+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1
    Little Salt's Avatar
    Little Salt is offline Political Mastermind
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,380

    Default The irony of “reconciliation”

    Hot Air Blog Archive The irony of “reconciliation”

    The New York Times offers a strong hint that Democrats in the Senate will use the budget reconciliation process as a cover to move ObamaCare through the chamber to avoid a filibuster. The Democrats will “go it alone,” the headline reads, although the actual report makes the how of that rather ambiguous. And well it should, since the Democrats know — or should know — that to try reconciliation would be an invitation to a war that would bring Congress to a screeching halt:

    Given hardening Republican opposition to Congressional health care proposals, Democrats now say they see little chance of the minority’s cooperation in approving any overhaul, and are increasingly focused on drawing support for a final plan from within their own ranks.

    Top Democrats said Tuesday that their go-it-alone view was being shaped by what they saw as Republicans’ purposely strident tone against health care legislation during this month’s Congressional recess, as well as remarks by leading Republicans that current proposals were flawed beyond repair.

    Rahm Emanuel, the White House chief of staff, said the heated opposition was evidence that Republicans had made a political calculation to draw a line against any health care changes, the latest in a string of major administration proposals that Republicans have opposed. …

    The Democratic shift may not make producing a final bill much easier. The party must still reconcile the views of moderate and conservative Democrats worried about the cost and scope of the legislation with those of more liberal lawmakers determined to win a government-run insurance option to compete with private insurers.

    In fact, the article never mentions the word “reconciliation,” the process by which the Senate approves a budget for the federal government. Under the rules of reconciliation, no cloture vote is needed, as the chamber has a Constitutional duty to produce a budget. Some Democrats have threatened this for months, notably Chuck Schumer, but the plan has a couple of big flaws. First, the Democrats have to convince the Senate parliamentarian, ostensibly non-partisan, to agree that the bill is primarily budgetary. No one in their right mind could honestly make that judgment about massive regulation of 15% of the American economy. They’re likely to get denied before they even get started.

    However, if they do manage to get past that obstacle, the Republicans can shut down the Senate for the next year. Those unfamiliar with the parliamentary procedure may not realize that a great many steps get skipped by unanimous consent. Bill-reading is just one example. One Senator can force each and every bill to be read aloud at every appearance it makes on the Senate floor, including when they are sent to committee. For ObamaCare and cap-and-trade, one bill reading could take a week, keeping the Senate floor locked off from any other business.

    Traditionally, Senators give each other the courtesy of unanimous consent to allow business to proceed at a normal pace. If the Democrats try to force ObamaCare through reconciliation, that unanimous consent will dissipate faster than an Obama expiration date. It won’t take the entire Republican caucus to gum up the works, either; it only takes a single objection to end unanimous consent, and the GOP has more than a couple of conservative firebrands who will gladly toss sand in the gears to stop Harry Reid from steamrolling them.

    Democrats might think that this will gain them sympathy with the public, but not if they’re breaking rules to pass an increasingly unpopular and intrusive piece of legislation. It will create a firestorm of anger even worse than what we’ve seen in the townhalls thus far. They would be signing their way to minority status, especially in the House. They can kiss the rest of their agenda goodbye for the rest of this session, too, including cap-and-trade. Even budgeting will prove very difficult.

    There’s a reason the Times didn’t mention reconciliation. It’s a bluff. Not even Harry Reid is this foolish.

  2. #2
    phxcon's Avatar
    phxcon is offline Juden!
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    16,798

    Default

    If this action is, indeed, taken by the democraps, it will sound the death knell of the DNC. There is enough righteous anger on both sides of the aisle that a move like this will be viewed as the DNC attempting to slip this pile of vomit under the door.

    There will be no bipartisan bill. There won't even be a party line bill among the democraps. Many of them are scared shitless of their consitutents right now and a re seeking cover. I would not be at all surprised if this bill doesn't just evaporate into thin air just like Hillarycare.
    I can see November 2nd from my house!!!

  3. #3
    Gummer's Avatar
    Gummer is offline Big Dog
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    The deep end of the gene pool
    Posts
    10,974
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I hope they do it!!! doing so will guarantee Obama a Republican Congress (both houses) for his FINAL 2 years in the White House .... and since it Obamacare won't be implemented before his ass is sent back to Illinois in 2012 ..... It will be easy enough to undo .....

  4. #4
    Little Salt's Avatar
    Little Salt is offline Political Mastermind
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,380

    Default

    To Gummer and phxcon,

    They almost certainly would do it if they could. When they put out that stuff about Obozo being ready to be a one-term President if it means passing marxist health care, I fully believe them.

    Obozo and his hardcore supporters are radical marxists. The only thing stopping them so far is Congressional inertia which has been further reinforced by public opinion going against Obozo care

  5. #5
    phxcon's Avatar
    phxcon is offline Juden!
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    16,798

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Little Salt View Post
    To Gummer and phxcon,

    They almost certainly would do it if they could. When they put out that stuff about Obozo being ready to be a one-term President if it means passing marxist health care, I fully believe them.

    Obozo and his hardcore supporters are radical marxists. The only thing stopping them so far is Congressional inertia which has been further reinforced by public opinion going against Obozo care
    Nothing wrong with a little congressional inertia at this point in this debate. The bill needs to die a horror movie death, all exploded with blood and guts shooting out.
    I can see November 2nd from my house!!!

  6. #6
    obamerican's Avatar
    obamerican is offline Bill E Bob/con-fascist
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    America Inc.
    Posts
    36,697

    Thumbs down

    Who's 'obozo' ASSCLOWN n00b? Are you a 'birther' too? You seem to fit right in using an AV of rightie-tools on this site. Congrats. Fuck you.
    Total cliche, this guy. He's a strung-out, washed-up, has-been, jerk, snitch fuckin' drunk seven-layer loser. Right. And I'm prayin' he puts up a fight. Please please please. Rape him! If it's possible.
    ~ Rupert "Rip" Reed

  7. #7
    Little Salt's Avatar
    Little Salt is offline Political Mastermind
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,380

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phxcon View Post
    Nothing wrong with a little congressional inertia at this point in this debate. The bill needs to die a horror movie death, all exploded with blood and guts shooting out.
    Hee Hee. Especially the Senate. Many Bills have gone to the Senate and died. Lets hope this one winds up in the Senate Mortuary too.

  8. #8
    Little Salt's Avatar
    Little Salt is offline Political Mastermind
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,380

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by obamagirl View Post
    Fuck you.
    err... No thanks

  9. #9
    Gummer's Avatar
    Gummer is offline Big Dog
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    The deep end of the gene pool
    Posts
    10,974
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by obamerican View Post
    Who's 'obozo' ASSCLOWN n00b? Are you a 'birther' too? You seem to fit right in using an AV of rightie-tools on this site. Congrats. Fuck you.
    ... obamacoon .... you probably think I have forgotten you with all of the other imbeciles practicing verbal diarrhea (your forte) ..... but rest assured .... you remain on the "short list" for the title "AWE Village Idiot" ......

  10. #10
    obamerican's Avatar
    obamerican is offline Bill E Bob/con-fascist
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    America Inc.
    Posts
    36,697

    Question

    Quote Originally Posted by Gummer View Post
    ... obamacoon .... you probably think I have forgotten you with all of the other imbeciles practicing verbal diarrhea (your forte) ..... but rest assured .... you remain on the "short list" for the title "AWE Village Idiot" ......
    Why.....don't.....you.....watch.....your.....littl e.....poodle.....little.....salt?
    Total cliche, this guy. He's a strung-out, washed-up, has-been, jerk, snitch fuckin' drunk seven-layer loser. Right. And I'm prayin' he puts up a fight. Please please please. Rape him! If it's possible.
    ~ Rupert "Rip" Reed

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
 
Side Column

Social Groups


Political Links Page


Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!