Amendement)---ideas do. I plan on living another 40+ years without having have owned a gun. I am not infringing upon your rights by doing this, and never said I would...but with the rhetoric and ideas presented first in the thread it infringes upon what is a pool of ideas that is the first and foremost thing that our forefathers want to protect. This has zero to do with guns...try to actually think about this, again, a Neaderthal approach and that is what would be the undoing of the country in the longrun.

Good post shadow . I agree 100%

__________________
American Politics and More the forum for smart people.

http://americanpoliticsandmore.com/forum/index.php

cat ''

The difference is some of us have been using our minds and really working for peaceful change for decades , speaking for myself .

I agree with shadow peaceful change does not look like its ever going to happen. The day is not too far away when people will start to say , enough is enough you cannot step on me anymore to the government and when that day comes its not going to be a day for the faint of heart.

__________________
American Politics and More the forum for smart people.

http://americanpoliticsandmore.com/forum/index.php

OK, tell me...what do they 'step on you' by doing? Be specific. This is part of my point.

OH HOW ABOUT BEATING UP LITTLE OLD LADIES FOR AN ANTIQUE HANGUN.....FAGGOT TEACHER :-(

The video you will see on this web site is horr... (more)
Added: March 07, 2007
The video you will see on this web site is horrifying. The crimes committed against law-abiding gun owners are beyond comprehension. The arrogance of anti-gun politicians and government officials and their hate of freedom will churn your stomach.

The law is the law, the Constitution is the Constitution. If ONE local mayor or police chief can decide what the Second Amendment means, it opens the door to tyranny—where ANY mayor or police chief can say what the Second Amendment means.

You've seen this brand of abuse of freedom in the history books—in the pages about days of gun confiscations leading to the terror of Stalin, Mao and Hitler. But you'd never in a million years think it could happen in America.
Well, it can and it did. And it will happen again unless we take action today.

New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin, Police Superintendent P. Eddie Compass unleashed a wave of confiscations with these chilling words:
"No one will be able to be armed. We will take all weapons. Only law enforcement will be allowed to have guns."

Thousands of firearms were then confiscated from law-abiding gun owners. The police gave no paperwork or receipts for those guns. They just stormed in and seized them.

With your help we're going to make the first time in New Orleans the LAST time in America. Thank you!

Now, one year later, these crimes against gun owners have snowballed into a far greater threat to our freedoms.
Even though NRA secured a court order demanding their immediate and unconditional return, almost every single confiscated firearm remains locked in government trailers.

With the stroke of a pen, Mayor Nagin and Police Superintendent Compass are getting away with "murder"—a savaging of the second, fourth and fourteenth amendments of our Constitution. And they have put America on notice that they're going to keep seizing lawfully owned guns under any pretense.

New Orleans gun owners are showing up at these trailers, with serial numbers of their firearms, expecting Mayor Nagin and his band of anti-gunners to respect the Federal courts.
They are met by stony-eyed bureaucrats who say serial numbers aren't enough—and that gun owners now need PROOF OF PURCHASE of these firearms.
How many of those gun owners do you think had original receipts for those firearms? And even if they did, how many do you think could find those receipts in the wreckage of a hurricane?
Many of these firearms were passed down from father to son, generation to generation. Some are precious heirlooms. Some are collector's pieces won in our wars. And they were all lawfully owned and they must be returned to their owners.
With your help we're going to make the first time in New Orleans the LAST time in America. Thank you!

YouTube - NRA: The Untold Story of Gun Confiscation After Katrina

FUCK YOU MOCKINGBIRD IGNORING CUNT SHIT

__________________
If you don't KNOW where you come from...you WILL wind up going nowhere.

That goes for Ideas, institutions as well as individuals :-I

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUncnWxjUXM
^You CAN Handle The Truth - TRANCE Form America - 3of7

PSI TECH INVESTIGATIONS and LAW ENFORCEMENT

~777~

Guns are useless. Give me a claymore any day of the week.

Just as women can never have too many pairs of shoes, men can never have too many guns. The statement that you don't need an automatic weapon to go deer hunting is totally bogus and is used only to cloud the issue. The 2nd Amendment has nothing to do with hunting, it concerns self defense, both from within and outside of our borders. To those who say I am safer in my house without a gun then with one I can only ask "are you so imcompetent that you are afraid you are going to mistake your pistol for your telephone and shoot yourself in the head while calling out for a pizza?" The average response time for the police to get to your home is 15 minutes or more. In 15 minutes you can be raped, murdered and your body disected and scattered. No thank you, I would rather worry about defending my self in court then in making funeral arrangements for my family.

BTW, I personally believe the best home defense weapon is a pump action 12 guage shotgun. The sound of chambering a round is enough to drive most intruders off, if you do have to shoot the oddball who won't run its a lot easier to him him with a shotgun and you are less likely to penetrate walls and hit someone hiding in another room. As backup however, I also have a snubnosed 38 Special I keep loaded with hollowpoints.

__________________
Its better to have fussed and crabbed then never to have fussed at all - Lucy

Here is the classic point.

Go back and look at the specific side the original thread was railing against...the left.

When the 'right' ran for the White House and took control of the government in 2000 they played on the sympathies of NRA gun owners and ranchers in places like Wyoming, the Dakotas, Montana, etc and of course promised to leave them alone. Shortly after the election those areas were opened up to a great deal of energy exploration through mineral rights (environmental laws got changed) and those same pro-NRA gun owners who voted for the right then were seeing their pristine ranches and open spaces being pock marked by drilling and trucks running back and forth. These people were furious (but they voted Bush and Cheney in).

Is this a liberals fault? Did a Democrat do this? Did Al Gore slap the face of gun owners and people in rural areas in the state of Wyoming after he was elected in? No, that was Dick Cheney. Did a liberal disregard the people in the Dakotas who protect thier lands with guns, etc? Did a liberal exploit minerals rights laws so friends in private industry can make a buck?

Fine, vote in someone who will protect your gun and you are voting in a person who wants something else from you...bump back to my last post. This point is explained clearly, has nothing to do with the sound of a round getting chambered. If a right wing Neocon wants the mineral rights under your land you have lost that battle, guns or not. There is your enemy of the American way, and the Supreme Court is making rulings that support this too---that is what you got with John Roberts getting appointed.

My point is that most people who sit right don't even know about the legislation and rulings that have favored lobbyists/CEOS and eroding your individual freedoms. This is not the 'left' or liberals doing this...go back to the original post.

So have have guns for what...to keep CEOS, Walmart, and Haliburton from getting inside your house?