What is wrong with it?

Gropiemon · #21 (**permalink**) 05-08-2008, 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gummer

You are a real Forrest Gump aren't you?

That's not such a bad thing. Forrest got MAD pussy, met like 20 presidents, got lots of exercise and was able to carry a retarded black man 200 yards. I take your insult and say thank you sir. Would you like some chocolate? How bout a kiss? I bet you taste like cig-rettes...

wolf_22 · #22 (**permalink**) 05-08-2008, 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gummer

I'm glad you asked..... let's see.....hmmmmm ....... if you spend your life cornholing or bumping clits with your "significant other" what will your next generation look like? ..... ooops .....there won't be a next generation ...... oh well ....seems like nature didn't want them to reproduce anyway....

1- reproduction isn't a need for everyone (but its not a heterosexual, homosexual, female, or males desire when it is. its a human desire)

2-we have over popuation

3-we have technology so infertile couples and gay people can have kids (and surrogatcy has been around since biblical times)

4-gays are great for all them kids in foster care (as are infertile couples)

Gummer · #23 (**permalink**) 05-08-2008, 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wolf_22

1- reproduction isn't a need for everyone (but its not a heterosexual, homosexual, female, or males desire when it is. its a human desire)

2-we have over popuation

3-we have technology so infertile couples and gay people can have kids (and surrogatcy has been around since biblical times)

4-gays are great for all them kids in foster care (as are infertile couples)

I can agree with your #2.... and I thank you and your kind for your contribution/solution to that problem.

wolf_22 · #24 (**permalink**) 05-08-2008, 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gummer

I can agree with your #2.... and I thank you and your kind for your contribution/solution to that problem.

I plan on having about 8 kids. so I don't think I will adding a solution to that problem. perhaps if I adopt a few of those kids, but I'm not sure if I want to do that or not.

Loa · #25 (**permalink**) 05-09-2008, 01:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wolf_22

3-we have technology so infertile couples and gay people can have kids (and surrogatcy has been around since biblical times)

4-gays are great for all them kids in foster care (as are infertile couples)

True, I should've thought of that earlier. These days, not being able to reproduce via intercourse is merely a minor obstacle if you want to have your own children. Also, someone needs to adopt all those kids we end up with due to pro-lifers.

So, "not able to reproduce" is a moot argument.

Loa · #26 (**permalink**) 05-09-2008, 01:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gummer

.....and don't try to tell us it is other than a perversion of the natural sequence of a species.

Then for f's sake, stop yelling in our ears that it is!

Not saying you did now, but bigots have a nasty tendency of doing just that.

Razzputin · #27 (**permalink**) 05-09-2008, 08:23 AM

Originally Posted by Gummer
I'm glad you asked..... let's see.....hmmmmm ....... if you spend your life cornholing or bumping clits with your "significant other" what will your next generation look like? ..... ooops .....there won't be a next generation ...... oh well ....seems like nature didn't want them to reproduce anyway....

This is exactly the truth.

Razzputin · #28 (**permalink**) 05-09-2008, 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loa

Then for f's sake, stop yelling in our ears that it is!

Not saying you did now, but bigots have a nasty tendency of doing just that.

Are you prejudice against bigots? Does not the same constitution that gives you the right run around acting like a faggot give another the right to run around and denounce you for acting like a faggot in front of children?

The constitution was not printed on pink paper you know. Neither was the bill of rights.