Thread: Is Global Warming the libs' WMDs?

So if all you have is an email and Scientists in over 130 countries have actual data, who is the asshole again?

Originally Posted by BushFuckingSucksDick

Even National Geographic has the nerve to enhance the lie through their analysis. See all the lies and more here:

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...rctic-ice.html

Here's what I mean. That article even starts out by saying "according to a new study of the effects of global warming on sea ice".

If the effects of greenhouse gases on our ozone layer were overstated, like in the case of the scientist who manipulated data, then the rest of this study is thrown off by initial faulty data.

Originally Posted by LCOF

http://biggovernment.com/2009/11/30/...ds/#more-38222

And they should be forced to answer why they lied? Any form, any angle to push these Marxists bastards' nose in the hoax, early and often. Liberalism has been exposed as the cruel hoax they are.

Good point, but for clarity, the "WMDs in Iraq" error was supported by both parties, the UN, most of the countries of the world, and all the major security agencies. They were all wrong, so its incorrect to tie the WMD falacy to bush or the republicans-----the libs will never stop to tell the truth, but the truth is that everyone was wrong about them.

Originally Posted by BushFuckingSucksDick

So if all you have is an email and Scientists in over 130 countries have actual data, who is the asshole again?

The data has been skewed, forged and manipulated.