Crowley is a faggot pedophile protector and Bubba is his ultimate fantasy.

Oh really? There is a difference? Not according to your own gay publishers!

Gays are not a race. Gays are people who engage in negative behavior....just as violence is a negative behavior. You have no group identity along racial lines.....you only have deviance and pedophilia that you fags share in common.

I think that your altering someone elses writings shows who and what you are! Are you that moronic and that stupid that you think your forging something and putting it forward as someone else's writings is a decent and honest act? Hell no, it is the sign of someone dishonest, unethical, sneaky, low, disgusting, and I am certain that everyone in society would believe that your actions were wrong. As you have just claimed responsiblity for it and tried to make it sound like the right thing to do, then you have clearly shot yourself in the foot on establishing any credibility with anyone else in here. Any credibility that you might have had vanished when you did that to the man. In other words, you are a liar and you admit it and you take pride in it.

It is no secret that you are one of the ass pirates in here. Now, you are not only an ass pirate, you are a confirmed dishonest one at that. I think all of it add up to SCUMBAG, and you earned it.

OngMongPukin.

Take the Seconal!

That's fine. You're entitled to your opinion, I respect that.
I purposefully & transparently did that to give an exclamation to the kind of dishonest & distorting propaganda Razzputin has put out from the beginning. There are only 3 others I have blatantly distorted, as they do the same to mine, constantly.

Now to be fair Razzputin has not done that but what he has done is the equivalent.

He is so one dimensionally acidic towards more than half the country, he never opens enough for any conversation, just his one obsession that it becomes a slow seeping poison.

I liked your post. It had passion & came across with some depth. The last part was par for the course around here, your gay, that I just disregarded.

I cannot say that you were wrong in your assessment of what I did. By altering Razzputin's post when he hasn't done it to me, I have just added to the cycle. The description you gave is exactly how I've felt about those that have broken my barrier.

Since I've done the same thing as those I loath, then I am acting just like them.

Ironically if because of doing this I am by your & Razzputins definition, gay, then by that estimation so are the ones that have done it to me eh?

Like Luminox PM & Lasher.
What I find interesting is that based on the last descriptor of being gay, you've shown that all of you share pretty much the same loathing issues, the same poison.

__________________
The crows seemed to be calling his name, thought Caw.
- Jack Handy

Hey asshole....there is no valid excuse for what you do. You sit here and you admit to altering the writings of others.

As much as I dont agree with a bunch of trashy fags, I dont alter their writings.

Mong is right. What you have done.....and what you just did again in this latest post.....is to destroy your own credibility.

Some people have said of the faggot camp that they have never met a smart person among those who shove things up their ass. In your particular case, that saying definitely has merit.

Your credibility is GONE. You destroyed it on your own.

If you cant compose a simple retort on your own and stand behind it for the sake of arguement and debate, then perhaps this kitchen is a little to hot for you, and you probably need to get out of it.

No one is required to accept anything....not a fag...not a thief....not an ass-whuppin....not counterfeit money....not filth....not anything.

If you dont agree with someone, then just say you dont agree. Are you nuts? I think you must be nuts. What disturbs me is how you so easily commit the act. And then you attempted to justify it to yourself, and how you then try to bend and twist it to justify it to others. I think that pedophiles behave like that when they are caught attacking a child. It is this behavior pattern, this "justiying" of the bad acts, that is the absolute trademark of the queers. It is undoubtedly that which makes you all dangerour to the kiddies and to society in general. It is the mark of the criminal mindset coupled with your sexual confusion that makes you create victims out of others. This is why the queer will never be trusted in full by society. You bastards have too many "problems" that pose a risk to other people.

What makes you think that you queers are "half the country?" Isnt that just a bit arrogant of you to make such an assertion? Again you go from attempting to justify a very bad act, right over to deception by trying to paint yourself into a majority by labeling yourself a queer that makes up half the country.

Through acts like yours, I am beginning to understand more and more why queers are dangerous.

You dont even know Razz, and you accuse him of hating "half the country." He doesnt even hate queers. He doesnt hate anyone. He is just outraged that 1 to 3 percent of the "population" would organize to attack society in a political movement that is most clearly based on deviants. The American constitution which you queers claim gives you the right to attack the public school system and force the queer bullshit on others who reject it, is the same constitution that gives people like Razz the right to speak out against the queer movements.

Mr. Dude, or Miss Dude, or Hermophrodite, or whatever or whoever you are, I encourage you to take a look at yourself. Take a look at what you have done, and at what you always do, and attempt to apply truth and honesty to it. I am thinking that in many cases, you are going to find that what you do and what you have done will tend to drift away from that which is honest. When you find that to be true, then you have taken the first step in identifying the fact that you have some issues. These issues dont have to mean that you are lost and gone forever from the human species. But they do mean that you are creating victims. Is that what you truly want to do? Because if it is, you have even bigger issues than dishonesty.

I say to you with all sincerity: WORK ON YOURSELF! You had the ability to humiliate yourself a little bit in explaining yourself. That has to mean that somewhere inside of you there is the basis for a good human being to emerge, and perhaps that should be said "to emerge once again." You got lost somewhere along your journey through life. Find yourself again, and make an effort to restore your honor and dignity by taking a look at your lifestyle and your actions. That which is reprehensible does not have to be that which is usual.

fr sotmfs:

>...Razz,I am an intelligent human.I know the difference between a pedophile and a homosexual...<

Most intelligent people DO know the difference between a molester and a GLBT.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, we been hearing that shit since a peanut farmer was president.

READ, ASSHOLE, READ; Your own perverted fag leaders disagree with you!

SLAMMER:
This is another commentary - cut-n-paste, and you faggots can figure out where it came from. The names in this article have not been changed, and you faggots can research on your own, all that you like. That way you faggots might learn more about your organized crimes against the American people. Anyone that trusts a faggot with a child needs their fukn head examined.

(Commenting on) The Journal of Homosexuality and Pedophilia

The Journal of Homosexuality is viewed as the premier "mainstream" English-language publication of the gay movement. One prominent editor is John DeCecco, a psychologist at San Francisco State University who also serves on the editorial board of the Dutch pedophile journal Paidika. It is therefore not surprising to see pedophilia promoted on its pages.

In 1990 the Journal of Homosexuality published a series of essays on pedophilia that were eventually published as Male Inter-Generational Intimacy: Historical, Socio-Psychological, and Legal Perspectives, edited by pedophile Edward Brongersma. None of the essays offered any substantive criticism of pedophilia: most blatantly promoted man-boy love as the natural right of homosexuals.

In 1999 Helmut Graupner, wrote an article on pedophilia in the Journal of Homosexuality, in which he claims: "Man/boy and woman/girl relations without doubt are same-sex relations and they do constitute an aspect of gay and lesbian life." Graupner argues that, as such, consensual sexual relations between adult homosexuals and youths as young as fourteen qualifies as a "gay rights issue."[

The fascination with pedophilia continues to be a cause of concern even within the gay community. Lesbian columnist Paula Martinac, writing in the homosexual newspaper Washington Blade, states:

Some gay men still maintain that an adult who has same-sex relations with someone under the legal age of consent is on some level doing the kid a favor by helping to bring him or her 'out.' It's not pedophilia, this thinking goes--pedophilia refers only to little kids. Instead, adult-youth sex is viewed as an important aspect of gay culture, with a history dating back to 'Greek love' of ancient times. This romanticized version of adult-youth sexual relations has been a staple of gay literature and has made appearances, too, in gay-themed films.

Martinac adds that "When some gay men venerate adult-youth sex as affirming while simultaneously declaring 'We're not pedophiles,' they send an inconsistent message to society. . . . The lesbian and gay community will never be successful in fighting the pedophile stereotype until we all stop condoning sex with young people."