Why are liberals so defensive?

T_Ereponemos · #21 (**permalink**) 05-15-2008, 07:17 PM

You can't support the troops, the troops are puppets. What they are commanded to do is not their choice, they obey. Therefore the person in command is the ultimate criminal and he should be punished for all the murders on both sides he has caused.

LCOF · #22 (**permalink**) 05-15-2008, 07:17 PM

Hey toxic, were you thinking of LBJ when you made this ridiculous statement?

"I guess it takes a LIBERAL to know how to fight a war or smartly avoid it and save a $Trillion dollars and thousands of lives."

Let's not forget Wilson in WWI, FDR, and Truman. When it comes to budget wars, and so, so few casualties you libs do it right.

You big DOPE.

toxic · #23 (**permalink**) 05-15-2008, 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by T_Ereponemos

YouTube - Senate Armed Services Sept 23, 2002

Ah yes, the Demise of reason backed by a thousands of primitive roars, why aren't the Iraq War supporters tried for all of the US soldiers cold blooded murders?

Senator Jeff Sessions (Alabama) is the wierdest chickshit geek on the planet. Can you imagine how that little whining bastard would be crying if he ever went to combat.

Look at his bio: When he was 18 in 1964, instead of joining the Army and going to Vietnam, HE BECAME AN EAGLE SCOUT. What a fking woman. Not even a woman, a little girl. :rofl

Biography of U.S. Senator Jeff Sessions, Republican - ALABAMA

toxic · #24 (**permalink**) 05-15-2008, 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LCOF

Hey toxic, were you thinking of LBJ when you made this ridiculous statement?

"I guess it takes a LIBERAL to know how to fight a war or smartly avoid it and save a $Trillion dollars and thousands of lives."

Let's not forget Wilson in WWI, FDR, and Truman. When it comes to budget wars, and so, so few casualties you libs do it right.

You big DOPE.

Hey chump. The same people that wanted a war in Vietnam, started the war in Iraq.

In 1964, they were called illiterate Democrats in the Solid South and Apalachia. Today the exact same pussys are called Neo-con Jesus Freak Evangelical Republicans.

They were butt stupid then and are butt stupid today. They just changed parties along with the KKK.

toxic · #25 (**permalink**) 05-15-2008, 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by T_Ereponemos

You can't support the troops, the troops are puppets. What they are commanded to do is not their choice, they obey. Therefore the person in command is the ultimate criminal and he should be punished for all the murders on both sides he has caused.

I agree.

One of the biggest mistakes in logic, is to go ask 19 year old soldiers their opinion about the war in Iraq, US foreign policy, or anything else.

A 19 year old is still only wide-eyed 19, even if he joined the service and should be more occupied with saving his own ass, than rationalizing what the President is doing.

wow · #26 (**permalink**) 05-15-2008, 08:13 PM

Obama is afraid Bush will convince the Israelis to not give him money.

LCOF · #27 (**permalink**) 05-15-2008, 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by toxic

Hey chump. The same people that wanted a war in Vietnam, started the war in Iraq.

In 1964, they were called illiterate Democrats in the Solid South and Apalachia. Today the exact same pussys are called Neo-con Jesus Freak Evangelical Republicans.

They were butt stupid then and are butt stupid today. They just changed parties along with the KKK.

Libs like Kerry voted for the war, before he voted against as he says, So your point? That is if you have one that has any relative logic.

I'll just forgo asking you to remark on FDR, and Truman. I have a low tolerance for stupid, something that you have a firm grasp on.

Badmutha · #28 (**permalink**) 05-15-2008, 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by webeatu00and04

President Bush while in Israel made a statement that offended a lot of liberals. Bush did not mention any candidate's name or anybody from the democratic party.

Bravo Web...Bravo...only a liberal can give running shoes to a story with no legs.

Quote:

He simply said that there are those that think that you can talk to terrorists.

Which would be almost every democrat---the amazing part...why do liberals get so offended when their own hug-it-out foreign policy is exposed for the lunacy and waste of time that it is.

Quote:

Immediately all of the libs were calling for his head. Why you ask, because he was stating the truth. Libs don't want to be called on what they have said or on their beliefs. These accusations are not false and this is why they immediately got defensive. Anybody that has ever heard far left democrats like Obama know that they are willing to talk to countries that finance terrorism such as Iran, Syria, Cuba, N. Korea, Venezuela, etc. This is not made up, it is what libs believe in. The libs way of thinking is that we can negotiate with irrational fascists dictators. They believe that war is never an option and that they are smart enough to convince terrorists to change their ways. They believe that the U.S. and Bush are the real terrorists for trying to promote peace in the world. They believe we are evil, while countries and leaders of the countries mentioned before are simply misunderstood and we need to find out why they are so angry at us. For all you libs just like Jack Nicholson said "You can't handle the truth".

Truth is the democrats kryptonite---nice post

Quote:

Originally Posted by webeatu00and04

Remember when Chamberlain went to Hitler to talk to him to sign a treaty that stated he would not invade England. Hitler signed it and wiped his ass with it. Just like all of these countries that the libs want to talk and have tea with. They will wipe their asses with our peaceful words and create later on a more catastrophic terrorist environment that will put us in more danger. Remember, Bush has kept us safe here at home because of his fight on terrorism.

Web..your on fire...

Libs just don't understand--people that strap bombs to women and children are going to end ANY and EVERY negotiation with a "and go fuck yourself".

How can their be diplomacy with countries that want nothing less than the complete destruction of western society....

Quote:

Originally Posted by LCOF

Libs as you recall, like to refer to the "Bush Doctrine", as Cowboy diplomacy. They explain we are in Iraq, because Bush wouldn't negotiate, instead went half cocked and we are in war.

Lets review the Iraq diplomacy

UN: Sadam, the world demands you show your country has no WMDs and represents no threat--let the inspectors in

Sadam: Go fuck yourself

Lets review the Iranian diplomacy

UN: You must cease your enrichment of plutonium and nuclear weapons program

Amainitforthejihad: Go fuck yourself

Quote:

Originally Posted by toxic

Both of you have a fantasy concept of war and how it ends. Point out a war that didn't end in negotiation. You morons have no concept of what happens between newspaper printings.

I have one for you...tell me a war that was at all influenced or ended by "negotations" before the outcome had already been decided.

Quote:

This doesn't really suprise me. You don't understand planning, you don't understand war, you don't understand negotiation, ... you are brainless morons, who couldn't negotiate a used car deal.

Every time YOU have tried to negotiate, you get fucked in the ass. Me on ther other hand, get everything I want every time. I have negotiated deals for Fortune 100 companies, internally, with other large US companies, with the US government and with the largest corporations in the world.

The stench of self proclaimed elitism...do the companies behead their competition??.....do your Fortune 100 companies demand the complete destruction of your country.........I wonder how the Toxic Negotiator would work that one out.

Quote:

I guess it takes a LIBERAL to know how to fight a war or smartly avoid it and save a $Trillion dollars and thousands of lives.

Except of course for the MANY liberals that Voted FOR THE WAR!.....

Quote:

If you want to understand how the Iraq War could have been successfully, see General Clark's presentation to the House/Senate Foreign Relations Committee on about Oct 2002.

Why stop shiting on your country there...why not come out and tell us all how badly we are losing Afghanastan as well.....we have been there longer than Iraq...shouldnt you be calling for retreat there as well??

How do liberals fight a war....Retreat!

smart makes a comeback · #29 (**permalink**) 05-15-2008, 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by webeatu00and04

President Bush while in Israel made a statement that offended a lot of liberals. Bush did not mention any candidate's name or anybody from the democratic party. He simply said that there are those that think that you can talk to terrorists. Immediately all of the libs were calling for his head. Why you ask, because he was stating the truth. Libs don't want to be called on what they have said or on their beliefs. These accusations are not false and this is why they immediately got defensive. Anybody that has ever heard far left democrats like Obama know that they are willing to talk to countries that finance terrorism such as Iran, Syria, Cuba, N. Korea, Venezuela, etc. This is not made up, it is what libs believe in. The libs way of thinking is that we can negotiate with irrational fascists dictators. They believe that war is never an option and that they are smart enough to convince terrorists to change their ways. They believe that the U.S. and Bush are the real terrorists for trying to promote peace in the world. They believe we are evil, while countries and leaders of the countries mentioned before are simply misunderstood and we need to find out why they are so angry at us. For all you libs just like Jack Nicholson said "You can't handle the truth".

Why are right wingers so steeped in porojection ?

Did Pol Pot sent you Right wing kooks a THANK YOU card for your support ?

US supports Pol Pot

How about Jonas Savimbi

White House Statement on the President's Meeting With Jonas Savimbi of Angola

How about Jose Napolian Duarte ?

El Salvador death squads

How about Al Queada ?

Reagan set roots for al-Qaeda: World: News: News24

Adolfo Calero ?

Photo Search - Ronald Reagan - Jamd

How about Agusto Pinochet ?

The Crimes of Augusto Pinochet

Ummm...your straw man is blowing away in the wind idiot...LOL

Now dont you feel stupid ?

Quote:

Badmutha

GoArmy.com

Enlist yet...Pussy ?

How come boycunt ?

webeatu00and04 · #30 (**permalink**) 05-15-2008, 10:05 PM

This is for dumbass toxic: I have not read the bullshit written in the communist manifesto. You on the other hand, probably have and you probably believe all of the bullshit that Karl Marx wrote. This is why you are a liberal and this is why you have no brains. If you believe that all people should be in the same economic situation with no free market and the state running everything, than you are a stupid foool. Idiot, communism has never work because it has nothing to offer exept an utopian mirage. It will never be possible because everybody has different drives and goals in life. If you cannot understand that, i could see why you are a liberal. You pansy, while you are here enjoying freedom and all of the fruits of a capitalist society there are others that are suffering because of your stupid idealistic dreams under communism. You are probably rebelling you ass wipe. I on the other hand had to escape a communist country so I can enjoy freedom. Families and friends of mine have been tortured and jailed just because they voice their opinion. You are very lucky to be in a country where you can cry and moan like a little bitch on how bad the U.S. is while there are people all over the world suffering under communist totalitarian regimes and don't enjoy the basic freedoms that you do.