Thread: Question for Kookie

How about anyone on the left answering this one?

Anyone?

Originally Posted by Dom1

Here is an easy question Kookie, and even you should be able to answer.

Do you think a President who condoned torture should (or should have been if in the past) be removed from office?

Yes ALL Presidents should be charged...........Well except Roosevelt, Truman, Kennedy, Johnson, and Clinton.

I guess Kookie is staying away from this one, huh?

The reason why is because earlier (two seperate threads) she was confronted with Clinton and his condoning torture and she ran away both times. She is all talk.

Originally Posted by Dom1

Here is an easy question Kookie, and even you should be able to answer.

Do you think a President who condoned torture should (or should have been if in the past) be removed from office?

Hi Dom,

I'll try to answer your question.....it depends (how's that for a fuzzy liberal answer ). But, seriously, I know where you are going with this....Clinton and his acts of rendition. But, it does depend....not all acts are the same. What laws were violated (US laws and UN/international treaties signed and approved by the US) and what were the mitigating circumstances? For example, say we had custody of some dude that blew up a bomb killing many Saudis in down town Riyadh....and the Saudis wanted him. What do you do? It makes sense that the Saudis may eventually capture people we want. Do we scratch their back???

Originally Posted by Dom1

Here is an easy question Kookie, and even you should be able to answer.

Do you think a President who condoned torture should (or should have been if in the past) be removed from office?

For me the answer is simple. Yes.

Torture is inherently evil, and those who use it/condone it are evil....

Isn't torturous/murderous behavior what we condemn terrorists for?
Be pretty fucking hypocritical to condemn them for what we are also doing don't you think?

I think impeachment for lying, too....Bush lied when he said he wasn't torturing...then it turns out he is torturing..then the tapes are destroyed...smells like Nixon and it's a lie Clinton.

Originally Posted by Cookie Parker

I think impeachment for lying, too....Bush lied when he said he wasn't torturing...then it turns out he is torturing..then the tapes are destroyed...smells like Nixon and it's a lie Clinton.

So then you agree Clinton should have been removed from office, right?

Originally Posted by Dom1

So then you agree Clinton should have been removed from office, right?

Hot Air » Blog Archive » Audio: Clinton endorses “torture” in special cases; Update: World opinion opposes “torture”

Based on BS like this? NAh....Bush is the one endorsing it and calling for it and used $5,000 bounties to get his jollies from the experience....he's the CinC...Clinton is running for office and has opinions....but the ACT of torture is under Bush...he does it and condones it and lies to the American people and Congress about it...just like you are here....you fucking fascist NEw World Order fucking waste...