Thread: The Red Cross Torture Report: What It Means

Originally Posted by rocat

Mans inhumanity to man is a terrible thing. War is a terrible thing. But trying to fight wars by rules has never worked--remember viet nam?

I was there.

Originally Posted by Get Real

He ignores those and continue in his spinning. He has to keep convincing himself that those things are not torture.

What spinning? Requiring a definition you cannot give? Give an objective definition, not subject to interpretation and you win.


A proper definition could be written if anyone was willing to give up the power to interpret and accuse.

Originally Posted by FIAWOL

No, he is just a liar.

If you are referring to me, point out the lie. Please have any example you give meeet the definition of lie.


By the way, I have, for the most part, been asking a question. I don't think a question can be a lie.

Originally Posted by bobcatsmoosh

If you are referring to me, point out the lie. Please have any example you give meeet the definition of lie.


By the way, I have, for the most part, been asking a question. I don't think a question can be a lie.

For one, you lied when you cited the Webster's definition of torture, Stupid.....

Originally Posted by A. Crowley

For one, you lied when you cited the Webster's definition of torture, Stupid.....

I commented on the definition, it was not my citation.

Originally Posted by bobcatsmoosh

I commented on the definition, it was not my citation.

You cherry-picked the definition you cited.


Stupid fucking loser cunt.

I have a question for the tree hugging lollipop and unicorn fur liberal crowd.

What is not torture? What can we do to a captive in a holding facility to gain information?

Can we tickle their feet? Can we make them uncomfortable? Can we show them whatsyurprob's gay porn collection? Can we force them to listen to OverFedAmerican's radio show? How about feeding them pork, can we do that?

You tell us horrible terrible neocon nazi bad people what's okay - mmkay?

Originally Posted by A. Crowley

You cherry-picked the definition you cited.


Stupid fucking loser cunt.

Just commented on the definition that was cited.

Nevertheless, if I happened to fail to read something and posted an opinion in error it does not match the definiion of LIE. (not saying I did)

See, you have another problem with definitions.

Originally Posted by bobcatsmoosh

No it isn't. Torture is prohibited, but torture is only defined in vauge, fuzzy terms subject to interpretation.

Only fuzzy to moronic liars like you. Clear enough to any reasonable person.

Originally Posted by DammitBoy!

I have a question for the tree hugging lollipop and unicorn fur liberal crowd.

What is not torture? What can we do to a captive in a holding facility to gain information?

Can we tickle their feet? Can we make them uncomfortable? Can we show them whatsyurprob's gay porn collection? Can we force them to listen to OverFedAmerican's radio show? How about feeding them pork, can we do that?

You tell us horrible terrible neocon nazi bad people what's okay - mmkay?

This question has gone unaddressed by our lib contingent for a loooooong time.