 |
|

01-17-2007, 07:44 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,099
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RASTAMAN
I refer to Fox News as "FAUX NEWS" b/c they are a shill for the W.H. The Bush Administtration turns to FAUX NEWS" to go lick their wounds and try to spin the story to re-build their bruised ego and reputations.
Foxnews reminds me of Nazi Germany - the facts just don't matter. You're on our network if you can yell louder than me we will cut your mic. I watch The Factor because I find it comical but more than that I like watching their propaganda techniques.
BBC is the only truely 'fair and balanced' news network in the world!
No adverts, no corporate agenda, no political agenda and no religious agenda.
BECAUSE ITS PAID FOR WITH TAXES AND NOT COMPANIES OR INDIVIDUALS.
I don't believe that any of the mainstream news channels are left-leaning. Republicans merely control the dialog. If they say that it is so enough times, people begin to believe it. And Republicans have been complaining about "Leftist" media for the last decade. Just because you are to the left of Republicans doesn't make you leftist.
Here is an example of why Fox is known as FAUX NEWS:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VuYDRrmIH2w
|
So if you can attack sources then why is it unacceptable for others? Also, Fox News is far more reliable than prisonplanet, you have got to at least admit that Rasta. I said a while back that no matter who is in power prisonplanet will attack them with some conspiracy theory. Recently they posted an article saying how Democrats were assaullting free speech, which is nuts. They use parts of facts and twist them around the way they want them. They were the same ones who said that Clinton was trying to enforce the NWO with concentration camps and that the Clinton administration was behind the OKC bombing and Columbine! Those are ridiculous positions! All I am saying is that if they are valid now that they would assumingly be valid then as well. I don't believe that they are or were valid sources of information.
|

01-17-2007, 07:50 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 5,776
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RASTAMAN
I refer to Fox News as "FAUX NEWS" b/c they are a shill for the W.H. The Bush Administtration turns to FAUX NEWS" to go lick their wounds and try to spin the story to re-build their bruised ego and reputations.
Foxnews reminds me of Nazi Germany - the facts just don't matter. You're on our network if you can yell louder than me we will cut your mic. I watch The Factor because I find it comical but more than that I like watching their propaganda techniques.
BBC is the only truely 'fair and balanced' news network in the world!
No adverts, no corporate agenda, no political agenda and no religious agenda.
BECAUSE ITS PAID FOR WITH TAXES AND NOT COMPANIES ORINDIVIDUALS.
I don't believe that any of the mainstream news channels are left-leaning. Republicans merely control the dialog. If they say that it is so enough times, people begin to believe it. And Republicans have been complaining about "Leftist" media for the last decade. Just because you are to the left of Republicans doesn't make you leftist.
Here is an example of why Fox is known as FAUX NEWS:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VuYDRrmIH2w
|
If what you say you whole heatedly beleive. Then you must agree the same argument are made for democrats and the socialist agenda by CNN,CBS,NBC,ABC,MSNBC,NYT,WP,LAT,BG,NSWK,TIME, USA TODAY, Reuters and the list keeps going and going
|

01-17-2007, 08:17 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,767
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom1
Don't be hurt Rastaman, just because your source is the 'Archbishop'. You had a chance to defend him and you chose not to. I also told you where Baldwin lied when you asked and I notice you dropped that one like a hot potato. Why was that? Maybe because you now remember that he was proven to be a liar? Oh, you can also answer that question on prisonplanet that was asked.
You seem to get mad when you are challenged. With Steve and I you just call us deciders, with other conservatives you refer to them as inbred, knuckle draggers, or some other equally moronic name. If you can't handle it then find somewhere else to post things such as Bush=Hitler or other diatribes by Baldwin, Jones, or the 'Archbishop'. Because you have to realize that when you post sources such as these you will be challenged on them.
Why do you think it is OK to refer to Fox as "Faux News" but people like the 'Archbishop' can't be challenged? You can answer this as well if you would like, but I doubt we will hear from you. Probably just a response such as Bush sucks. My, my, what great range you have.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gixaholic
If what you say you whole heatedly beleive. Then you must agree the same argument are made for democrats and the socialist agenda by CNN,CBS,NBC,ABC,MSNBC,NYT,WP,LAT,BG,NSWK,TIME, USA TODAY, Reuters and the list keeps going and going
|
Give me an example......provide a URL link.
__________________
AMERICA LAND OF THE FREE HOME OF THE BRAVE--BECAUSE OF OUR CONSTITUTION.
|

01-17-2007, 08:20 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,099
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RASTAMAN
Give me an example......provide a URL link.
|
Post a link to what?
|

01-17-2007, 08:21 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,099
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom1
So if you can attack sources then why is it unacceptable for others? Also, Fox News is far more reliable than prisonplanet, you have got to at least admit that Rasta. I said a while back that no matter who is in power prisonplanet will attack them with some conspiracy theory. Recently they posted an article saying how Democrats were assaullting free speech, which is nuts. They use parts of facts and twist them around the way they want them. They were the same ones who said that Clinton was trying to enforce the NWO with concentration camps and that the Clinton administration was behind the OKC bombing and Columbine! Those are ridiculous positions! All I am saying is that if they are valid now that they would assumingly be valid then as well. I don't believe that they are or were valid sources of information.
|
What about this Rasta? If prisonplanet is valid now then wouldn't they be valid at other times?
|

01-17-2007, 08:30 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,767
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom1
So if you can attack sources then why is it unacceptable for others? Also, Fox News is far more reliable than prisonplanet, you have got to at least admit that Rasta. I said a while back that no matter who is in power prisonplanet will attack them with some conspiracy theory. Recently they posted an article saying how Democrats were assaullting free speech, which is nuts. They use parts of facts and twist them around the way they want them. They were the same ones who said that Clinton was trying to enforce the NWO with concentration camps and that the Clinton administration was behind the OKC bombing and Columbine! Those are ridiculous positions! All I am saying is that if they are valid now that they would assumingly be valid then as well. I don't believe that they are or were valid sources of information.
|
The sources you have used and the sources I have used serve as one purpose....to allow the viewers to think and draw their own conclusions and beliefs. Our sources stir debate and argument.
Fox has a much larger audience and influence on how it present news than prision planet. The "Out Foxed" dvd/You Tube show explicitedly how Fox slants the news to propagandic levels. The problem with Prison Planet is that Alex Jones format is too predict the news versus report the news. Although to a degree Alex Jones serves as the cannary in the coal mine or the sky is falling to degree.
__________________
AMERICA LAND OF THE FREE HOME OF THE BRAVE--BECAUSE OF OUR CONSTITUTION.
|

01-17-2007, 08:31 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,767
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom1
Post a link to what?
|
I was referring to Gix is comment.
__________________
AMERICA LAND OF THE FREE HOME OF THE BRAVE--BECAUSE OF OUR CONSTITUTION.
|

01-17-2007, 08:38 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,099
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RASTAMAN
The sources you have used and the sources I have used serve as one purpose....to allow the viewers to think and draw their own conclusions and beliefs. Our sources stir debate and argument.
Fox has a much larger audience and influence on how it present news than prision planet. The "Out Foxed" dvd/You Tube show explicitedly how Fox slants the news to propagandic levels. The problem with Prison Planet is that Alex Jones format is too predict the news versus report the news. Although to a degree Alex Jones serves as the cannary in the coal mine or the sky is falling to degree.
|
But Alex Jones reports the news as facts often times. I haven't viewed his videos, but have talked to those who have. He says these things are true. I actually remember him saying that Columbine was a creation of the Clinton administration. I thought the guy was bonkers then and I couldn't believe that he had such a following. It has since grown, or else we just have more access to it with the internet. I used to hear him on the radio and he had a rabid following even then.
|

01-17-2007, 10:33 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,767
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom1
What about this Rasta? If prisonplanet is valid now then wouldn't they be valid at other times?
|
I told you that prison planet predicts the news so if they're predictions don't hold true then yes, they are not valid. However, what happens when prison planet predictions become true.......are they still invalid?
__________________
AMERICA LAND OF THE FREE HOME OF THE BRAVE--BECAUSE OF OUR CONSTITUTION.
|

01-17-2007, 10:37 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,099
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RASTAMAN
I told you that prison planet predicts the news so if they're predictions don't hold true then yes, they are not valid. However, what happens when prison planet predictions become true.......are they still invalid?
|
If the predictions are vague then it is like a fortune cookie or the horoscope.
However, they are not saying that most of their new items are predictions. Again, the most disgusting example was saying that the US government was responsible for Columbine. It is hard for me to ever believe a person who says this is fact and that he has proof.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|