Science is not based upon consensus. Clue!

__________________
THAT explains it!!!



Word of warning... I don't play well with others.

Tell us all about it, Professor.

Fucking dumbshits.

You need an education, not indoctrination.

__________________
THAT explains it!!!



Word of warning... I don't play well with others.

Fuck!
It's as if you pathetic dipshits just came to the table; full of Foxnews talking-points and ridiculous partisan hubris, but devoid of any facts...Yet try to take command.

There IS NO dissention in the scientific community on the issue of climate change!

You are IDIOTS!

You're so full of shit.

Here, I'll link just one for you...

UAH News: Your Official UAH News Source




You're a retard.

__________________
THAT explains it!!!



Word of warning... I don't play well with others.

Ten bucks say's you did not read more than a paragraph of that piece.

You mean they are scientists without reason to refute like Exxon Mobile hacks and random wannabes who received the letter as I did!
I agree you would like to think this would be so , but as we know people will start wars for sheer greed-why would they be willing to consider science that will happen slowly with only a window of opportunity.

Bad the evidence is overwhelming and clear that man made emissions are impacting our climate-slowly it will happen and it already is ...yes greed can close some peoples eyes as it did many in this administration who now suddenly recognize the impact of man made emissions on climate. Not all whose finances will be impacted are so greedy..for instance Shell Oil CEO knows the debate is over and change must be begin..


You have said nothing here. If you think we are fighting over oil-just wait until we are fighting over water-and it is already beginning.

The overwhelming consensus of the scientific community (i.e., those who are actively engaged in climate research, publish their results in peer-reviewed journals, and allow their conclusions to be tested by others) is that the global warming that is happening is mostly human-caused by the burning of fossil fuels. There is disconnect between the scientists and the uneducated general public. The political media is usually interested in fanning the flames of controversy instead of educating the public. Therefore, they will look for opponents of the scientific consensus to provide a "balanced view" and give equal credence to the global warming skeptics( see above lin of the lack of credibility on these "scientists" geez I could have been one of them! The voices of the few (unqualified) are magnified to be equal to the voices of the many. Sad huh?

Hey Bad- Do you understand the water impact of a few degrees?

U.S. and Global Water Wars Loom | LiveScience

Are you keeping updated on the climate research at the The Ohio State University-they are about more then just football...


The scientists released a 67-page chapter on North American climate effects, which is part of an international report on climate change impact.

Meanwhile, global-warming water problems will make poor, unstable parts of the world -- the Middle East, Africa and South Asia -- even more prone to wars, terrorism and the need for international intervention, a panel of retired military leaders said in a separate report.

"Water at large is the central (global warming) problem for the U.S.,'' Princeton University geosciences professor Michael Oppenheimer said after a press conference featuring eight American scientists who were lead authors of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's climate-effects report.

Roger Pulwarty, one of the federal government's top drought scientists, said states such as Arizona and Colorado, which already fight over the Colorado River basin water, will step up legal skirmishes. They may look to the Great Lakes, but water availability there will shrink, he said.

Especially, since, not only did it not support his argument but that of man made emissions as a cause for global warming, it had no comprehension of ocean currents and the arctic impact. What a joke.