Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > General Political Debate > General Political Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #311 (permalink)  
Old 07-12-2007, 09:47 PM
I_Hate_the_Nazi_Right's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,355
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I_Hate_the_Nazi_Right View Post
Show me where I said that... I said that the NEW DEAL WAS NOT SOCIALISM. Sorry, DOMMY, but "socialistic" doesn't cut it...
I believe it was you who used the phrase "Mixed Economy" earlier in the debate.
__________________
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

Benjamin Franklin

The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.

John Adams from the " Treaty of Tripoly, article 11
Reply With Quote
  #312 (permalink)  
Old 07-12-2007, 09:53 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,099
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I_Hate_the_Nazi_Right View Post
So FDR was suppose to make the Farmer give away his crops and livestock with NO PAYMENT... I thought you Neo's believed in Capitalism... again this instituition is EXACTLY what Roosevelt was try to save. The balance had to be regained...

Everyone knows that WWII ended the great depression, I have never contested this fact.
You said that FDR and his policies brought us out of the Depression. I understand why you are reversing course now since I asked you to point to specific policies that did this.

If people were going hungry then there would have been demand. The farmers would not have made as much money, but they would not have given it away. Capitalism would be letting the market determine the price.

Again, do you not recognize that you are saying that FDR artificially raised the prices despite telling me that I was wrong when I told you that? Funny. Now you are just trying to justify it. Fine, I agree he helped the large farmers out by doing this, but he also hurt the consumers who had no jbs and now their food prices just went up. You think that is OK. I don't. We disagree on that, but you did agree I was right and you were wrong about the artificial raising of prices.

Quote:
Originally Posted by I_Hate_the_Nazi_Right View Post
Show me where I said that... I said that the NEW DEAL WAS NOT SOCIALISM. Sorry, DOMMY, but "socialistic" doesn't cut it...
And I said there were aspects of socialism in the New Deal. Price controls are some.

Quote:
Originally Posted by I_Hate_the_Nazi_Right View Post
If you like I can give you a link to the speech so you can hear mr roosevelt explain it to your slow ass.
I can give you links to politicians saying a lot of things. Is that the new standard on what is true and what isn't?
Reply With Quote
  #313 (permalink)  
Old 07-12-2007, 09:54 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,099
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I_Hate_the_Nazi_Right View Post
I believe it was you who used the phrase "Mixed Economy" earlier in the debate.
Of course I did. We have a mixed economy even now. Do you have a point? Mixed economy would mean some socialism.
Reply With Quote
  #314 (permalink)  
Old 07-12-2007, 09:57 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,099
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom1 View Post
Tell me what question and if you have asked it I will most likely be able to point to the place that I already answered it.

You were wrong about Hoover and his policies. I pointed to specific legislation which was the same and can do some more but you wouldn't understand. You are too dense to even realize that I am criticizing Hoover for too much intervention. Some of the policies were good, others were not good.

You also haven't shown the proof that the AAA was meant to force farmers to adopt crop rotation rather than artificially increase agricultural prices. Please tell me how killing off millions of livestock during a food shortage has anything to do with crop rotation.
I pointed out the similar policies. So you were wrong on the first one.

You now admit that FDR DID artificially raise the agricultural prices. Wrong again.

You aren't doing very well.
Reply With Quote
  #315 (permalink)  
Old 07-12-2007, 09:59 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,099
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I_Hate_the_Nazi_Right View Post
Is socialistic the same as socialism? My point was that FDR did insert socialism as a new form of goverment. Just because you are tall and have good hair doesn't mean you're George Clooney.
I wouldn't go that far Nazi, but I will say there was a lot of socialism in his plan. Some socialistic policies are needed though.
Reply With Quote
  #316 (permalink)  
Old 07-12-2007, 09:59 PM
I_Hate_the_Nazi_Right's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,355
Default

Then Dom... explain to me why there wasn't any demand. I've already explained to you but you keep failing to listen.

YES I DO BELIEVE THAT THE POLICIES OF FDR BROUGHT US OUT OF THE DEPRESSION. His use of the government to "sustain" the country and his obvious desire to enter to the war (which was no small matter) all lead to the country regaining it's and renewing it's "balance" of Capitalism as creature, a creature that must be controled.

Admit it, FDR saved capitalism while being hailed as the socialist president of the 20th century. Oh, and just because there were aspect of his policies that reflect socialist practices doesn't make it socialism. That is all I said and you don't seem to be able to find anything to refute that.
__________________
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

Benjamin Franklin

The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.

John Adams from the " Treaty of Tripoly, article 11
Reply With Quote
  #317 (permalink)  
Old 07-12-2007, 10:09 PM
I_Hate_the_Nazi_Right's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,355
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom1 View Post
I pointed out the similar policies. So you were wrong on the first one.

You now admit that FDR DID artificially raise the agricultural prices. Wrong again.

You aren't doing very well.

Who gives a shit about Hoover, you brought him up to deflect and his plans for fixing the great depression WERE VERY DIFFERENT than FDR's... you know how I know that? FDR BEAT HIS FUCKING ASS... admit that. If you don't I'll post the proof again that you fail constantly to comment on.

You began the farming sidebar about subsidies and I explained to you how farming works and why the system changed after wwi crash. FDR didn't artifically inflate prices, he returned to the point they were pre-war SO THAT THE FARMER COULD KEEP HIS LAND AND KEEP GROWING FOOD. When things get fucked up they have to fixed or for that matter REGULATED.

And you still won't admit that it was industrialist great and the completely topsided distribution of wealth that caused the depression in the first place.

So you break it down for you... because you are slow.

Good Guys = IHTNR and FDR
Bad Guys = Dom and the Greedy Capitalists who collapsed the system.


Watching the news tonight and seeing the DOW hit a new record in our shacky economy gives me chills when I think of the similarities between their time and ours.
Bad Guys -
__________________
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

Benjamin Franklin

The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.

John Adams from the " Treaty of Tripoly, article 11
Reply With Quote
  #318 (permalink)  
Old 07-12-2007, 10:09 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,099
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I_Hate_the_Nazi_Right View Post
Then Dom... explain to me why there wasn't any demand. I've already explained to you but you keep failing to listen.

YES I DO BELIEVE THAT THE POLICIES OF FDR BROUGHT US OUT OF THE DEPRESSION. His use of the government to "sustain" the country and his obvious desire to enter to the war (which was no small matter) all lead to the country regaining it's and renewing it's "balance" of Capitalism as creature, a creature that must be controled.

Admit it, FDR saved capitalism while being hailed as the socialist president of the 20th century. Oh, and just because there were aspect of his policies that reflect socialist practices doesn't make it socialism. That is all I said and you don't seem to be able to find anything to refute that.

There was demand for food. There were food shortages. Farmers didn't want to supply the food at those prices so FDR artificially raised the prices. You agree with me. What is the problem? You already admitted you were wrong so why keep admitting it?

You are now saying that it was FDR's policies which led us out of the Depression. Tell me which specific policies and how they lef us out of the Depression.

World War II got us out of the Depression. What FDR did (and Hoover started) was to support unions and create systems which would attempt to prevent something like this from happening again.

What is to refute? You are agreeing with me now. You are saying that he did implement socialistic policies.
Reply With Quote
  #319 (permalink)  
Old 07-12-2007, 10:16 PM
I_Hate_the_Nazi_Right's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,355
Default

Dom if there were shortages then crop and livestock prices should have been throught the roof.... fact is there was OVER STOCK, how much proof of this do you need.

No dom I'm not agree with you... You want me to say that FDR was socialist and I don't believe was... you are using the word socialistic and I'm talking socialism... FDR DID NOT INSTITUTE SOCIALISM This has been my point all along and that is the only point I'll make.

You can try to put words in my mouth but it isn't going to work...

Now answer the question asshole... Did FDR save Capitalism?
__________________
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

Benjamin Franklin

The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.

John Adams from the " Treaty of Tripoly, article 11
Reply With Quote
  #320 (permalink)  
Old 07-12-2007, 10:17 PM
I_Hate_the_Nazi_Right's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,355
Default

And for that matter does Capitalism need to be controlled or does "free market" dictate policy?
__________________
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

Benjamin Franklin

The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.

John Adams from the " Treaty of Tripoly, article 11
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


» Navigation

Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!


$5 monthly donation:

$10 monthly donation:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0