European Warmongering for Israel - by Bob Finch - Vanguard News Network Forum

European Warmongering for Israel - by Bob Finch



Since the false flag attacks of 9/11, zionist control over american politics has become so blatant that the Israel isn’t bothering to camouflage its power, "And subtly but surely, things are changing still further. Israel is starting to let the mask drop, not from its already public intentions, but from its naked strength. It no longer deigns to conceal its sophisticated nuclear arsenal.... And it no longer sees any need to be discreet about its defiance of the United States' request for moderation: Israel is happy to humiliate the 'stupid Americans' outright. As it plunders, starves and kills, Israel does not lurk in the world's back-alleys. It says, "Look at us. We're taking these people's land, not because we need it, but because we feel like it. We're putting religious nuts all over it because they help cleanse the area of these Arab lice who dare to defy us. We know you don't like it and we don't care, because we don't conform to other people's standards. We set the standards for others." (Michael Neumann ‘What's So Bad About Israel?’).

The President of the United States seems to regard himself as a shabbat goy and openly proclaims he will defend the Jews-only state in Palestine even if it launches an illegal, pre-emptive, attack on Iran. In the case of Iran, President Bush has been unabashed in naming Israel as the most probable target of any Iranian nuclear weapons. He has also created a rhetorical lash-up of the U.S. and Israel, referring to Israel as an "ally" of the U.S., as if to condition Americans to the notion that the U.S. is required to join Israel in any confrontation with Iran.

The neocons have been the most prominent political force in American politics over the last three decades but their influence has only recently become apparent in europe. Blair has always been a shabbat goy. One of the first points he made when he became leader of the labour party in 1994 was to insist that his party curb its support for Palestinian freedom fighters and a palestinian state. Britain is a self proclaimed property-owning democracy but apparently it cannot find any objection to zionists stealing Palestinian property and dismantling Palestinian democratic organizations. The Danish have a neocon leader who sent a military contingent to support the zionist proxy invasion of Iraq, "There is clearly a more sinister reason why the Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen refuses to issue a formal apology as demanded by Arab and Muslim governments. The hard-line position taken by Rasmussen, an ally in the "war on terror," has more to do with advancing the "clash of civilizations" than defending free speech in Europe." (Christopher Bollyn ‘European Media Provokes Muslims to Inflame Zionist "Clash of Civilizations’). Silvio berlusconi of italy has always been on the right and shown a predilection for bush’s zionist policies.

The French opposed the war against Iraq and once ridiculed neocon ideas. "You know things are going badly indeed in Iraq when U.S. Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad chooses to use an image – Pandora's box – previously wielded only by that critic of the Iraq War, French President Jacques Chirac. Back in September 2004, Chirac compared American actions in Iraq to the famed box of myth, at a moment when the Arab League head Amr Moussa was warning that the "gates of Hell" had been opened in that country (a comment assumed at the time to be but another example of overemotional Arab rhetoric)." (Tom Engelhardt ‘Disintegrating Iraqi Sovereignty’). However, after a French minister referred to the Jews-only state in Palestine as a "shitty little country" Ariel Sharon retaliated by suggesting that the Jews living in France ought to emigrate to Palestine. In order to show that France was a country safe for Jewish supremacists, the French government went on the offensive against the country’s substantial moslem population provoking riots across the country. Chirac was right but now he’s fallen in line.

For the last couple of years the British, French, and German governments have been attempting to moderate America’s zionist inspired belligerence toward Iran over its development of nuclear energy – despite the fact that Iran has been acting in accordance with the non-proliferation treaty. The euro-3 let it be known they were opposed to referring the matter to the United Nations or to a military attack on Iran especially since such an attack would have even less legal justification than the invasion of Iraq. However, after the election in Germany of Angela Merkel, a slavish devotee to ziocon supremacism, the balance of power in Europe has shifted significantly towards the ziocons.

In 2006 the French President Jacques Chirac stated he would respond to acts of terrorism on French soil with the use of a nuclear bomb. "Chirac for his part is the subject of major controversy since he gave a speech on January 19 in which he overturned the traditional French nuclear doctrine of "no first strike" to say that were a terrorist nation to attack France, he would consider even nuclear retaliation as appropriate." (F William Engdahl ‘A high-risk game of nuclear chicken’). One commentator believes Chirac was giving america the go-ahead to use nuclear weapons in a war against Iran, "In particular, the widely but wrongly discounted nuclear belligerence of President Jacques Chirac last month implied that France was ready to accept the US use of nuclear weapons in a war against Iran if they saw fit to do so." (Paul Levian ‘Iran and the jaws of a trap’). In effect he was also doing the same for the Jews-only state.

Iran’s resumption of nuclear research was the catalyst for the neocons’ emergence as the dominant political force in europe, "It is remarkable how quickly an international consensus has emerged for the eventual use of force against Iran. Chirac's indirect reference to the French nuclear capability was a warning to Tehran. Mohamed ElBaradei, whose Nobel Peace Prize last year was awarded to rap the knuckles of the United States, told Newsweek that in the extreme case, force might be required to stop Iran's acquiring a nuclear capability. German Defense Minister Franz Josef Jung told the newspaper Bild am Sonntag that the military option could not be abandoned, although diplomatic efforts should be tried first. Bild, Germany's largest-circulation daily, ran Iranian President Mahmud Ahmedinejad's picture next to Adolf Hitler's, with the headline, "Will Iran plunge the world into the abyss?" The same Europeans who excoriated the United States for invading Iraq with insufficient proof of the presence of weapons of mass destruction already have signed on to a military campaign against Iran, in advance of Iran's gaining WMD." (Spengler ‘Why the West will attack Iran’).

This is the political context of the publication of anti-Islamic cartoons. Most commentators have suggested the origins of the cartoons goes back to October 2004 when flemming rose, the cultural editor of denmark's most widely read morning paper Jyllands-Posten, interviewed Daniel Pipes, an extreme Jewish racist, and the leading American proponent of the ziocon led war against the moslem world, the so-called war of civilizations. Rose wrote a complimentary article about Pipes’s views. "Rose traveled to Philadelphia in October 2004 to visit Daniel Pipes, the Neo-Con ideologue who says the only path to Middle East peace will come through a total Israeli military victory. Rose then penned a positive article about Pipes, who compares "militant Islam" with fascism and communism." (Christopher Bollyn ‘European Media Provokes Muslims to Inflame Zionist "Clash of Civilizations’). James petras has unearthed a more detailed background, "Given Mossad’s long-standing penetration of the Danish intelligence agencies, and their close working relations with the right wing media, it is not surprising that a Ukranian Jew, operating under the name of "Flemming Rose" with close working relations with the Israeli state (and in particular the far right Likud regime) should be the center of the controversy over the cartoons. "Rose’s" ties to the Israeli state antedate his well-know promotional "interview" with Daniel Pipes (2004), the notorious Arab-hating Zionist ideologue. Prior to being placed as a cultural editor of a leading right-wing Danish daily, from 1990 to 1995 "Rose" was a Moscow-based reporter who translated into Danish a self-serving auto-biography by Boris Yeltsin, godchild of the pro-Israeli, post-communist Russian oligarchs, most of whom held dual citizenship and collaborated with the Mossad in laundering illicit billions. Between 1996-1999 "Rose", the journalist, worked the Washington circuit (traveling with Clinton to China) before returning to Moscow 1999-2004 as a reporter for Jyllands-Posten. In 2005 he became its cultural editor, despite few or any knowledge of the field and over the head of other Danish journalists on the staff. In his new position "Rose" found a powerful platform to incite and play on the growing hostility of conservative Danes to immigrants from the Middle East, particularly practicing Moslems. Using the format of an ‘interview’ he published Pipes’ virulent anti-Islamic diatribe, probably to "test the waters" before proceeding to the next stage in the Mossad strategy to polarize a West-East confrontation." (James Petras and Robin Eastman-Abaya ‘The Caricatures in Middle East Politics’).

read the rest of the article through the site above

The neocons have been the most prominent political force in American politics over the last three decades but their influence has only recently become apparent in europe. Blair has always been a shabbat goy

For the last couple of years the British, French, and German governments have been attempting to moderate America’s zionist inspired belligerence toward Iran over its development of nuclear energy – despite the fact that Iran has been acting in accordance with the non-proliferation treaty

Since the false flag attacks of 9/11, zionist control over american politics has become so blatant that the Israel isn’t bothering to camouflage its power, "And subtly but surely, things are changing still further. Israel is starting to let the mask drop, not from its already public intentions, but from its naked strength. It no longer deigns to conceal its sophisticated nuclear arsenal