go any lower than 28 percent? I'm bettin' it can. The man has 1-1/2 years left and, in this country, Klaus Barbie could get 25%.

Well there was a gentleman....I think Reagan was his name....his numbers...somewhere around 63%....but he still sucked....right? Does numbers really judge the quality of service or not? We cant have it both ways....they are numbers.....does this mean we have 28% that are real intellegent....or vise versa....If the truth lays in the majority...Mr.Reagan was indeed a great president...if we use these numbers only......how is it the same people that do claim that he sucked....claim Mr. Bush is a poor president with the same reasoning....just thought to ponder....I am confused again....do they(numbers) mean anything....or not...on one hand they mean everything....but on the other they mean nothing......well.... we choose to ignor....because they suck either way....right? BD

Well, plain and simple-Bush sucks, o.k.-regardless of how low or high his government sponsored poll ratings are, Bush sucks!!!

Even if Bush's "government sponsored" poll ratings fell into the negative 28 percentile range or even lower, he still has broken the guieness book of records for the biggest suck ass president on planet earth-hell, he's even beaten Jimmy Carter by a landslide on sucking!

Well what about the polls that show......the liberal congress with a 6-7% lower rating than....Mr. Bush....a few weeks ago....now that suckes. As does any that lean so far left..they must stand on their right leg...to relieve themselves. BD