Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > Specific Political Issues > Environmental Issues

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2007, 09:34 AM
Smitty0311's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,887
Default The Cost Of Global Warming Legeslation

Global Warming Bill Could Cost Every U.S. Man, Woman and Child Up to $494 Annually

WaTimes Warns Climate Change Bill Has a Cost: $494 a Year for Every U.S. Man, Woman and Child

By Jeff Poor | November 13, 2007 - 17:39 ET
What's another $500 taken out of your paycheck over the course of a year? It probably isn't much to global warming alarmists like Al Gore, but that's what it could cost you if legislation pending in the U.S. Senate is passed into law.

Does that $500 have your attention? Well, multiply that times every member of your immediate family.

According to a November 11 Washington Times editorial, a bill introduced in the Senate by Sens. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) and John Warner (R-Va.) that would require companies to scale back greenhouse-gas emissions could cost Americans $4 trillion to $6 trillion over the next 40 years.

If that bill were passed and made law, the tax would cost every man, woman and child - more than 303 million Americans - $494 a year, a significant burden on the U.S. economy.

If you're not yet skeptical of this global warming initiative, listen to former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, who warns the effects of carbon caps would be limited unless imposed globally. He said in his book, "The Age of Turbulence," that caps imposed only on the United States could be detrimental.

"There is no effective way to meaningfully reduce emissions without negatively impacting a large part of an economy," Greenspan wrote. "Net, it is a tax. If the cap is low enough to make a meaningful inroad into CO2 emissions, permits will become expensive and large numbers of companies will experience cost increases that make them less competitive. Jobs will be lost and real incomes of workers constrained."
__________________
"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they've made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem." Ronald Reagan http://www.arguewitheveryone.com/war...bout-iraq.html
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2007, 05:01 PM
Mister Mxyzptlk's Avatar
Seasoned Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 51
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smitty0311 View Post
WaTimes Warns Climate Change Bill Has a Cost: $494 a Year for Every U.S. Man, Woman and Child
I can believe it. You know those "Energy Efficient Fluorescent" bulbs they sell all over, the ones that screw into a normal socket. They cost ten times as much as normal bulbs and here at my house they last half as long as the good old incandescents. Sure they save me a few pennies on the electric bill, but in no way does it make up for the cost of the bulbs.

We save money on the utility bill by keeping the thermostat set at 60 degrees and I pick up old pallets in my big van and burn them. Look at all the natural gas we are saving!
__________________
My soul was removed to make room for all this sarcasm...
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2007, 05:28 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Washington state
Posts: 2,952
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smitty0311 View Post

If that bill were passed and made law, the tax would cost every man, woman and child - more than 303 million Americans - $494 a year, a significant burden on the U.S. economy.


For the Iraq war , total economic costs were estimated at $1.3 trillion for the period from 2002 to 2008. That would cost a family of four $16,500, the report said. Now that's thats a REAL significant burden.

Last edited by Upton; 11-15-2007 at 05:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2007, 05:30 PM
coyote's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister Mxyzptlk View Post
I can believe it. You know those "Energy Efficient Fluorescent" bulbs they sell all over, the ones that screw into a normal socket. They cost ten times as much as normal bulbs and here at my house they last half as long as the good old incandescents. Sure they save me a few pennies on the electric bill, but in no way does it make up for the cost of the bulbs.

We save money on the utility bill by keeping the thermostat set at 60 degrees and I pick up old pallets in my big van and burn them. Look at all the natural gas we are saving!
Did you know the fluorescent bulbs are full of mercury? Don't break those things.
__________________
"If capitalism had never existed, any honest humanitarian should have been struggling to invent it. But when you see men struggling to evade its existence, to misrepresent its nature, and to destroy its last remnants - you may be sure that whatever their motives, love for man is not one of them." - Ayn Rand, Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal

Coyote Blog


New Law Trashes Genetic Science
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2007, 05:47 PM
ONEWHITEDUCK's Avatar
ONEWHITEDUCK
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 15,372
Lightbulb Even You Are Guilty Of Spreading Gloom And Doom

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smitty0311 View Post
Global Warming Bill Could Cost Every U.S. Man, Woman and Child Up to $494 Annually

WaTimes Warns Climate Change Bill Has a Cost: $494 a Year for Every U.S. Man, Woman and Child

By Jeff Poor | November 13, 2007 - 17:39 ET
What's another $500 taken out of your paycheck over the course of a year? It probably isn't much to global warming alarmists like Al Gore, but that's what it could cost you if legislation pending in the U.S. Senate is passed into law.

Does that $500 have your attention? Well, multiply that times every member of your immediate family.

According to a November 11 Washington Times editorial, a bill introduced in the Senate by Sens. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) and John Warner (R-Va.) that would require companies to scale back greenhouse-gas emissions could cost Americans $4 trillion to $6 trillion over the next 40 years.

If that bill were passed and made law, the tax would cost every man, woman and child - more than 303 million Americans - $494 a year, a significant burden on the U.S. economy.

If you're not yet skeptical of this global warming initiative, listen to former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, who warns the effects of carbon caps would be limited unless imposed globally. He said in his book, "The Age of Turbulence," that caps imposed only on the United States could be detrimental.

"There is no effective way to meaningfully reduce emissions without negatively impacting a large part of an economy," Greenspan wrote. "Net, it is a tax. If the cap is low enough to make a meaningful inroad into CO2 emissions, permits will become expensive and large numbers of companies will experience cost increases that make them less competitive. Jobs will be lost and real incomes of workers constrained."
IT'S NOT ABOUT MONEY SMITTY

IN THE END IT'S ABOUT GOD........not lightbulbs .

^I^
__________________
If you don't KNOW where you come from...you WILL wind up going nowhere.

That goes for Ideas, institutions as well as individuals :-I

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUncnWxjUXM

PSI TECH INVESTIGATIONS and LAW ENFORCEMENT
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2007, 11:19 PM
Mister Mxyzptlk's Avatar
Seasoned Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 51
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by coyote View Post
Did you know the fluorescent bulbs are full of mercury? Don't break those things.
Well, I usualy make a point of putting them in a bag of water, smash them carefully and then pour the contents out in the neighbors dog dish...

But that's just my method of disposal.
__________________
My soul was removed to make room for all this sarcasm...
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-16-2007, 04:40 PM
coyote's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Upton View Post
For the Iraq war , total economic costs were estimated at $1.3 trillion for the period from 2002 to 2008. That would cost a family of four $16,500, the report said. Now that's thats a REAL significant burden.
Are you saying:

1) Because we already wasted a significant amount of money on the war that it’s perfectly acceptable to waste more money on climate change

Or

2) Because we wasted so much money on the war it is all more reason not to waste money on climate change?
__________________
"If capitalism had never existed, any honest humanitarian should have been struggling to invent it. But when you see men struggling to evade its existence, to misrepresent its nature, and to destroy its last remnants - you may be sure that whatever their motives, love for man is not one of them." - Ayn Rand, Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal

Coyote Blog


New Law Trashes Genetic Science
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


» Navigation

Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!


$5 monthly donation:

$10 monthly donation:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Poltical Topsites PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings