Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > General Political Debate Forums > General Political Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2007, 08:37 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 15,792
Default Question for Kookie

Here is an easy question Kookie, and even you should be able to answer.

Do you think a President who condoned torture should (or should have been if in the past) be removed from office?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2007, 09:04 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 15,792
Default

How about anyone on the left answering this one?

Anyone?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2007, 09:37 AM
Still Dizzy's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 11,391
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom1 View Post
Here is an easy question Kookie, and even you should be able to answer.

Do you think a President who condoned torture should (or should have been if in the past) be removed from office?


Yes ALL Presidents should be charged...........Well except Roosevelt, Truman, Kennedy, Johnson, and Clinton.
__________________
" A fear of weapons is a sign of retarted sexual, and emotional maturity."- Sigmund Freud "General Introduction To Psychoanalysis"
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2007, 10:05 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 15,792
Default

I guess Kookie is staying away from this one, huh?

The reason why is because earlier (two seperate threads) she was confronted with Clinton and his condoning torture and she ran away both times. She is all talk.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2007, 10:17 AM
StormanNorman's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,118
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom1 View Post
Here is an easy question Kookie, and even you should be able to answer.

Do you think a President who condoned torture should (or should have been if in the past) be removed from office?
Hi Dom,

I'll try to answer your question.....it depends (how's that for a fuzzy liberal answer ). But, seriously, I know where you are going with this....Clinton and his acts of rendition. But, it does depend....not all acts are the same. What laws were violated (US laws and UN/international treaties signed and approved by the US) and what were the mitigating circumstances? For example, say we had custody of some dude that blew up a bomb killing many Saudis in down town Riyadh....and the Saudis wanted him. What do you do? It makes sense that the Saudis may eventually capture people we want. Do we scratch their back???
__________________
The Lone Ranger of the AWE liberal elitists.....who was that masked man???
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


And now, I'm the Elitist of liberal Elitists...
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2007, 10:36 AM
Heckler's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 3,961
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom1 View Post
Here is an easy question Kookie, and even you should be able to answer.

Do you think a President who condoned torture should (or should have been if in the past) be removed from office?

For me the answer is simple. Yes.

Torture is inherently evil, and those who use it/condone it are evil....

Isn't torturous/murderous behavior what we condemn terrorists for?
Be pretty fucking hypocritical to condemn them for what we are also doing don't you think?
__________________
"If you're going to tell people the truth, be funny or they'll kill you." -- Billy Wilder

"Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied." -- Otto Von Bismark
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2007, 10:40 AM
Cookie Parker's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,511
Default

I think impeachment for lying, too....Bush lied when he said he wasn't torturing...then it turns out he is torturing..then the tapes are destroyed...smells like Nixon and it's a lie Clinton.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



When you want to know the truth, search all articles available on your topic. The truth lies somewhere between it all.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2007, 10:50 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 15,792
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cookie Parker View Post
I think impeachment for lying, too....Bush lied when he said he wasn't torturing...then it turns out he is torturing..then the tapes are destroyed...smells like Nixon and it's a lie Clinton.
So then you agree Clinton should have been removed from office, right?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2007, 10:55 AM
Cookie Parker's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,511
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom1 View Post
So then you agree Clinton should have been removed from office, right?
Hot Air » Blog Archive » Audio: Clinton endorses “torture” in special cases; Update: World opinion opposes “torture”

Based on BS like this? NAh....Bush is the one endorsing it and calling for it and used $5,000 bounties to get his jollies from the experience....he's the CinC...Clinton is running for office and has opinions....but the ACT of torture is under Bush...he does it and condones it and lies to the American people and Congress about it...just like you are here....you fucking fascist NEw World Order fucking waste...
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



When you want to know the truth, search all articles available on your topic. The truth lies somewhere between it all.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2007, 11:01 AM
FedUpAmerican's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,912
Blog Entries: 21
Send a message via Yahoo to FedUpAmerican
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom1 View Post
So then you agree Clinton should have been removed from office, right?
You fucktards are so obsessed with Clinton. But it doesn't change ANYTHING about bushit.

dumdum, TRYING to lead someone to make a point is NOT one of your strong points. You're nowhere near smart enough.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

When you STUPID republicunts try to hurl that label at my feet, 'Liberal,' as if it were something to be ashamed of, something dirty, something to run away from, it won't work because I will pick up that label and I will wear it as a badge of honor.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


» Navigation

Social Groups

Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!


$5 monthly donation:

$10 monthly donation:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0