"NASA's press office "marginalized or mischaracterized" studies on global warming between 2004 and 2006, the agency's own internal watchdog concluded.

In a report released Monday, NASA's inspector general office called it "inappropriate political interference" by political appointees in the press office. It said the agency's top management wasn't part of the censorship, nor were career officials"


Watchdog: NASA misled on global warming studies - CNN.com

__________________
Ephesians 5:15

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyR41JbpL_g

I am not sure you realize the Inspector General is criticizing political appointees of the Bush administration (many of whom were oil industry hacks) who tried to stifle peer reviewed science that was to be released.

Your article reveals how this adminstrations political appointees were allowed to stifle or even change scientists peer reviewed studies who were not trying to achieve any result ,but to find the truth. The oil hacks appointed by the Bush administration did not like the results of many of the peer reviewed scientific studies.

This article does not help support the cause you are promoting to ignore the worlds leading scientists and promote the oil industries promotion of ignoring science and using catch phrases like globaloney. You might try some oil industry journals to find articles to promote your cause. This article does the opposite.

I am afraid you are correct. It looks like Ocean breeze COMPLETELY misinterpreted the article....

__________________
The crows seemed to be calling his name, thought Caw.
- Jack Handy

Many of those oil executives (with no scientific background) appointed by the Bush administration were allowed to alter conclustions of peer reviewed studies that had no political agenda and the oil execs did not like the conclustions . Most of them are back in the oil industry as we speak.

Ya'll didn't think that obee actually read beyond the title, did you?

Whistleblower Reveals Bush Administration Altered Climate Change Reports

A former oil industry lobbyist changed language in government climate change reports to undermine the science on climate change and present it as less problematic, according to a government whistleblower, in what is becoming a persistent problem of politics trumping science.

The whistleblower, Rick Piltz, accused Philip Cooney of changing several 2002 and 2003 reports, including Out Changing Planet and the Strategic Plan for the United States Climate Change Science Program that discussed climate change. He asserts Cooney made changes focused on creating an air of doubt around climate change science. One of the changes Cooney made was crossing out a section on ice and snowpack melting, noting that it strayed "from research strategy into speculative findings/musings."

Before joining the White House Council on Environmental Quality as chief of staff, Cooney was a lobbyist for the largest oil industry trade group -- the American Petroleum Institute. He is trained as a lawyer, not a scientist. Cooney's changes echo the beliefs of the institute, whose website states, "U.S. oil and natural gas companies believe that uncertainties about climate change make it hard to justify mandatory, severe, near-term emission reductions."

Piltz, a Senior Associate with the U.S. Climate Change Science Policy Office and former Associate Director of the U.S. Global Change Research Program, resigned from the Climate Change Science Program in March in protest of the politicization of his science program. He noted in a memorandum sent to climate change officials last week, "I have not seen a situation like the one that has developed under this administration during the past four years, in which politicization by the White House has fed back directly into the science program in such a way as to undermine the credibility and integrity of the program."


This is not the first time the White House has altered reports on climate change. The Bush administration has also repeatedly shown resistance to embracing the scientific community's consensus that global warming is occurring, and oppose mandatory regulations aimed at curbing the release of greenhouse gases. As previously reported by OMB Watch, administration officials cut out an entire chapter on climate change within EPA's 2003 Draft Report on the Environment. In this case, CEQ requested changes such as the removal of any reference to National Academy of Sciences (NAS) findings which confirmed the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report asserting that climate change is happening, and humans are altering the atmosphere. This is particularly ironic, given that the White House requested the NAS report, but was unhappy with its findings. The administration also inserted a reference to a discredited study from the American Petroleum Institute.


© 2008 OMB Watch
1742 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20009
202-234-8494 (phone)
202-234-8584 (fax)

Combined Federal Campaign #10201

Please credit OMB Watch when redistributing this material.

"Our government's response to global warming must be based on science, and the Bush administration's manipulation of that information violates the public trust," said Sen. Frank R. Lautenberg, D-New Jersey.

Why is a Democrat politician making these accusations of political posturing and provides no evidence? Lautenberg is politically posturing, accusing the Bush Adm. of doing the same and has provided no evidence. LOL

Democrats will do anything to sell a hoax for profits!

__________________
The United States of Indentured Servants

Let me get this straight. Only republicans are oil hacks? Interesting concept.

__________________
Ephesians 5:15

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyR41JbpL_g