Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > General Political Debate > General Political Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2007, 10:16 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 5,776
Default Clinton's secret police state (February 2, 1999)

http://worldnetdaily.com/news/articl...TICLE_ID=20498

President Clinton has waged an information war against America. Data accumulated inside the White House has taken prisoners, destroyed lives and provided valuable bounty for criminals. The war is designed to limit freedoms and control political opponents.

Recent examples, such as campaigns against Kathleen Willey and Monica Lewinsky, are lurid tips of the White House iceberg. The most fertile ground for information exploited by Clinton is the data stored inside law enforcement computers such as the FBI.

The FBI's NCIC system (National Criminal Information Center) is a network of computers erected by all the states that is tied to a central FBI network. It is the federal law enforcement Internet.

NCIC is a valuable tool to capture real criminals. NCIC was used to identify the vehicle in the New York towers bombing. It was NCIC that tipped Oklahoma police to hold Timothy McVeigh as a possible suspect in the Oklahoma City bombing. NCIC is used to check your status whenever a local police officer pulls you over on the road.

However, this system also has a long history of abuse. It has been used by an ex-police officer to stalk and kill his battered wife. It has been used by drug gangs to identify and murder anti-narcotics undercover agents.

NCIC has also been used for political crimes. Each and every one of the over 900 files held by the Clinton White House started with a check of the FBI NCIC data base. According to the FBI, the White House inquired for information from the FBI on over 22,000 people during 1993 and 1994.

There is open evidence the FBI computers were abused by Clinton. In June 1996, Lisa Wetzl, former White House intern under Craig Livingstone, testified during the Senate hearings that the very first task performed for White House reviews was a NCIC check.

In 1996, Howard Shapiro, then general counsel for the FBI, went to the White House to recover some of the hundreds of files taken by Clinton operatives Craig Livingstone and Anthony Marceca. According Shapiro's deposition there was the following exchange:

"Q. The list of names were in two boxes, is that correct?"

"A. Yes. The -- the documents referred to in the list of names were in two boxes."

"Q. And the third box contained what kind of documents that you determined were not FBI files?"

"A. For instance -- and it would seem to comport with what's on this first page -- various computer runs, various documents. It took us a while, and I'm -- I'm not sure I was ever advised in detail what it was. I was advised that I didn't need to worry about it was because it wasn't FBI information. It was like NCIC computer checks and things like that."

The legal counsel for the FBI had no law enforcement experience. Mr. Shapiro did not know NCIC computer information is FBI property so he left the boxes of computer information at the White House. They have never been recovered.

In August 1996, I received a letter from the Department of Justice, Margaret R. Owens -- unit chief of the Office of Public and Congressional Affairs. Owens wrote: "Unfortunately, the process of dealing with White House requests for file information was not managed as it should have been. You may be assured that all steps necessary to correct the deficiency have been taken and that the FBI will be more vigilant in the future."

However, the Clinton administration has little zeal for being "vigilant." There are no federal laws against government officials who abuse the NCIC system, and President Clinton wants to keep it that way.

Government employees who are caught can be charged with a local misdemeanor at best. In response to this lack-of-teeth in the law, Sen. Gregg, R-NH, proposed legislation in 1997 to make abuse of NCIC data files a felony. Clinton opposed Gregg's bill and had it defeated by Democrats in the Senate.

While giving his political operatives clear fields to run rampant inside federal computer files, Clinton has strived to accumulate more data for abuse. President Clinton made cynical use of the victims from the TWA-800 disaster to propose a whole new series of laws to combat terrorism, including expanding the FBI NCIC system to track the movements of every flying citizen.

According to the FBI and NTSB investigation, the TWA-800 crash was not caused by a terrorist bomb or enemy missile but by a faulty design in the central fuel tank.

The entire Clinton approach to law enforcement has been designed to limit freedom and obtain more power for Federal forces. The "pro" law enforcement stance of the Democrat President silenced left-wing privacy advocates in the Democratic party and drew the applause of big government Republicans.

Privacy advocates and right wing police supporters should learn that President Clinton makes the policy not to fight crime but for pure political power. The only difference between a Communist police state and a Nazi police state is which boot -- right or left -- is on your neck. The Clinton compromise is both boots on your neck.

One way to justify a power grab was to issue studies supporting ideas that are alien to America. For example, the White House hired the Rand Corporation to do a study of transnational terror and information warfare. Somewhere in the study the brains at Rand forgot the Constitution.

The Rand report states, "An important factor is the traditional change in the government's role as one moves from national defense through public safety toward things that represent the public good. Clearly, the government's perceived role in this area will have to be balanced against public perceptions of the loss of civil liberties and the commercial sector's concern about unwarranted limits on its practices and markets."

The word from Rand ... capitalists, conservatives, constitutionalists and privacy lovers beware. Your markets and civil liberties are at risk of being sacrificed in the name of the "public good."

The administration use of propaganda to dehumanize an imaginary domestic enemy of American citizens included issuing lies and fiction to itself. In 1993, the FBI issued a top secret report to President Clinton claiming that mass media computer security software could be used by criminals and terrorists to block federal wiretaps.

The FBI linked every crime imaginable to the need to ban the mass media PC software. The FBI report noted that a child "snuff" film ring was prosecuted using phone wire taps, implying that more children would be murdered on film unless computer security software was banned.

The FBI later told Congress the "snuff" story was false. No such ring existed. The top secret report was a fiction.

The FBI has claimed in public testimony that the Trade Tower bombers were caught using wiretaps of their phone. The fact is the terrorists were caught using an informant and a video camera hooked up inside their bomb factory. No wiretap information was produced at their trial.

The FBI has claimed to Congress that mobster John Gotti was prosecuted with wiretaps. The fact is no wire taps were used in Gotti's trial because he never used the phone for business. The FBI caught Gotti with a radio-microphone bug placed inside his home.

The FBI has sought access to millions of phone lines, claiming a need to expand wire taps against domestic terrorists and criminals. The fact is the FBI has issued on average about a thousand wiretaps a year for the last 10 years. None of the cases taken to prosecution involved violent terrorism crimes.

Meanwhile, the Democrats and the president claim to favor the privacy of the little people -- such as Monica Lewinsky. The White House generated outrage over Linda Tripp and her tapes of Monica are so false as to be laughable. Political Watergate-like break-ins and illegal third party taping of phone calls have become the norm under Clinton.

For example, Democrat Congressman McDermott released a tape of House Speaker Gingrich talking to other Republicans taken from an illegally monitored cellular phone call. The Reno-led Department of Justice has not prosecuted McDermott. With Reno running the show, don't hold your breath waiting.

Nor is the war just between Democrat and Republican. Inner party fist fights are becoming more vicious than the traditional two-party combat. For example, Senator Charles Robb had to dismiss two of his staff for illegally taping the phone calls of Democratic rival Governor Douglas Wilder. The subject of the Wilder phone taps was the hot relationship between the single black governor and a rich white widow.

The victors and the vanquished litter the new information battlefield. Clinton, McDermott and Robb are still in elected office but Gingrich and Wilder are gone. Politicians in the next century who are not electronically literate will find themselves on the back bench or out of office.

The modern world is full of computer tracking systems. Each of us creates an electronic image. You live in various databases or radiowaves in the sky as you move about doing business and living in the modern world. The use of your own electronic emissions against you is a form of oppression. The intent is to deny your freedom and increase the power of a few.

We must choose not to be tagged, tracked and controlled like some horrific animal experiment. We can remain individuals in a collective modern democracy. Law and order can be maintained without having to compromise our liberty. Justice can be done to those who abuse the system.

We can free ourselves and the world or enslave it. Technology can increase liberties and markets but only if we want it to do so. It is up to us to choose the path to tomorrow, electronic freedom or digital slavery.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-31-2007, 10:37 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,154
Default

The Real Hillary's Raw Socialism
By INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Wednesday, May 30, 2007 4:20 PM


Election 2008: Sen. Hillary Clinton shared on Tuesday her vision of the U.S. economy under her executive stewardship. She should change her party affiliation — or the name of her party.

Speaking in New Hampshire, Clinton acknowledged that instead of the "ownership society" that George W. Bush has promoted throughout his presidency, she prefers a "we're all in it together society" where prosperity is "broadly shared."

This is the sort of "it takes a village" rhetoric that tickles the ears of the left, and which can't give up its romantic notions of a collectivist utopia.

Dreams of the left, however, always turn out to be nightmares, and the world has seen its share of all-in-it-together societies that have failed. The Soviet Union, East Germany, North Korea and the worker's paradise/island prison of Cuba enter the mind right away.

Then there are the teetering soft-socialist systems of Europe, while socialist/communist power grabs now sapping the wealth and strength of Zimbabwe and Venezuela are contemporary lessons that can't be ignored.

Given these examples, do we really want to turn America into another experiment in collectivism? Are we willing to trade hard-won freedoms for government-provided security? Would we be willing to force those who don't want to participate into such a system?

Incredibly, many Americans would say yes to all three. An entitlement mentality has corrupted our nation and left-leaning politicians such as Clinton, as well as cynical chameleon opportunists, are skilled at exploiting the feelings of those who are driven by envy or guilt.

The root problem of a socialist — or village or nanny — state is that it robs people of their humanity and removes the incentives that bring economic progress. It produces a soul-draining apathy.

The cradle-to-grave system that is the hallmark of socialism provides no motivation for its beneficiaries to work harder, longer and smarter — all keys to greater prosperity. Irresponsibility, inefficiency and waste — enemies of economic expansion — are encouraged when property is wholly or mostly owned by the state rather than private individuals or corporations.

Consider the resource-rich Soviet Union. It held vast reserves of oil, natural gas, diamonds and gold, yet because the system killed incentives and property was (allegedly) commonly owned, it eventually collapsed. The dynamic economy that so many Western analysts had warned us about was nothing more than a series of five-year flops.

We're not here to label Hillary Clinton a socialist, but we really don't have to; she's done that job for us. The economic proposals she's lining up behind expose an undeniable affinity for raw socialism.

Promoting a leftist orthodoxy is not some new campaign ploy for Clinton. She's been at it for some time. At a 2004 fundraiser, she told supporters that "for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that (tax cuts) short and not give it to you. We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."

Earlier this year she promised that a third Clinton administration would seize oil company profits and use the money for government projects.

Who can forget her plan to force a universal health care plan on an ostensibly free people? That's not a free-market solution.

Sift through Clinton's history and it's clear that her swing to the left goes back much further than her husband's first term in the White House. Barbara Olson, a former federal general counsel and congressional investigator who tragically died on Flight 77 on Sept. 11, 2001, said in a 2000 interview that Clinton "has a political ideology that has its roots in Marxism."

In "Hell To Pay," Olson's 1999 book on "The unfolding story of Hillary Rodham Clinton," she writes about the New York's senator's attempt to mask her socialist ambitions in a children's rights veneer. The dust jacket describes Clinton as a "sixties radical" who "has maintained her ties to the radical left."

Inside, Olson tells of how much influence Saul Alinsky, the radical who once said that the "Reds' platform stood for all the right things," had on her as she formed her political philosophy in moving from a Goldwater Girl of the Midwest to an East Coast activist on the left.

Clinton's supporters will argue that those days don't count, that she has mainstreamed her views. What concerns us is that we might have to wait until she's elected president for those denials to be revealed as bunk.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-01-2007, 12:03 AM
rdnor's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,398
Default

OLD news ! we have a new war to fight ! It is about global domination and is not manufactured by Milton Bradley .
__________________
"If that's what it takes to keep the peace , then thank God for the bomb" Ozzy Osbourne Sat Cong !
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-01-2007, 12:53 AM
jan's Avatar
jan jan is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,064
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rdnor View Post
OLD news ! we have a new war to fight ! It is about global domination and is not manufactured by Milton Bradley .
A Risk fan? LOL! LOL! LOL!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-01-2007, 01:03 AM
Sam Sam is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,926
Default

Steve she gace a speech on economics and this is what is addressed:

That agenda, Mrs. Clinton said, included “leveling the playing field” by reducing tax breaks for major corporations; allow Medicare to negotiate lower drug prices with pharmaceutical companies; eliminate incentives that lead American companies to move jobs overseas; change the tax code so companies no longer escape taxes by moving business profits overseas; “recommit ourselves” to the goal of giving all students a chance to go to college; and provide universal health care and addressing social security.


(Where the heck did the article you posted jump from this to socialism!)
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-01-2007, 01:03 AM
rdnor's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jan View Post
A Risk fan? LOL! LOL! LOL!
Played a 24 hr. game (1982) and have not played since . It took a lot out of me . Besides the one girl that was playing with decided she was going to capitulate .
__________________
"If that's what it takes to keep the peace , then thank God for the bomb" Ozzy Osbourne Sat Cong !
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-01-2007, 01:05 AM
rdnor's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam View Post
Steve she gace a speech on economics and this is what is addressed:

That agenda, Mrs. Clinton said, included “leveling the playing field” by reducing tax breaks for major corporations; allow Medicare to negotiate lower drug prices with pharmaceutical companies; eliminate incentives that lead American companies to move jobs overseas; change the tax code so companies no longer escape taxes by moving business profits overseas; “recommit ourselves” to the goal of giving all students a chance to go to college; and provide universal health care and addressing social security.


(Where the heck did the article you posted jump from this to socialism!)
Hell , lets just move to France !
__________________
"If that's what it takes to keep the peace , then thank God for the bomb" Ozzy Osbourne Sat Cong !
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06-01-2007, 01:10 AM
Sam Sam is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,926
Default

True you would receive better healthcare in France then the US, but that is not what she is promoting.She is promoting big corporations pay taxes just like you and I and we negotiate medicare drug prices so taxpayers do not foot the billion dollar bill inflated pharmaceuticals.

Tax payers overpaid in the tune of 40 billion in pharmaceutial costs. I applaud Hillary for hving the fortitude to address this American tax payer rip off.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-01-2007, 01:16 AM
cat's meow's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mid-south
Posts: 12,129
Default

Sorry Gix, you are just jealous you did not have an intern that was willing to polish your knob.

And, the witchhunt that went after Clinton was led by no other than ta da, Newt Gingrich who was banging his own intern who would become wife #3.

Quote:
The legal counsel for the FBI had no law enforcement experience. Mr. Shapiro did not know NCIC computer information is FBI property so he left the boxes of computer information at the White House. They have never been recovered.
...and so no one knew what the f*** was actually in them, all speculation and a bunch of crap. Please, STOP!

Please, no more WorldNetDaily stupid BS...

Last edited by cat's meow; 06-01-2007 at 01:20 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 06-01-2007, 01:19 AM
Sam Sam is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,926
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cat's meow View Post
Sorry Gix, you are just jealous you did not have an intern that was willing to polish your knob.

And, the witchhunt that went after Clinton was led by no other than ta da, Newt Gingrich who was banging his own intern who would become wife #3.

Please, no more WorldNet stupid BS...

Cat I really am laughing right now.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


» Navigation

Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!


$5 monthly donation:

$10 monthly donation:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0