Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > Specific Political Issues > Environmental Issues

test
View Poll Results: What should be the new name of this category??
Bigfoot 1 11.11%
Democrat Scams and Frauds 2 22.22%
Climate Fear Mongering 4 44.44%
Liberal Tree Hugging Myths 2 22.22%
Democrat Religions 2 22.22%
Loch Ness Monster 1 11.11%
Liberal Scare Tactics 2 22.22%
Reserved for Future Liberal Scams 2 22.22%
Hippy Fundraising and Brainwashing 2 22.22%
AlGore's Retirement Fund 7 77.78%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2008, 08:02 PM
Badmutha's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,570
Default Rename this Category??--Vote Now

Just as we somehow survived global cooling......just as we managed to suvive the doomsday of Ocean Pollution.....it is now evident we will survive Man Made Global Warming.

Call Global Warming what you will.....a myth/liberal scam/money grab/religion.....no matter what you call it....there is still one vital question to be asked................

What are we going to do with this category??

Take a moment and vote in the poll....even you democrats in FL and MI....let the people decide. Or feel free to add your own......

Poll Preview
What should be the new name of the current Global Warming category?
  • Bigfoot
  • Democrat Scams and Frauds
  • Climate Fear Mongering
  • Liberal Tree Hugging Myths
  • Democrat Religions
  • Loch Ness Monster
  • Liberal Scare Tactics
  • Reserved for Future Liberal Scams
  • Hippy Fundraising and Brainwashing
  • AlGore's Retirement Fund

When they tried Global Cooling.......the earth began to warm.

THen they tried Global Warming.....the earth began to cool.

The tree hugging liberal solution....Climate Change....its coming soon.....to a climate near you....and yes.........its going to KILL US ALL!!!
__________________
AWE Super Referee 1) Similar to Democrat Super Delegates, my powers and my opinions are ten times more important than those of standard commoner referees... peasants 2) So powerful....the Refereed Debate category cannot contain me 3) I make my own rules...which you will follow 4) Get out of line and I will toss you in with the Duck
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2008, 10:36 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Washington state
Posts: 3,382
Default

How about a 'Bought and Paid For AGW Deniers' category. You could even have a poll guessing at which skeptic got paid off the most by Exxon Mobil. Or we could do a little research, post the money they have received, and have a poll asking which bought "scientist" (many of them lack proper credentials) provided Exxon the most bang for their buck.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-27-2008, 09:50 PM
Badmutha's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,570
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Upton View Post
How about a 'Bought and Paid For AGW Deniers' category. You could even have a poll guessing at which skeptic got paid off the most by Exxon Mobil. Or we could do a little research, post the money they have received, and have a poll asking which bought "scientist" (many of them lack proper credentials) provided Exxon the most bang for their buck.
Upton we have been through this before....there are many....many reputable distinguished scientists that disagree with man-made global warming....did evil big oil buy them all??

Exxon might be raking in huge profits.....but so are the scientists/enviromental groups/head shops/Tree huggers/AlGore...ect. ect.

It seems Global Warming is quite a big business....I wonder how many scientists they are buying....

Scientists dont get grants or funding for telling us everything is ok.....but my how the money rolls in when were all going to die.
__________________
AWE Super Referee 1) Similar to Democrat Super Delegates, my powers and my opinions are ten times more important than those of standard commoner referees... peasants 2) So powerful....the Refereed Debate category cannot contain me 3) I make my own rules...which you will follow 4) Get out of line and I will toss you in with the Duck
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-27-2008, 09:53 PM
crowonapost's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 9,975
Default

It's a bunch of bull. Percentage wise scientist are not making hardly anything off of Global warming.

Especially in comparison to the Oil industry. It's such a bad comparison the only response is to laugh.

As far as scientist getting grant money, they are by far getting a hell of a lot more money from the pharmaceutical industry than from ANY studies of global warming.
__________________
The crows seemed to be calling his name, thought Caw.
- Jack Handy
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-27-2008, 10:06 PM
mulp's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Merrimack, NH
Posts: 3,851
Default

How about "conservatives are too inarticulate to provide a convincing argument"?

Or perhaps, "conservatives are too lazy to actually do scientific research to prove that man has zero effect on the climate"?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-28-2008, 06:44 PM
Badmutha's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,570
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crowonapost View Post
It's a bunch of bull. Percentage wise scientist are not making hardly anything off of Global warming."
....now you know better than that Crow....unless you tell me greed is only present in Evil Big Oil....Scientists have to eat.....and they have been eating well

Quote:
Especially in comparison to the Oil industry. It's such a bad comparison the only response is to laugh.

As far as scientist getting grant money, they are by far getting a hell of a lot more money from the pharmaceutical industry than from ANY studies of global warming.
Regardless...they do get grant money...and other funding.....and if global warming is ever proven to be the hoax that it is.....the business that is Global Warming is going to come crashing down....just like Global Cooling.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mulp View Post
How about "conservatives are too inarticulate to provide a convincing argument"?

Or perhaps, "conservatives are too lazy to actually do scientific research to prove that man has zero effect on the climate"?
Well we can't really "Prove" that can we Mulp??....for the world is still waiting for the research that PROVES man has caused the earth to warm ONE WORLD ENDING DEGREE.

The whole premis of Global warming is that CO2 causes temperatures to rise......there is no scientific data that proves this. And without the help of the CO2 boogeyman....the ENTIRE argument and religion falls apart.

And if you can prove otherwise....then of course you must prove that global warming is detrimental to our planet....another unproven theory

Im not saying man-made global warming is an impossibility.....but I havent seen it yet.....its like Bigfoot.
__________________
AWE Super Referee 1) Similar to Democrat Super Delegates, my powers and my opinions are ten times more important than those of standard commoner referees... peasants 2) So powerful....the Refereed Debate category cannot contain me 3) I make my own rules...which you will follow 4) Get out of line and I will toss you in with the Duck
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-28-2008, 10:06 PM
smart makes a comeback's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Uptown Chicago and the Green Mill on a regular basis
Posts: 2,068
Default

Some suggested new names for this thread

"The eath is flat"
"Gravity is a myth"
"I want my tin foil hat"
"Don't you get it ? Al Gore is just too smart for me"
"I kiss Rush's nutsack"
"What global warmning ? it was 45 degrees last night"
" Only shitbirds finished high school"
" Come laugh at the knuckle draggers"

By the way...my Challange still stands

PRODUCE ONE SINGLE OPINON BY A NON BIAS EXPERT CLAIMING THAT THERE IS NO MAN MADE CONNECTION TO CLIMATE CHANGE, WHO IS NOT AN OILCOMPANY/ UTILITY COMPANY LOBBYIST, A RIGHT WING ZEALOT, CONNECTED TO A RIGHT WING OR LIBERTARIAN THINK TANK, OR WHO HAS NOT BEEN DEBUNKED OR DISCREDITED

Going on six months now..NO ONE has meet the challange
__________________
Argue with some..IGNORE the stupid

Yeah it hurts, you have been fucked by an Elephant !

"Happamia, sanoi kettu pihlajanmarjoista kun ei niihin yltänyt" ("Sour, said the fox about rowan berries, being unable to reach them"
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-28-2008, 10:26 PM
Badmutha's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,570
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smart makes a comeback View Post
By the way...my Challange still stands

PRODUCE ONE SINGLE OPINON BY A NON BIAS EXPERT CLAIMING THAT THERE IS NO MAN MADE CONNECTION TO CLIMATE CHANGE, WHO IS NOT AN OILCOMPANY/ UTILITY COMPANY LOBBYIST, A RIGHT WING ZEALOT, CONNECTED TO A RIGHT WING OR LIBERTARIAN THINK TANK, OR WHO HAS NOT BEEN DEBUNKED OR DISCREDITED

Going on six months now..NO ONE has meet the challange
Im ready to meet the "challange"..........here is 400......let me know when you have discredited the first 100 and we can talk.

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.c...y.SenateReport

Quote:
Over 400 prominent scientists from more than two dozen countries recently voiced significant objections to major aspects of the so-called "consensus" on man-made global warming. These scientists, many of whom are current and former participants in the UN IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), criticized the climate claims made by the UN IPCC and former Vice President Al Gore.

The new report issued by the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee's office of the GOP Ranking Member details the views of the scientists, the overwhelming majority of whom spoke out in 2007.

Even some in the establishment media now appear to be taking notice of the growing number of skeptical scientists. In October, the Washington Post Staff Writer Juliet Eilperin conceded the obvious, writing that climate skeptics "appear to be expanding rather than shrinking." Many scientists from around the world have dubbed 2007 as the year man-made global warming fears "bite the dust." (LINK) In addition, many scientists who are also progressive environmentalists believe climate fear promotion has "co-opted" the green movement. (LINK)

This blockbuster Senate report lists the scientists by name, country of residence, and academic/institutional affiliation. It also features their own words, biographies, and weblinks to their peer reviewed studies and original source materials as gathered from public statements, various news outlets, and websites in 2007. This new "consensus busters" report is poised to redefine the debate.

Many of the scientists featured in this report consistently stated that numerous colleagues shared their views, but they will not speak out publicly for fear of retribution.
(dick-Smacs "Challange")
RIP
5/28/08 11:26 PM
__________________
AWE Super Referee 1) Similar to Democrat Super Delegates, my powers and my opinions are ten times more important than those of standard commoner referees... peasants 2) So powerful....the Refereed Debate category cannot contain me 3) I make my own rules...which you will follow 4) Get out of line and I will toss you in with the Duck
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2008, 04:47 PM
smart makes a comeback's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Uptown Chicago and the Green Mill on a regular basis
Posts: 2,068
Default

Quote:
View Post Yesterday, 10:26 PM
Remove user from ignore listBadmutha
This message is hidden because Badmutha is on your ignore list.
Or how about

GoArmy.com

"Faggot chickenhawk pussies"

Quote:
View Post Yesterday, 10:26 PM
Remove user from ignore listBadmutha
This message is hidden because Badmutha is on your ignore list.
enlist yet...cunt ?
__________________
Argue with some..IGNORE the stupid

Yeah it hurts, you have been fucked by an Elephant !

"Happamia, sanoi kettu pihlajanmarjoista kun ei niihin yltänyt" ("Sour, said the fox about rowan berries, being unable to reach them"
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2008, 06:13 PM
PaleRider's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,328
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smart makes a comeback View Post
Or how about

GoArmy.com

"Faggot chickenhawk pussies"



enlist yet...cunt ?
I don't see you discrediting even the first 10 of those scientists, much less the first 100. It will be interesting to see if you continue with your mewling, idiotic challenge now that it has been met.
__________________
"It's not alive, It's not alive, It's not alive. Because I said it isnt', there's your proof jerk." ...lexi

"As far as your logical fallicy shit - shove it. I am a woman."...naturemomma
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


» Navigation

Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!


test

$5 monthly donation:

$10 monthly donation:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Poltical Topsites PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings