Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > General Political Debate > General Political Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2008, 11:50 PM
LCOF's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,266
Default

O what the hell, progressive is the camouflage for lib, or in context Marxists.
__________________
McCAIN PALIN
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2008, 11:56 PM
Sir Les Patterson's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In the hills just north of Melbourne Australia
Posts: 1,012
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LCOF View Post
O what the hell, progressive is the camouflage for lib, or in context Marxists.
and Marxist is simply a synonym for sub-human American hatin' anti-Christ.
__________________
“Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." - George Bernard Shaw
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2008, 10:43 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 11,108
Default

Quote:
IF..... you are not "progressive" ....... there is a real good chance you actually have a brain ........
>>>Yeah, I know what you mean. The Mullah Omar and the rightwing Republicans have world class "brains".
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2008, 10:51 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 11,108
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skinny Fatts View Post
Progressives like Woodrow Wilson? Actually, there is a lot of WW in Obama, now isn't there?
>>>Woody didn't care much for WWI and the League of Nations was a failure. It failed because "retrogressives" made it fail. There are folks out there who believe war is inevitable if the dogma is to be maintained, so we might as well get on with it. Progressives couldn't give a shit less about 'dogma'. Count me in that group.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2008, 10:56 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,030
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George O Well View Post
>>>Woody didn't care much for WWI and the League of Nations was a failure. It failed because "retrogressives" made it fail. There are folks out there who believe war is inevitable if the dogma is to be maintained, so we might as well get on with it. Progressives couldn't give a shit less about 'dogma'. Count me in that group.
No it failed because WW refused to compromise and insisted that he would be the only one to negotiate for the US.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 06-20-2008, 09:02 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 11,108
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TakuanSoho View Post
No it failed because WW refused to compromise and insisted that he would be the only one to negotiate for the US.
>>>That's because the retrogressives wanted to horn in on the negotiating.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 06-20-2008, 09:07 AM
nathanbforrest45's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: mountains of East TN
Posts: 9,239
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George O Well View Post
>>>Things have changed since the 30s. It's called PROGRESS.
But not because of the "progressive" socialist. The only thing that really put an end to eugenics was the Holocaust, which was a natural outcome of eugenics
__________________
Its better to have fussed and crabbed then never to have fussed at all - Lucy
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 06-20-2008, 09:10 AM
nathanbforrest45's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: mountains of East TN
Posts: 9,239
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George O Well View Post
>>>Woody didn't care much for WWI and the League of Nations was a failure. It failed because "retrogressives" made it fail. There are folks out there who believe war is inevitable if the dogma is to be maintained, so we might as well get on with it. Progressives couldn't give a shit less about 'dogma'. Count me in that group.

What history book are you reading that Wilson didn't care much for WW1. He couldn't wait to get us involved in it. There was absolutely no reason the United States should have been involved in that war, none what so ever. To say Wilson didn't care about the war is sheer ignorance.
__________________
Its better to have fussed and crabbed then never to have fussed at all - Lucy
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 06-20-2008, 10:18 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,609
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smartmakesacomeback
A silly generalization...you know better

Yeah, those silly generalizations. You'd think people would know better.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Smartmakesacomeback
If you are not progressive,then you are the opposite,,,"reactionary"
__________________
Ijustshitinmypants

AWE's Masterdebator 2008


http://www.arguewitheveryone.com/war...tml#post579888

The best thing about debating a liberal is watching them spin after you wack 'em!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


» Navigation

Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!


$5 monthly donation:

$10 monthly donation:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Ad Management by RedTyger
Poltical Topsites PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings