Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > Specific Political Issues > Global Warming
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2008, 06:17 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 10,491
Default

If you've never heard the term Climate Change before, peer-reviewed papers are something you'd have no use for, OBee.
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2008, 06:19 PM
oceanbreeze's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: everywhere
Posts: 14,197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by A. Crowley View Post
If you've never heard the term Climate Change before, peer-reviewed papers are something you'd have no use for, OBee.
I have heard of it. But I enjoy saying GLOBALONEY too much.
__________________
honor the fallen; http://www.militarycity.com/valor/honor.html
Iraq body count http://www.iraqbodycount.org/
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2008, 06:23 PM
oceanbreeze's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: everywhere
Posts: 14,197
Default

Here we go, hot off the presses, can't seem to make up their minds.

Cleaner air to worsen droughts in Amazon: study
__________________
honor the fallen; http://www.militarycity.com/valor/honor.html
Iraq body count http://www.iraqbodycount.org/
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2008, 06:30 PM
wow's Avatar
wow wow is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 4,409
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by A. Crowley View Post
LMFOO!


Even Dubya admits that Climate Change is reality.


Goddamn, but you people are stupid.




HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH! !!!!!!!!!!!
When was the climate always the same?
__________________
Drill offshore now
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2008, 09:20 PM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,962
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oceanbreeze View Post
Sam; if you're a scientist you know that the scientific community changes it's mind constantly .
I have a science degree , but do not consider myself a scientist. I used it only to enter the healthcare field, although I do understand scientific method and the importance of repeated peer review studies for years to come to a theory. The science community is not one person OB who changes their mind like a little girl. It is a community of thousands (most reputable,some not so reputable) and for any hypothesis to become a theory it takes years and thousands of studies that compare both natural impacts to global temperatures to man made causes.

You used a few examples of recommendations of nutrition changing as proof that all scientific theories will always be wrong. Your examples were not scientific theories, only hypothesis about nutrition. That comparison was illogical. Even posters who do not believe that humans cause CC would not sound so silly. A simple study on something like a nutritional recommendation is far different than a scientific theory developed over years and based on peer reviewed studies and scientific method.

Quote:
Originally Posted by oceanbreeze View Post
If you think I care that you are being condescending, guess again, I don't. I know the fallacy of globaloney.
Then why are you using fallacies for your position? You could defend an opposing position on CC and I would listen, but you have not used any logic in doing so. I think it is more condescending that most posters just respond with one liners or skim what you write and not even make a serious response to you. I was trying to take you seriously and let you explain with evidence why the IPCC consensus is wrong, how much Gore has profited from his CC work and what he has done that is as evil as Westboro inbreds to inspire hatred from you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by oceanbreeze View Post
I know you say you travel abroad, but in Oregon, where my sister lives, there's a political agenda. They are liberals, but they also grow tire of it. Simple things, use paper bags, don't use paper bags it cost just as much to transport them. So what's worse the emissions or the plastics? .
So because your sister is a liberal and lives in Oregon and is frustrated that a store has tried to find the best solution and possibly researched and changed their minds about their grocery bags--that is your proof this is a political agenda and a scientific theory is wrong?

There is no doubt in my mind that there will be someone who will profit unfairly off of every problem facing humanity including environmental problems--that does not conclude those problems are not in existence. People will profit fraudulently off of terrorism, medical issues, prevention of crime...do we throw our hands in the air and say lets give up and not treat disease or have a military or police force? Of course not--Americans are far more intelligent than that. We know that although a few always try to scam us we will still try to solve problems facing humanity..terror, crime, disease and protecting for our environment is also important to protect human health. Not at the expense of everything else, but we are smart and innovative enough to work on more then one problem and contend with those who might scam us.
Quote:
Originally Posted by oceanbreeze View Post
BTW: nice distraction with the Alex Jones retort. What was that biased scientific study/agency you used to quote from?.
Well on this thread I asked you to defend your position so I used no report--I do not need a report to understand the difference between scientific hypothesis,theories and laws--on all the CC threads I used NASA graphs, IPCC scientists studies, and verified data. I explain scientific laws that pertain to the theory and have always said that the consensus and the studies show it is very likely and in the most remote possibility they are wrong we still need to move to alternative fuels and protect our air and water for many reasons including economic, security and geo-political. Badmutha and PR are skeptics ,yet make solid arguments and are logical.

You were the one who used a source that was a layman who used no science and misquoted Gore in his title....he was so lame that Alex Jones featured him. That was your distraction --not mine. Sean Hannity has him on as a guest if you like him so much.

OB I take positions on different topics . If I take a strong stand I am willing to support my position. It is okay that you do not like to do this , but this is a debate forum . Your expressed emotion of hate and comparisons to Westboro Baptist that caught my attention and I thought you might want to discuss it. Look at my first response to you--you were the one who became flippant . If you tried to discuss war veterans issues with me and I flipped you off with nothing more than they are just Iraqbaloney stealing my tax dolars--that would be condescending and make me look stupid...yet that is how you respond to others.

I am challenged almost everytime I post on a topic to defend my position.

Most never even respond to you unless it is with a joke. I thought from your emotional tone you might want to defend your position. I can see I was wrong and clearly just unscientific opinion pieces and bumper sticker phrases is your style then that is okay with me....you refute yourself with that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by oceanbreeze View Post
Agreed, we used to live by a paper plant in Lawton, OK.

Anyway.....more from Jeff Poor

Report: Global Sea Ice at 'Unprecedented' Levels

So, what makes you regard Jeff Poor over thousands of scientists from the IPCC ,WMO and NASA? He is a media right hack used by Alex Jones, Sean Hannity and WND and MRG? yet, you trust him over all others because he writes tells you want to hear and uses 15 line catch phrases that you like.

Quote:
Originally Posted by oceanbreeze View Post
I have heard of it. But I enjoy saying GLOBALONEY too much.
I am sure you do, but it makes you look foolish. Those who are skeptical and able to use logic do not look foolish if they are inquisitive and questioning and logical.

Invading iraq was proven to be a scam--do you like to refer to those who have suffered the consequences as Iraqbaloney?

Anyway, I will let you have the last word here and leave you to your balonies.
Reply With Quote
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2008, 09:30 PM
oceanbreeze's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: everywhere
Posts: 14,197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam View Post
I have a science degree , but do not consider myself a scientist. I used it only to enter the healthcare field, although I do understand scientific method and the importance of repeated peer review studies for years to come to a theory. The science community is not one person OB who changes their mind like a little girl. It is a community of thousands (most reputable,some not so reputable) and for any hypothesis to become a theory it takes years and thousands of studies that compare both natural impacts to global temperatures to man made causes.

You used a few examples of recommendations of nutrition changing as proof that all scientific theories will always be wrong. Your examples were not scientific theories, only hypothesis about nutrition. That comparison was illogical. Even posters who do not believe that humans cause CC would not sound so silly. A simple study on something like a nutritional recommendation is far different than a scientific theory developed over years and based on peer reviewed studies and scientific method.

Then why are you using fallacies for your position? You could defend an opposing position on CC and I would listen, but you have not used any logic in doing so. I think it is more condescending that most posters just respond with one liners or skim what you write and not even make a serious response to you. I was trying to take you seriously and let you explain with evidence why the IPCC consensus is wrong, how much Gore has profited from his CC work and what he has done that is as evil as Westboro inbreds to inspire hatred from you.


So because your sister is a liberal and lives in Oregon and is frustrated that a store has tried to find the best solution and possibly researched and changed their minds about their grocery bags--that is your proof this is a political agenda and a scientific theory is wrong?

There is no doubt in my mind that there will be someone who will profit unfairly off of every problem facing humanity including environmental problems--that does not conclude those problems are not in existence. People will profit fraudulently off of terrorism, medical issues, prevention of crime...do we throw our hands in the air and say lets give up and not treat disease or have a military or police force? Of course not--Americans are far more intelligent than that. We know that although a few always try to scam us we will still try to solve problems facing humanity..terror, crime, disease and protecting for our environment is also important to protect human health. Not at the expense of everything else, but we are smart and innovative enough to work on more then one problem and contend with those who might scam us.
Well on this thread I asked you to defend your position so I used no report--I do not need a report to understand the difference between scientific hypothesis,theories and laws--on all the CC threads I used NASA graphs, IPCC scientists studies, and verified data. I explain scientific laws that pertain to the theory and have always said that the consensus and the studies show it is very likely and in the most remote possibility they are wrong we still need to move to alternative fuels and protect our air and water for many reasons including economic, security and geo-political. Badmutha and PR are skeptics ,yet make solid arguments and are logical.

You were the one who used a source that was a layman who used no science and misquoted Gore in his title....he was so lame that Alex Jones featured him. That was your distraction --not mine. Sean Hannity has him on as a guest if you like him so much.

OB I take positions on different topics . If I take a strong stand I am willing to support my position. It is okay that you do not like to do this , but this is a debate forum . Your expressed emotion of hate and comparisons to Westboro Baptist that caught my attention and I thought you might want to discuss it. Look at my first response to you--you were the one who became flippant . If you tried to discuss war veterans issues with me and I flipped you off with nothing more than they are just Iraqbaloney stealing my tax dolars--that would be condescending and make me look stupid...yet that is how you respond to others.

I am challenged almost everytime I post on a topic to defend my position.

Most never even respond to you unless it is with a joke. I thought from your emotional tone you might want to defend your position. I can see I was wrong and clearly just unscientific opinion pieces and bumper sticker phrases is your style then that is okay with me....you refute yourself with that.




So, what makes you regard Jeff Poor over thousands of scientists from the IPCC ,WMO and NASA? He is a media right hack used by Alex Jones, Sean Hannity and WND and MRG? yet, you trust him over all others because he writes tells you want to hear and uses 15 line catch phrases that you like.


I am sure you do, but it makes you look foolish. Those who are skeptical and able to use logic do not look foolish if they are inquisitive and questioning and logical.

Invading iraq was proven to be a scam--do you like to refer to those who have suffered the consequences as Iraqbaloney?

Anyway, I will let you have the last word here and leave you to your balonies.
Sam; it's capitalism and politics at it's finest, anyone and everyone can be bought out. It's all man-made, how did man make the recent volcano errupt and cause more toxin to the air than man could ever do with emissions? Al Gore did blame "global warming" on the cyclone. It's nature, it's not all man-made. Al Gore invented the climate as much as he invented the internet.

Sam; I'm sorry, but I do have relatives that are in scientific community that also believe it's complete hogwash. Sorry, but aren't buying swamp land in FL, no matter how condescening or how you sugar coat it.

Why don't you debate with coyote? Or is it because you think he's a paid poster to sway people against believing in global warming?
__________________
honor the fallen; http://www.militarycity.com/valor/honor.html
Iraq body count http://www.iraqbodycount.org/

Last edited by oceanbreeze : 05-07-2008 at 09:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 05-08-2008, 03:50 PM
smart makes a comeback's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Uptown Chicago and the Green Mill on a regular basis
Posts: 1,655
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by A. Crowley View Post
If you've never heard the term Climate Change before, peer-reviewed papers are something you'd have no use for, OBee.
There is no need to discuss sciencewith the flat earth / Gravity is a myth nut jobs.
They are kooks, whackos and tin foil hat paranoids.....dont bother
__________________
Argue with some..IGNORE the stupid

Yeah it hurts, you have been fucked by an Elephant !

"Happamia, sanoi kettu pihlajanmarjoista kun ei niihin yltänyt" ("Sour, said the fox about rowan berries, being unable to reach them"
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 05-08-2008, 08:59 PM
Political Novice
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oceanbreeze View Post
I hate the fact that he exploits others for his own personal gain and benefit. When is going to come on and say "the volcanos are erupting because of globaloney" too? Darn right I hate the man, he's the eptiomy of capitalism
Fortunately, capitalism will be the way Al Gore's crap is overcome. It is academia and the mass of fools who believe in AL's earthology not capitalist. You confuse capitalist ie the shop owner with the tarrot fortune teller. Capitalist produce a necessary and desired commodity not BS.
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 06:06 PM
sovereign_eagle2's Avatar
Political Novice
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by A. Crowley View Post
LMFOO!


Even Dubya admits that Climate Change is reality.


Goddamn, but you people are stupid.




HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH! !!!!!!!!!!!
Even though Bush has recognized global warming as "climate change", putting a slight spin on the term, no policy change has accompanied this. In fact, Bush has not put any regulation of greenhouse gases since he was elected in 2000.

A lot of you may not be a big fan of Al Gore, but is he seriously worse than his counterpart in the 2000 Presidential Election? I know it is difficult to compare the two situations; and it is also hard to predict what Gore would have done in office at the time, but my bet would be that he would have more than a 30% approval rating. We probably wouldn't be stuck in the middle of a religious war either.
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 11:07 PM
mulp's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Merrimack, NH
Posts: 2,483
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oceanbreeze View Post
He's such a bumbling idiot trying to make a profit and buck off of anything and everything. HE's fricking scum of the earth. He's getting as bad as those Westboro church freaks.

Al Gore Calls Myanmar Cyclone a 'Consequence' of Global Warming
I trust you will speak out in opposition to McCain: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/13/us...mccain.html?hp
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



» Navigation
Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Poltical Topsites PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings