You need to make up your fucking mind. In one thread you say its a state issue, but here you argue its a federal issue. As with every issue you address you are all over the fucking map. Lost without a compass.

California has joined Mass. in allowing same sex marriages. Get used to it.

__________________
If you want change stop electing "liberal: democrats and "radical" Republicans. Find and support true Conservatives; those who believe in fiscal responsibilities, individual accountability, and a smaller government, with less control of your daily life.

That would be only fair.

__________________
"I consider Homo anal sex to be a religion." - Wow, AWE poster.

No, they have recognized that it is unconstitutional to deprive a group of law-abiding, tax-paying citizens their equal rights as did Prop 22. They did their job...reviewed a bad law...and threw it out. They did NOT make a law, they threw a bad law out.

It's called Judicial Review.

__________________
"I consider Homo anal sex to be a religion." - Wow, AWE poster.

As do straight couples.
As do straight couples.

You mean like already happens for straight couples? With gays helping foot the bill for something they have no access to?

Show us the law where it is manditory for married couples to reproduce. Show us the law where it is manditory for those reproducing to be married.

Hint: Those laws do not exist. Therefore your argument is nothing.

The biggest falsity of all. Marriage can be religious and it can be legal...it can be both. It does not have to be religious to be legal and it does not have to be legal to be religious.

And...many religions already perform gay marriages.

Your argument has more holes in it than lacey swiss cheese.

__________________
"I consider Homo anal sex to be a religion." - Wow, AWE poster.

I understand that I live in a Republic that uses Democracy to elect it's officials, pass bills into laws etc...... but you are dodging the point here.
The people of CA. "VOTED" to ban Gay marriage.

__________________
Drill offshore now

Filing Federal income and inheritance tax. They are prohibited from using the joint filing, which eliminates in the case of a partner who is truely dependent, say a blind partner with lots of medical bills and no income, being counted toward the deductions for the one with assets and income.

And if one spouse in a gay marriage dies, the spouse is not allowed to inherit tax deferred as a is true for mixed marriages. The Federal government would not recoginize the community property of California as community property, so if a couple split and the property was divided according to California law, the Federal government would rule that the effective transfer would be a gift, and subject to tax. Alimony would be consider a gift which would not only be subject to income tax but also subject to gift tax.

But Christianity supports gay marriage: Gene Robinson is an ordained bishop or something for the US version of the Church of England which is the English version of THE Christian Church.

So, gay marriage isn't an attack on Christianity, but an attack on radical Islam. So, if you are against gay marriage, that puts you with Osama bin Laden and Addredejnigadhamididge.

;-)

If the majority of voters voted to take away your citizenship and sell as a slave in Saudi Arabia, you consider that the valid will of the people?

bodecea,

Why do you think single taxpayer's pay higher taxes than married filing jointly?
Answer: Lower taxes are used to encourage reproduction and this applies to all benefits of being married. Once again, REPRODUCTION.
I could go further and say Homo marriage should open the door to lower taxes for single taxpayers or higher taxes for married couples, either way, we need equality for single taxpayers.

The contract of marriage is to provide stability for reproduction and a divorce settlement is similar. There would be no Homos if not for reproduction.

With the origin of marriage being religious and the Govt recognizes this religious ceremony in the form of Social Security spousal benefits, this goes against the Homo's claim of the first amendment establishes the separation of church and state.

The bottom line: The people of CA. VOTED to ban Gay marriage.

__________________
Drill offshore now

They voted to ban illegal immigration also. Look were that went, and it wasn't even done by a group of judges.


Sorry, Mulp, you are confussing federal with state. The federal govt. could rule almost anything, but they haven't yet. In fact, I'll bet you couldn't get 4 out of 10 federal tax auditors to rule the same way on any given case. How is Mass. handling it?

But you still have not listed one thing passed by Bush, or his administration, that prohibits them from sharing in community property.

__________________
If you want change stop electing "liberal: democrats and "radical" Republicans. Find and support true Conservatives; those who believe in fiscal responsibilities, individual accountability, and a smaller government, with less control of your daily life.