I have read an excellent bestseller by Paul Kennedy.
" The Rise and Fall of The Great Powers".
I have read Steven Ambrose "Rise to Globalism"..
These are two excellent if differing perspectives.
Kennedy's book is the more interesting because he
studies the very ebb and flow that this thread debates.
He examines the civilization/empires that have dominated human history.
He observes in a new argument that the economic growth
rate in comparison to rival ( and in economics ALL are competing )
societies is a critical factor in the tensions that lead to war.
.. From the Egyptian Empire to the minute relationships
involved in the ascendancy of North America,
the United States in particular. The points that refer to Asia,
specifically China, and the grave tensions in the middle east.
. America has a growth rate and a State ultra-competence
that guarantees a dominance regardless of
ANY particular administration.
Barring the actions of societies that are
NOT growing at that rate ..
( or even socially stagnating. )..
who's own security concerns ( the constant tension between citizen and gov't) are of an internal one.
This is why external enemies are made and why the NON-civilized EXTREMIST response abrogates civil order
..LAW..( the moral and "fair" law, ).
..The Muslim civilization is facing a conflict between
it's old world social mechanics
and economic patterns and the dynamic, growing, and socially threatening power of the West.
This is first a social/economic conflict..
the religion and its dominance makes this inevitably a threat to their faith.
( Not unlike the crisis the Catholic Church faced in Europe's Reformation.)
The expression of the reaction to the real challenge Capitalist vitality
( and inherent political and economic radicalism)
makes to all societies has been a range from Ludditeism to Marx
to the Kazinski/ eco guerrillas attacks on business.
They also can be expressed in the religion's own militancy and hysteria.
The fact is that there are Islamic clerics and leader's who have been preaching an open and violent war with the West
and with the United States in particular.
They have been preaching a violent and religiously
inspired genocide against Infidels, Israel and jews in general.
The Fact is that there are powerful, and very widely followed factions of Islam who ARE our enemies.
They ARE conducting a deep and far reaching war on our technological level.. as well as rousing a large number of less-than-informed Umma.
The Russian economic base will always suffer from limitations.
The Chinese/ Japanese economic juggernaut is inevitable..
Their particular present agenda also indicates a collision.
That is not for two decades hence. The African and the Middle Eastern economies MUST go through so serious a transformation ..
The West..and Therefore the United States must either stand aside and watch OR it must assume the authority of "global law."
..The keeper of order..
We have been the target of MANY strikes in this war
THEIR desperation leads them to.
They have been at war with human civilization and order..
in the name of their religion for a hundred years..
and have been very deadly for three decades.
You all know that any one of these incidents
would bring the United States to a war of covert or overt means.
George Washington was virtually coronated as
Commander-in-Chief and President after fighting
a war against 5% taxes. The factions he referred to was a caveat against what is also an inevitable element of human civilization..
not as if one great general could change what was an integral part of our representative democracy..
( faction is a coalition of like minded citizens..
that one or another is organized around the people of that especial time
and so rises or falls by the allegiance of it's constituency )
and it
is not the same thing
..He also warned against entangling TREATIES..
and THAT is both a different argument
AND an accomplished fact of America in the 21st century. Right?
In Fact, By the opening of the 1800's the United States was at a fever and a state of war with what amounted to a series of Barbary Pirates and City States. The war ranged from an embarassing kidnappings, murders, and tribute; to the USS Philadelphia's grounding and loss. After many interesting tidbits happened during that "crusade".
And where were the government declarations of truth?
Oh yeah after a decade of war with the arabs..
we merely BEAT them into a sullen submission
( see WWI)
Amyway.. This is boring and irrelevant to
narrow and shallow perspectives.
I realize that its comfortable to be led to the
indignant outrage towards your government...
But America did not deal well with the Middle East
for the last thirty years.
THEY struck with violence first. Various Baathist
regimes and Hussein's Iraq DEFINITELY supported and abetted
the values and the revolutionaries..
Al-Qaeda, and the more familiar anti-Jewish terrorists.
Iran has been a society that has been seized by a "hysterical",
radical Islamic "faction" in the most violent mold.
They have declared themselves to be our enemy
since their revolution in '78-'79.
They have been the wrench in the works .
United States MUST respond in a manner that is a victory.
We are not conducting such a war,
and the reasons include why our very citizens are asking
the defeatist and cowardly question this thread is called.
Fehrenbach's book "This Kind of War" also addresses this
elemental flaw in our democratic, and individualistic democracy..
We do not want to be the one who has to be
the cop in the bad neighborhood.
Guess what?
Someone has to step up and be authority..
Otherwise we will fall LONG before we stagnate.
The lack of perspective and maturity on these threads, and in the leftist media is breathtaking. Indeed, the talking points ARE the one that rewinds back to "Liar, Liar"
and appeasing head in the sandism..
Tell me which version you prefer.
MTC
